Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Search representations

Results for A W Squier Limited search

New search New search

Support

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

South East Ashingdon 500 dwellings

Representation ID: 19532

Received: 29/04/2010

Respondent: A W Squier Limited

Agent: Andrew Martin Associates

Representation Summary:

We support a residential allocation in the location known by the Council as "South East Ashingdon". However we have identified an alternative site option which we call Option SEA4.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Option SEA1

Representation ID: 19534

Received: 29/04/2010

Respondent: A W Squier Limited

Agent: Andrew Martin Associates

Representation Summary:

This site is insufficient to accommodate 500 dwellings with the necessary infrastructure, other uses and landscape buffer. Therefore we identify an alternative site SEA4.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Option SEA2

Representation ID: 19535

Received: 29/04/2010

Respondent: A W Squier Limited

Agent: Andrew Martin Associates

Representation Summary:

This site is unlikely to be able to comfortably accommodate 500 dwellings and therefore a larger site should be identified.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Option SEA3

Representation ID: 19536

Received: 29/04/2010

Respondent: A W Squier Limited

Agent: Andrew Martin Associates

Representation Summary:

OPTION SEA3

This site is similar to, but smaller than site SEA2. It is around 13 hectares and can only accommodate around 300 to 400 dwellings, and would therefore fail to achieve the number of dwellings identified in the Core Strategy.

The comments in relation to SEA2 above also apply to option SEA3.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

SEA - Are these the right options for this location?

Representation ID: 19539

Received: 29/04/2010

Respondent: A W Squier Limited

Agent: Andrew Martin Associates

Representation Summary:

In accordance with our other representations we do not believe that the most appropriate site has been identified. We propose an alternative site which we call SEA4.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

SEA - Should other sites be considered?

Representation ID: 19540

Received: 29/04/2010

Respondent: A W Squier Limited

Agent: Andrew Martin Associates

Representation Summary:

Of the three options submitted, Option SEA1 and SEA2 are the most appropriate, but should be combined to ensure that the site allocated is of a sufficient size to ensure that the housing requirement for this broad location is met.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.