Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Search representations

Results for Chelmsford Diocese Board of Finance search

New search New search

Support

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Option SC2

Representation ID: 22707

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Chelmsford Diocese Board of Finance

Agent: Strutt & Parker

Representation Summary:

It is considered that SC2 is the most appropriate option to provide the development outlined in the Core Strategy Submission Document.

The Site Assessment undertaken as part of the Rochford Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (Site 193) considers that the site has the capacity to provide a sufficient quantum of homes that would result in the community benefits as set out in the Core Strategy.

Full text:

It is considered that SC2 is the most appropriate option to provide the development outlined in the Core Strategy Submission Document.

This report has considered conformity with the Core Strategy's strategic policies, the ability of the site option to meet the criteria listed under paragraph 4.19 of the Core Strategy and the performance of the options under the criterion of the site assessments (Achievability, Viability, Suitability, Deliverability, and having capacity to deliver the required infrastructure.

The Site Assessment undertaken as part of the Rochford Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (Site 193) considers that the site has the capacity to provide a sufficient quantum of homes that would result in the community benefits as set out in the Core Strategy.

After this assessment, option SC2 is supported as the best option to provide a housing allocation as an extension to the south west of Canewdon. To a lesser extent, options SC3 and SC4 are supported. However, these options would not have the benefit of providing such a defined Green Belt boundary at the village limit, nor would they enable an integrated development to be provided along with infrastructure such as play space.

(For further details see supplied report)

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Option SC3

Representation ID: 22708

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Chelmsford Diocese Board of Finance

Agent: Strutt & Parker

Representation Summary:

After this assessment, option SC2 is supported as the best option to provide a housing allocation as an extension to the south west of Canewdon. To a lesser extent, options SC3 and SC4 are supported. However, these options would not have the benefit of providing such a defined Green Belt boundary at the village limit, nor would they enable an integrated development to be provided along with infrastructure such as play space.

Full text:

It is considered that SC2 is the most appropriate option to provide the development outlined in the Core Strategy Submission Document.

This report has considered conformity with the Core Strategy's strategic policies, the ability of the site option to meet the criteria listed under paragraph 4.19 of the Core Strategy and the performance of the options under the criterion of the site assessments (Achievability, Viability, Suitability, Deliverability, and having capacity to deliver the required infrastructure.

The Site Assessment undertaken as part of the Rochford Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (Site 193) considers that the site has the capacity to provide a sufficient quantum of homes that would result in the community benefits as set out in the Core Strategy.

After this assessment, option SC2 is supported as the best option to provide a housing allocation as an extension to the south west of Canewdon. To a lesser extent, options SC3 and SC4 are supported. However, these options would not have the benefit of providing such a defined Green Belt boundary at the village limit, nor would they enable an integrated development to be provided along with infrastructure such as play space.

(For further details see supplied report)

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Option SC4

Representation ID: 22709

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Chelmsford Diocese Board of Finance

Agent: Strutt & Parker

Representation Summary:

After this assessment, option SC2 is supported as the best option to provide a housing allocation as an extension to the south west of Canewdon. To a lesser extent, options SC3 and SC4 are supported. However, these options would not have the benefit of providing such a defined Green Belt boundary at the village limit, nor would they enable an integrated development to be provided along with infrastructure such as play space.

Full text:

It is considered that SC2 is the most appropriate option to provide the development outlined in the Core Strategy Submission Document.

This report has considered conformity with the Core Strategy's strategic policies, the ability of the site option to meet the criteria listed under paragraph 4.19 of the Core Strategy and the performance of the options under the criterion of the site assessments (Achievability, Viability, Suitability, Deliverability, and having capacity to deliver the required infrastructure.

The Site Assessment undertaken as part of the Rochford Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (Site 193) considers that the site has the capacity to provide a sufficient quantum of homes that would result in the community benefits as set out in the Core Strategy.

After this assessment, option SC2 is supported as the best option to provide a housing allocation as an extension to the south west of Canewdon. To a lesser extent, options SC3 and SC4 are supported. However, these options would not have the benefit of providing such a defined Green Belt boundary at the village limit, nor would they enable an integrated development to be provided along with infrastructure such as play space.

(For further details see supplied report)

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.