Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Search representations
Results for Chelmsford City Council search
New searchComment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option NLR1
Representation ID: 18908
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Chelmsford City Council
Residents in Battlesbridge could benefit from the new community services and facilities as part of the development although we note there is a number of existing site constraints.
Residents in Battlesbridge could benefit from the new community services and facilities as part of the development although we note there is a number of existing site constraints.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
GT - Are these the best locations to consider?
Representation ID: 18917
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Chelmsford City Council
Site options GT1, 2, 3 and 7 lie near to the CBC boundary. It would have been helpful if the DPD included information on the criteria used to select the proposed sites and more detail on how well the proposed sites perform in terms of access to services and any site constraints e.g. ground conditions, flood risk and land levels. As such, we feel unable to comment specifically on whether these proposed sites are in the most suitable locations. However, whatever site(s) are chosen, we would like to ensure that they are well designed and under good management.
Site options GT1, 2, 3 and 7 lie near to the CBC boundary. It would have been helpful if the DPD included information on the criteria used to select the proposed sites and more detail on how well the proposed sites perform in terms of access to services and any site constraints e.g. ground conditions, flood risk and land levels. As such, we feel unable to comment specifically on whether these proposed sites are in the most suitable locations. However, whatever site(s) are chosen, we would like to ensure that they are well designed and under good management.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option E17
Representation ID: 18923
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Chelmsford City Council
Residents in Battlesbridge could benefit from new employment opportunities created in this area at E13, 14, 15, 16 or 17. We raise no objections to these although we consider that E17 is too detached from other the existing employment area on the other side of the road.
If all the development (residential, employment and Gypsy and Traveller site) is promoted in the area west of Rayleigh/ south east of Rawreth, the cumulative impact on Battlesbridge would need to be carefully considered. Officers would not want to see any adverse impacts on this existing community.
Residents in Battlesbridge could benefit from new employment opportunities created in this area at E13, 14, 15, 16 or 17. We raise no objections to these although we consider that E17 is too detached from other the existing employment area on the other side of the road.
If all the development (residential, employment and Gypsy and Traveller site) is promoted in the area west of Rayleigh/ south east of Rawreth, the cumulative impact on Battlesbridge would need to be carefully considered. Officers would not want to see any adverse impacts on this existing community.
