Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Search representations
Results for Natural England search
New searchComment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
South West Hullbridge 500 dwellings (250 between 2015 and 2021, and 250 post 2021)
Representation ID: 18899
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Natural England
Development at South west Hullbridge is close to the Crouch and Roach Estuaries SPA and Ramsar site and may, therefore, require assessment under The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 in relation to the potential increase in recreational pressure, especially by dog walkers.
Development at South west Hullbridge is close to the Crouch and Roach Estuaries SPA and Ramsar site and may, therefore, require assessment under The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 in relation to the potential increase in recreational pressure, especially by dog walkers.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Special Areas of Conservation
Representation ID: 18969
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Natural England
The penultimate sentence should refer to the Essex Estuaries as being an SAC rather than an SPA.
The penultimate sentence should refer to the Essex Estuaries as being an SAC rather than an SPA.
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Do you agree that the areas shown in Figure 4.3 and listed in Table 4.1 should be allocated as Local Wildlife Sites?
Representation ID: 18977
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Natural England
Natural England suppports the allocation as Local Wildlife Sites of the areas shown in Figure 4.3 and listed in Table 4.1.
Natural England suppports the allocation as Local Wildlife Sites of the areas shown in Figure 4.3 and listed in Table 4.1.
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Do you agree that the area shown in Figure 4.4 should be allocated as the Upper Roach Valley?
Representation ID: 18978
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Natural England
Natural England supports the allocation as the Upper Roach Valley of the area shown in Figure 4.4.
Natural England supports the allocation as the Upper Roach Valley of the area shown in Figure 4.4.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Which approach to the safeguarding of open space do you think would be most effective?
Representation ID: 18990
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Natural England
Natural England supports the allocation of the identified areas as Open Space, as per OS1. However, we believe that Rochford Council should also seek to safeguard additional areas of open space through the development management process on a case by case basis. Wherever possible, such additional open spaces should form part of a coherent multi-functional green infrastructure network.
Natural England supports the allocation of the identified areas as Open Space, as per OS1. However, we believe that Rochford Council should also seek to safeguard additional areas of open space through the development management process on a case by case basis. Wherever possible, such additional open spaces should form part of a coherent multi-functional green infrastructure network.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
South of Great Wakering
Representation ID: 19368
Received: 29/04/2010
Respondent: Natural England
The proposed employment area south of Great Wakering is likely to significantly reduce the visual separation between Great Wakering and North Shoebury, with the result that these two settlements may effectively coalesce. This would appear to be contrary to one of the primary purposes of the Green Belt. Such coalescence would also significantly reduce Great Wakering's identity and 'sense of place' as a largely self-contained community.
The proposed employment area south of Great Wakering is likely to significantly reduce the visual separation between Great Wakering and North Shoebury, with the result that these two settlements may effectively coalesce. This would appear to be contrary to one of the primary purposes of the Green Belt. Such coalescence would also significantly reduce Great Wakering's identity and 'sense of place' as a largely self-contained community.
