Comment

London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options

Representation ID: 14216

Received: 17/12/2008

Respondent: Mr J Bramble

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 1.1
'The JAAP will...safeguard areas and places sensitive to change.'
Fine words....but empty words completely lacking credibility in the light of the preferred option (issue 1) to extend the runway the effect of which would be to destroy the quality of life for all those residents living close to or under the flight path.

Full text:

I write with the reference to your letter dated 3rd November 2008 which enclosed a questionnaire relating to the above exercise. I have to say I was a little surprised to receive your letter in as much as I reside within the Borough of Southend and normally look to Southend Council to consult me on any planning applications likely to effect me.
I can only think that your letter to me may have been the result of the correspondence I have had over the years with your good selves, amongst others, on the proposals of the expansion of Southend Airport. Living as we do on the flight path to and from the airport this remains a vital issue for us and our future quality of life; and we feel strongly that it is only right and proper that we (and residents in a similar position to us) are directly invited to have our say on whatever conclusions the working party reach as the result of there consideration of the consultation exercise on the Joint Area Action Plan. We felt very aggrieved that we were not directly included in this exercise having only become aware through a relatively small item in the Southend Standard. I wrote to the leader of Southend Council as the result of this and was assured by him that opportunity would be given to all interested parties of all contribute.
We are particularly in a difficult position relating to the airport issue inasmuch as we reside in the area under the jurisdiction of Southend Council but, of course, the airport and issue relating to it fall in the responsibility of Rochford District Council. I would therefore welcome your assurance that we will be invited to contribute before proposals are set in stone and your advice as to when such an invitation is likely to be sent out and from which council.