Object

Core Strategy Submission Document

Representation ID: 16216

Received: 02/11/2009

Respondent: Countryside Properties (Southern) Ltd

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

we would argue that further longer term growth should be planned for in Rayleigh, particularly at the most sustainable location for Rayleigh, land north of London Road, on top of the earlier allocations.

Full text:

Unsound (ii) not effective (not deliverable/not flexible)

It is noted that there are no numbers allocated for Rayleigh post 2021. Bearing in mind;

(i) The sustainability and accessibility credentials for Rayleigh as opposed to other settlements within the district
(ii) Our views that identified brownfiield sites may not be able to be delivered
(iii) The constraints associated with those sites identified in Policy H3
(iv) That we consider that North of London Road, Rayleigh, can take more than the identified number of units

we would argue that further longer term growth should be planned for in Rayleigh, particularly at the most sustainable location for Rayleigh, land north of London Road, on top of the earlier allocations.