Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Search representations
Results for Chelmsford Diocese Board of Finance search
New searchSupport
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SC2
Representation ID: 22707
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Chelmsford Diocese Board of Finance
Agent: Strutt & Parker
It is considered that SC2 is the most appropriate option to provide the development outlined in the Core Strategy Submission Document.
The Site Assessment undertaken as part of the Rochford Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (Site 193) considers that the site has the capacity to provide a sufficient quantum of homes that would result in the community benefits as set out in the Core Strategy.
It is considered that SC2 is the most appropriate option to provide the development outlined in the Core Strategy Submission Document.
This report has considered conformity with the Core Strategy's strategic policies, the ability of the site option to meet the criteria listed under paragraph 4.19 of the Core Strategy and the performance of the options under the criterion of the site assessments (Achievability, Viability, Suitability, Deliverability, and having capacity to deliver the required infrastructure.
The Site Assessment undertaken as part of the Rochford Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (Site 193) considers that the site has the capacity to provide a sufficient quantum of homes that would result in the community benefits as set out in the Core Strategy.
After this assessment, option SC2 is supported as the best option to provide a housing allocation as an extension to the south west of Canewdon. To a lesser extent, options SC3 and SC4 are supported. However, these options would not have the benefit of providing such a defined Green Belt boundary at the village limit, nor would they enable an integrated development to be provided along with infrastructure such as play space.
(For further details see supplied report)
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SC3
Representation ID: 22708
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Chelmsford Diocese Board of Finance
Agent: Strutt & Parker
After this assessment, option SC2 is supported as the best option to provide a housing allocation as an extension to the south west of Canewdon. To a lesser extent, options SC3 and SC4 are supported. However, these options would not have the benefit of providing such a defined Green Belt boundary at the village limit, nor would they enable an integrated development to be provided along with infrastructure such as play space.
It is considered that SC2 is the most appropriate option to provide the development outlined in the Core Strategy Submission Document.
This report has considered conformity with the Core Strategy's strategic policies, the ability of the site option to meet the criteria listed under paragraph 4.19 of the Core Strategy and the performance of the options under the criterion of the site assessments (Achievability, Viability, Suitability, Deliverability, and having capacity to deliver the required infrastructure.
The Site Assessment undertaken as part of the Rochford Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (Site 193) considers that the site has the capacity to provide a sufficient quantum of homes that would result in the community benefits as set out in the Core Strategy.
After this assessment, option SC2 is supported as the best option to provide a housing allocation as an extension to the south west of Canewdon. To a lesser extent, options SC3 and SC4 are supported. However, these options would not have the benefit of providing such a defined Green Belt boundary at the village limit, nor would they enable an integrated development to be provided along with infrastructure such as play space.
(For further details see supplied report)
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SC4
Representation ID: 22709
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Chelmsford Diocese Board of Finance
Agent: Strutt & Parker
After this assessment, option SC2 is supported as the best option to provide a housing allocation as an extension to the south west of Canewdon. To a lesser extent, options SC3 and SC4 are supported. However, these options would not have the benefit of providing such a defined Green Belt boundary at the village limit, nor would they enable an integrated development to be provided along with infrastructure such as play space.
It is considered that SC2 is the most appropriate option to provide the development outlined in the Core Strategy Submission Document.
This report has considered conformity with the Core Strategy's strategic policies, the ability of the site option to meet the criteria listed under paragraph 4.19 of the Core Strategy and the performance of the options under the criterion of the site assessments (Achievability, Viability, Suitability, Deliverability, and having capacity to deliver the required infrastructure.
The Site Assessment undertaken as part of the Rochford Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (Site 193) considers that the site has the capacity to provide a sufficient quantum of homes that would result in the community benefits as set out in the Core Strategy.
After this assessment, option SC2 is supported as the best option to provide a housing allocation as an extension to the south west of Canewdon. To a lesser extent, options SC3 and SC4 are supported. However, these options would not have the benefit of providing such a defined Green Belt boundary at the village limit, nor would they enable an integrated development to be provided along with infrastructure such as play space.
(For further details see supplied report)