Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Local Development Framework Allocations DPD

Thank you for allowing an extension on time for Rayleigh Town Council to submit its response to this consultation. We would like to congratulate Rochford District Council for the care and diligence taken in preparing this document. We also recognise the creation of this document has provoked many unfair criticisms. It must be recognised by all interested parties that these plans have been required by the Government under the auspices of the East of England Regional Assembly (an unelected quango) creating both socially and politically difficult circumstances.

It is the Town Council's opinion that in principal we totalling reject the validity of an unelected body to impose targets on the peoples elected representatives, such as 550 dwellings required to be built in the town of Rayleigh between now and 2021. We are therefore forced to acknowledge these basic democratic principals have been replaced by a dictatorial quango, made legal by the Government, which runs roughshod over local requirements. Given these circumstances, finding the least worst, best option is the best we can do.

We were heartened to hear that the PPS3 requirements had changed, due to vigorous lobbying by Rochford District Council to lengthen the time required to accommodate the 3,790 dwellings, this will now run till 2031, giving an average requirement build of 126 properties per year.

The Town Council having studied the various options on offer, considered site NLR5, to be the least worst, due to its ease of access to either the A129 or Rawreth Lane. It is important to maintain current sporting facilities and if option NLR5 is selected Rochford District Council must ensure that Rayleigh Town Sports and Social Club is allowed to remain at its existing site. The Town Council also feels that emphasis should be placed on co-ordinated infrastructure. With such a huge development, especially in an area through which streams run and the threat of flooding is highlighted on the Environment Agency's own research documents. Clear, concise provisions for sewerage removal and proper drainage must be put in place, even at the expense of the contractor replacing old sewerage and drainage in the area of Rawreth Lane and London Road, as a condition of the contract to build. As well as good public open spaces, youth and community facilities, a viable road and public transport system must be in place, enabling continuity and through flow of an enlarged Rayleigh population.

The East of England Regional Assembly in their East of England plan, require Rochford District Council to provide 18 pitches for Gypsies and Travellers. We acknowledge this has proved a most contentious issue in the area. The Town Council being aware of possible future problems does not wish to accept traveller sites in the district but if this is unavoidable the provision of traveller sites should be spread throughout the district and not located in one area.

The Town Council wishes to emphasise the need to attract high quality employers to the area, so the possible redevelopment of site E7 as a possible "signature industrial site" at the junction of Rayleigh Weir is extremely attractive to the further enhancement of the Town. The Town Council supports E18 (Michelins Farm) as a suitable location for a relocated Rawreth Industrial Estate. The surrounding area has fantastic housing stock and attracting high spec businesses, with the real opportunity to offer some of the finest education, healthcare, and general high quality of life in the UK, must be at the forefront of any initial planning.

This town is in a unique position to attract high quality employers, as well as having the schools to provide high quality students.
Investing in a progressive promotional programme, linking schools and high tech industries could open a new age in apprenticeships. These positive qualities should be promoted to ensure the health, wealth and well being of the residents of Rayleigh and Rochford District as a whole.

The Town Council, though acknowledging the need for houses, feels the loss of Green Belt to 2745 new dwellings in the District needs reviewing. The recent volcanic eruption in Iceland, which is continuing to have such an
adverse economical effect, is a reminder that we are an island, and we should not be giving up valuable land which could be used for food
production in the event of a national emergency. Once the land is concreted over it is lost forever. we would urge our District Councillors to seriously question these targets at this present time.

Please contact me if you require clarification of any of these points.

Local Development Framework Allocations DPD

Thank you for allowing an extension on time for Rayleigh Town Council to submit its response to this consultation. We would like to congratulate Rochford District Council for the care and diligence taken in preparing this document. We also recognise the creation of this document has provoked many unfair criticisms. It must be recognised by all interested parties that these plans have been required by the Government under the auspices of the East of England Regional Assembly (an unelected quango) creating both socially and politically difficult circumstances.

It is the Town Council's opinion that in principal we totalling reject the validity of an unelected body to impose targets on the peoples elected representatives, such as 550 dwellings required to be built in the town of Rayleigh between now and 2021. We are therefore forced to acknowledge these basic democratic principals have been replaced by a dictatorial quango, made legal by the Government, which runs roughshod over local requirements. Given these circumstances, finding the least worst, best option is the best we can do.

We were heartened to hear that the PPS3 requirements had changed, due to vigorous lobbying by Rochford District Council to lengthen the time required to accommodate the 3,790 dwellings, this will now run till 2031, giving an average requirement build of 126 properties per year.

The Town Council having studied the various options on offer, considered site NLR5, to be the least worst, due to its ease of access to either the A129 or Rawreth Lane. It is important to maintain current sporting facilities and if option NLR5 is selected Rochford District Council must ensure that Rayleigh Town Sports and Social Club is allowed to remain at its existing site. The Town Council also feels that emphasis should be placed on co-ordinated infrastructure. With such a huge development, especially in an area through which streams run and the threat of flooding is highlighted on the Environment Agency's own research documents. Clear, concise provisions for sewerage removal and proper drainage must be put in place, even at the expense of the contractor replacing old sewerage and drainage in the area of Rawreth Lane and London Road, as a condition of the contract to build. As well as good public open spaces, youth and community facilities, a viable road and public transport system must be in place, enabling continuity and through flow of an enlarged Rayleigh population.

The East of England Regional Assembly in their East of England plan, require Rochford District Council to provide 18 pitches for Gypsies and Travellers. We acknowledge this has proved a most contentious issue in the area. The Town Council being aware of possible future problems does not wish to accept traveller sites in the district but if this is unavoidable the provision of traveller sites should be spread throughout the district and not located in one area.

The Town Council wishes to emphasise the need to attract high quality employers to the area, so the possible redevelopment of site E7 as a possible "signature industrial site" at the junction of Rayleigh Weir is extremely attractive to the further enhancement of the Town. The Town Council supports E18 (Michelins Farm) as a suitable location for a relocated Rawreth Industrial Estate. The surrounding area has fantastic housing stock and attracting high spec businesses, with the real opportunity to offer some of the finest education, healthcare, and general high quality of life in the UK, must be at the forefront of any initial planning.

This town is in a unique position to attract high quality employers, as well as having the schools to provide high quality students.
Investing in a progressive promotional programme, linking schools and high tech industries could open a new age in apprenticeships. These positive qualities should be promoted to ensure the health, wealth and well being of the residents of Rayleigh and Rochford District as a whole.

The Town Council, though acknowledging the need for houses, feels the loss of Green Belt to 2745 new dwellings in the District needs reviewing. The recent volcanic eruption in Iceland, which is continuing to have such an
adverse economical effect, is a reminder that we are an island, and we should not be giving up valuable land which could be used for food
production in the event of a national emergency. Once the land is concreted over it is lost forever. we would urge our District Councillors to seriously question these targets at this present time.

Please contact me if you require clarification of any of these points.

Local Development Framework Allocations DPD

Thank you for allowing an extension on time for Rayleigh Town Council to submit its response to this consultation. We would like to congratulate Rochford District Council for the care and diligence taken in preparing this document. We also recognise the creation of this document has provoked many unfair criticisms. It must be recognised by all interested parties that these plans have been required by the Government under the auspices of the East of England Regional Assembly (an unelected quango) creating both socially and politically difficult circumstances.

It is the Town Council's opinion that in principal we totalling reject the validity of an unelected body to impose targets on the peoples elected representatives, such as 550 dwellings required to be built in the town of Rayleigh between now and 2021. We are therefore forced to acknowledge these basic democratic principals have been replaced by a dictatorial quango, made legal by the Government, which runs roughshod over local requirements. Given these circumstances, finding the least worst, best option is the best we can do.

We were heartened to hear that the PPS3 requirements had changed, due to vigorous lobbying by Rochford District Council to lengthen the time required to accommodate the 3,790 dwellings, this will now run till 2031, giving an average requirement build of 126 properties per year.

The Town Council having studied the various options on offer, considered site NLR5, to be the least worst, due to its ease of access to either the A129 or Rawreth Lane. It is important to maintain current sporting facilities and if option NLR5 is selected Rochford District Council must ensure that Rayleigh Town Sports and Social Club is allowed to remain at its existing site. The Town Council also feels that emphasis should be placed on co-ordinated infrastructure. With such a huge development, especially in an area through which streams run and the threat of flooding is highlighted on the Environment Agency's own research documents. Clear, concise provisions for sewerage removal and proper drainage must be put in place, even at the expense of the contractor replacing old sewerage and drainage in the area of Rawreth Lane and London Road, as a condition of the contract to build. As well as good public open spaces, youth and community facilities, a viable road and public transport system must be in place, enabling continuity and through flow of an enlarged Rayleigh population.

The East of England Regional Assembly in their East of England plan, require Rochford District Council to provide 18 pitches for Gypsies and Travellers. We acknowledge this has proved a most contentious issue in the area. The Town Council being aware of possible future problems does not wish to accept traveller sites in the district but if this is unavoidable the provision of traveller sites should be spread throughout the district and not located in one area.

The Town Council wishes to emphasise the need to attract high quality employers to the area, so the possible redevelopment of site E7 as a possible "signature industrial site" at the junction of Rayleigh Weir is extremely attractive to the further enhancement of the Town. The Town Council supports E18 (Michelins Farm) as a suitable location for a relocated Rawreth Industrial Estate. The surrounding area has fantastic housing stock and attracting high spec businesses, with the real opportunity to offer some of the finest education, healthcare, and general high quality of life in the UK, must be at the forefront of any initial planning.

This town is in a unique position to attract high quality employers, as well as having the schools to provide high quality students.
Investing in a progressive promotional programme, linking schools and high tech industries could open a new age in apprenticeships. These positive qualities should be promoted to ensure the health, wealth and well being of the residents of Rayleigh and Rochford District as a whole.

The Town Council, though acknowledging the need for houses, feels the loss of Green Belt to 2745 new dwellings in the District needs reviewing. The recent volcanic eruption in Iceland, which is continuing to have such an
adverse economical effect, is a reminder that we are an island, and we should not be giving up valuable land which could be used for food
production in the event of a national emergency. Once the land is concreted over it is lost forever. we would urge our District Councillors to seriously question these targets at this present time.

Please contact me if you require clarification of any of these points.

Local Development Framework Allocations DPD

Thank you for allowing an extension on time for Rayleigh Town Council to submit its response to this consultation. We would like to congratulate Rochford District Council for the care and diligence taken in preparing this document. We also recognise the creation of this document has provoked many unfair criticisms. It must be recognised by all interested parties that these plans have been required by the Government under the auspices of the East of England Regional Assembly (an unelected quango) creating both socially and politically difficult circumstances.

It is the Town Council's opinion that in principal we totalling reject the validity of an unelected body to impose targets on the peoples elected representatives, such as 550 dwellings required to be built in the town of Rayleigh between now and 2021. We are therefore forced to acknowledge these basic democratic principals have been replaced by a dictatorial quango, made legal by the Government, which runs roughshod over local requirements. Given these circumstances, finding the least worst, best option is the best we can do.

We were heartened to hear that the PPS3 requirements had changed, due to vigorous lobbying by Rochford District Council to lengthen the time required to accommodate the 3,790 dwellings, this will now run till 2031, giving an average requirement build of 126 properties per year.

The Town Council having studied the various options on offer, considered site NLR5, to be the least worst, due to its ease of access to either the A129 or Rawreth Lane. It is important to maintain current sporting facilities and if option NLR5 is selected Rochford District Council must ensure that Rayleigh Town Sports and Social Club is allowed to remain at its existing site. The Town Council also feels that emphasis should be placed on co-ordinated infrastructure. With such a huge development, especially in an area through which streams run and the threat of flooding is highlighted on the Environment Agency's own research documents. Clear, concise provisions for sewerage removal and proper drainage must be put in place, even at the expense of the contractor replacing old sewerage and drainage in the area of Rawreth Lane and London Road, as a condition of the contract to build. As well as good public open spaces, youth and community facilities, a viable road and public transport system must be in place, enabling continuity and through flow of an enlarged Rayleigh population.

The East of England Regional Assembly in their East of England plan, require Rochford District Council to provide 18 pitches for Gypsies and Travellers. We acknowledge this has proved a most contentious issue in the area. The Town Council being aware of possible future problems does not wish to accept traveller sites in the district but if this is unavoidable the provision of traveller sites should be spread throughout the district and not located in one area.

The Town Council wishes to emphasise the need to attract high quality employers to the area, so the possible redevelopment of site E7 as a possible "signature industrial site" at the junction of Rayleigh Weir is extremely attractive to the further enhancement of the Town. The Town Council supports E18 (Michelins Farm) as a suitable location for a relocated Rawreth Industrial Estate. The surrounding area has fantastic housing stock and attracting high spec businesses, with the real opportunity to offer some of the finest education, healthcare, and general high quality of life in the UK, must be at the forefront of any initial planning.

This town is in a unique position to attract high quality employers, as well as having the schools to provide high quality students.
Investing in a progressive promotional programme, linking schools and high tech industries could open a new age in apprenticeships. These positive qualities should be promoted to ensure the health, wealth and well being of the residents of Rayleigh and Rochford District as a whole.

The Town Council, though acknowledging the need for houses, feels the loss of Green Belt to 2745 new dwellings in the District needs reviewing. The recent volcanic eruption in Iceland, which is continuing to have such an
adverse economical effect, is a reminder that we are an island, and we should not be giving up valuable land which could be used for food
production in the event of a national emergency. Once the land is concreted over it is lost forever. we would urge our District Councillors to seriously question these targets at this present time.

Please contact me if you require clarification of any of these points.