Object
Core Strategy Submission Document
Representation ID: 16216
Received: 02/11/2009
Respondent: Countryside Properties (Southern) Ltd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
we would argue that further longer term growth should be planned for in Rayleigh, particularly at the most sustainable location for Rayleigh, land north of London Road, on top of the earlier allocations.
Unsound (ii) not effective (not deliverable/not flexible)
It is noted that there are no numbers allocated for Rayleigh post 2021. Bearing in mind;
(i) The sustainability and accessibility credentials for Rayleigh as opposed to other settlements within the district
(ii) Our views that identified brownfiield sites may not be able to be delivered
(iii) The constraints associated with those sites identified in Policy H3
(iv) That we consider that North of London Road, Rayleigh, can take more than the identified number of units
we would argue that further longer term growth should be planned for in Rayleigh, particularly at the most sustainable location for Rayleigh, land north of London Road, on top of the earlier allocations.