Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17782

Received: 06/04/2010

Respondent: Mr Andrew Allen

Representation Summary:

This section is factually incorrect and misleading.

Full text:

This section is factually incorrect and misleading as follows:
"From this, the Core Strategy Submission document has emerged, which has taken account of all previous stages and comments received."
The Core Strategy Submission document was opened for public consultation, and many representations have been received. The next step in actioning these representations is as per the public enquiry starting May this year in which the Planning inspector will hear the representations. Surely until these representations have been heard neither the core strategy, or this DPD documentation should be considered finalised.
Also this section goes onto state "Specific locations for the development will be discussed in this document and states how this will be delivered." This document includes questions to prompt public feedback by asking questions such as those in the "Other Issues and Next Steps" section. If this document, and the core stratgy document is final, then why waste the publics time seeking feedback! The party's not over until the fat lady sings! Or is it. Please clarify.