Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Search representations
Results for Inner London Group search
New searchObject
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option E19
Representation ID: 19969
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Inner London Group
Agent: Christopher Wickham Associates
Employment use in this location could be detrimental to the setting and amenity of the proposed residential development at the adjacent Star Lane former brickworks site.
Employment use in this location could be detrimental to the setting and amenity of the proposed residential development at the adjacent Star Lane former brickworks site.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option E20
Representation ID: 19972
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Inner London Group
Agent: Christopher Wickham Associates
Employment use in this location could be detrimental to the setting and amenity of the proposed residential development at the adjacent Star Lane former brickworks site.
Employment use in this location could be detrimental to the setting and amenity of the proposed residential development at the adjacent Star Lane former brickworks site.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option E22
Representation ID: 19973
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Inner London Group
Agent: Christopher Wickham Associates
Employment use in this location could be detrimental to the setting and amenity of the proposed residential development at the adjacent Star Lane former brickworks site.
Employment use in this location could be detrimental to the setting and amenity of the proposed residential development at the adjacent Star Lane former brickworks site.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Do you agree that the areas shown in Figure 4.3 and listed in Table 4.1 should be allocated as Local Wildlife Sites?
Representation ID: 19976
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Inner London Group
Agent: Christopher Wickham Associates
In relation to R28 (River Roach at Rochford), it is considered that the ecological value of the grassland part of the designation (on the north side of the river) is questionable.
In relation to R28 (River Roach at Rochford), it is considered that the ecological value of the grassland part of the designation (on the north side of the river) is questionable.
