Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Search representations
Results for Bull Lane Development Group search
New searchObject
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
North of London Road, Rayleigh 550 dwellings
Representation ID: 18042
Received: 14/04/2010
Respondent: Bull Lane Development Group
This area is not the most suitable, with some of the area being Flood Zone 3, a flood risk assessment (FRA)would have to be passed by the environment agency, including a sequential test. As there are other options for housing in areas offered which are not in flood zone 3, then this application should fail, and other areas must be considered for housing which are not in flood Zone 3.
This area is not the most suitable, with some of the area being Flood Zone 3, a flood risk assessment (FRA)would have to be passed by the environment agency, including a sequential test. As there are other options for housing in areas offered which are not in flood zone 3, then this application should fail, and other areas must be considered for housing which are not in flood Zone 3.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option NLR2
Representation ID: 18101
Received: 15/04/2010
Respondent: Bull Lane Development Group
This area is not the most suitable, with some of the area being Flood Zone 3, a flood risk assessment (FRA)would have to be passed by the environment agency, including a sequential test. As there are other options for housing in areas offered which are not in flood zone 3, then this application should fail, and other areas must be considered for housing which are not in flood Zone 3.
All other areas have not been considered which is evident by the lack of completion witihin SHLAA Proforma document.
Plus costs of necessary schools , transport , sustainability is too high.
This area is not the most suitable, with some of the area being Flood Zone 3, a flood risk assessment (FRA)would have to be passed by the environment agency, including a sequential test. As there are other options for housing in areas offered which are not in flood zone 3, then this application should fail, and other areas must be considered for housing which are not in flood Zone 3.
All other areas have not been considered which is evident by the lack of completion witihin SHLAA Proforma document.
Plus costs of necessary schools , transport , sustainability is too high.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option NLR3
Representation ID: 18108
Received: 15/04/2010
Respondent: Bull Lane Development Group
Proposed housing here in Rayleigh -not the best choice , with Flood Zone 3, a flood risk assessment (FRA)would have to be passed by the environment agency, including a sequential test.
Costs of schools , transport , sustainability too high.
As there are options for housing at other sites then this application should fail, and other areas must be considered for housing which are not in flood Zone 3. Sites put foward have not been considered - evident by the lack of completion witihin SHLAA Proforma document.
Proposed housing here in Rayleigh -not the best choice , with Flood Zone 3, a flood risk assessment (FRA)would have to be passed by the environment agency, including a sequential test.
Costs of schools , transport , sustainability too high.
As there are options for housing at other sites then this application should fail, and other areas must be considered for housing which are not in flood Zone 3. Sites put foward have not been considered - evident by the lack of completion witihin SHLAA Proforma document.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option NLR4
Representation ID: 18111
Received: 15/04/2010
Respondent: Bull Lane Development Group
This area is not the most suitable, with some of the area being Flood Zone 3, a flood risk assessment (FRA)would have to be passed by the environment agency, including a sequential test. As there are other options for housing in areas offered which are not in flood zone 3, then this application should fail, and other areas must be considered for housing which are not in flood Zone 3.
All other areas have not been considered which is evident by the lack of completion witihin SHLAA Proforma document.
Plus costs of necessary schools , transport , sustainability is too high.
This area is not the most suitable, with some of the area being Flood Zone 3, a flood risk assessment (FRA)would have to be passed by the environment agency, including a sequential test. As there are other options for housing in areas offered which are not in flood zone 3, then this application should fail, and other areas must be considered for housing which are not in flood Zone 3.
All other areas have not been considered which is evident by the lack of completion witihin SHLAA Proforma document.
Plus costs of necessary schools , transport , sustainability is too high.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option NLR5
Representation ID: 18113
Received: 15/04/2010
Respondent: Bull Lane Development Group
This area is not the most suitable, with some of the area being Flood Zone 3, a flood risk assessment (FRA)would have to be passed by the environment agency, including a sequential test. As there are other options for housing in areas offered which are not in flood zone 3, then this application should fail, and other areas must be considered for housing which are not in flood Zone 3.
All other areas have not been considered which is evident by the lack of completion witihin SHLAA Proforma document.
Plus costs of necessary schools , transport , sustainability is too high.
This area is not the most suitable, with some of the area being Flood Zone 3, a flood risk assessment (FRA)would have to be passed by the environment agency, including a sequential test. As there are other options for housing in areas offered which are not in flood zone 3, then this application should fail, and other areas must be considered for housing which are not in flood Zone 3.
All other areas have not been considered which is evident by the lack of completion witihin SHLAA Proforma document.
Plus costs of necessary schools , transport , sustainability is too high.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
NLR - Should other sites in this location be considered?
Representation ID: 18127
Received: 15/04/2010
Respondent: Bull Lane Development Group
NLR 1-5 I cannot understand why building in flood zone 3 ihas been put forward, with regard to safe access and ingress, sequential test, transport, schools, and sustainability. What is very conscerning is, WHY ARE THESE SITES BEING CONSIDERED??.
When I trace the Site information Proforma information on other good sites they have not all been completed, therefore it is an unfair playing field. WHY IS THIS??
Here we have too many houses , additional traffic in one area,
NLR 1-5 I cannot understand why building in flood zone 3 ihas been put forward, with regard to safe access and ingress, sequential test, transport, schools, and sustainability. What is very conscerning is, WHY ARE THESE SITES BEING CONSIDERED??.
When I trace the Site information Proforma information on other good sites they have not all been completed, therefore it is an unfair playing field. WHY IS THIS??
Here we have too many houses , additional traffic in one area,
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option NLR1
Representation ID: 18138
Received: 15/04/2010
Respondent: Bull Lane Development Group
NLR1 should not be considered as part of the area is in Flood Zone 3, a flood risk assessment (FRA)would have to be passed by the environment agency, including a sequential test. As there are other options for housing in areas offered which are not in flood zone 3, then this application should fail, and other areas must be considered for housing which are not in flood Zone 3.
All other areas have not been considered which is evident by the lack of completion witihin SHLAA Proforma document.
Plus costs of necessary schools , transport , sustainability is too high.
NLR1 should not be considered as part of the area is in Flood Zone 3, a flood risk assessment (FRA)would have to be passed by the environment agency, including a sequential test. As there are other options for housing in areas offered which are not in flood zone 3, then this application should fail, and other areas must be considered for housing which are not in flood Zone 3.
All other areas have not been considered which is evident by the lack of completion witihin SHLAA Proforma document.
Plus costs of necessary schools , transport , sustainability is too high.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SWH4
Representation ID: 20047
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Bull Lane Development Group
Hullbridge is unable to take a further 500 properties, RDC has renegaded on the amount originaly intended for the village.
This would be the better option of the four, build by the supermarket and main road for ease of access. New build numbers must be limited. Hullbridge is unable to cope iwith schooling, transport, parking & access to and from the new homes.
Potholes, dust and lack of maintenance of unmade roads is a disgrace, and the busier the roads the dirtier the homes become.
Hullbridge is unable to take a further 500 properties, RDC has renegaded on the amount originaly intended for the village.
This would be the better option of the four, build by the supermarket and main road for ease of access. New build numbers must be limited. Hullbridge is unable to cope iwith schooling, transport, parking & access to and from the new homes.
Potholes, dust and lack of maintenance of unmade roads is a disgrace, and the busier the roads the dirtier the homes become.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SWH2
Representation ID: 20050
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Bull Lane Development Group
Hullbridge is unable to take a further 500 properties, RDC has renegaded on the amount originaly intended for the village.
To choose to buld here would affect much of the village. New build numbers must be limited. Hullbridge is unable to cope iwith schooling, transport, parking & access to and from the new homes.
The green belt enjoyed by many will be detroyed.
Hullbridge is unable to take a further 500 properties, RDC has renegaded on the amount originaly intended for the village.
To choose to buld here would affect much of the village. New build numbers must be limited. Hullbridge is unable to cope iwith schooling, transport, parking & access to and from the new homes.
The green belt enjoyed by many will be detroyed.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SWH3
Representation ID: 20052
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Bull Lane Development Group
Hullbridge is unable to take a further 500 properties, RDC has renegaded on the amount originaly intended for the village.
This option however , will cause more anxiety, as it wraps around so many of the houses, traffic for example down Grassmere Ave is a sinmgle track, and Windermere some single, all of the area considered is unmade. More traffic and dust.
New build numbers must be limited. Hullbridge is unable to cope iwith schooling, transport, parking & access to and from the new homes.
The green belt enjoyed by many will be detroyed.
Hullbridge is unable to take a further 500 properties, RDC has renegaded on the amount originaly intended for the village.
This option however , will cause more anxiety, as it wraps around so many of the houses, traffic for example down Grassmere Ave is a sinmgle track, and Windermere some single, all of the area considered is unmade. More traffic and dust.
New build numbers must be limited. Hullbridge is unable to cope iwith schooling, transport, parking & access to and from the new homes.
The green belt enjoyed by many will be detroyed.
