Hockley Area Action Plan - Issues and Options

Search representations

Results for Barratt Eastern Counties search

New search New search

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan - Issues and Options

2.4 LAND USES

Representation ID: 9268

Received: 28/04/2009

Respondent: Barratt Eastern Counties

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

We strongly agree that the Eldon Way Industrial Estate provides a customer base for the town centre.In fact it underpins the vitality and viability of the town centre.It is a highly sustainable employment site and to encourage other alternate uses would be inherently unsustainable and an unsound approach. The Eldon Way site should continue as a predominantly employment based land use, albeit a more appropriate mix of employment type uses.This section should highlight the Eldon Way Industrial Estate as the towns premier employment area.

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan - Issues and Options

2.4 LAND USES

Representation ID: 9270

Received: 28/04/2009

Respondent: Barratt Eastern Counties

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

We agree that the town centre has a poor retail offer and recognise that some redevelopment commensurate with the town centre and settlement is necessary. It is not appropriate to redevelop the whole of the Eldon Way Industrial Estate for non employment uses as this will undermine Hockley's sustainable development credentials and undermine the viability of the Town Centre.

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan - Issues and Options

3.2 OBJECTIVES

Representation ID: 9273

Received: 28/04/2009

Respondent: Barratt Eastern Counties

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

The objectives are incomplete and as such there is a danger that the strategy that will be developed becomes flawed. The objectives provide no commentary on the important role of the employment uses of the Eldon Way Industrial Estate to the town centre and wider area. The vision statement includes a comment about the town centre being a place to 'live and work' yet the objectives do not. This needs to be reconsidered for reasons of soundness.

We agree that there needs to be improved retail facilities and a new focal point in the town centre.

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan - Issues and Options

3.2 OBJECTIVES

Representation ID: 9276

Received: 28/04/2009

Respondent: Barratt Eastern Counties

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

The current drafting of 3.2.3 demonstrate limited understanding of the role of the Eldon Way Industrial Estate in terms of creating a sustainable settlement and underpinning the town centre as a place to work. 'More valuable and appropriate uses' could include removal of all employment uses and this would run counter to the sustainability principles which guide planning. Noisy and polluting industry should be replaced by offices, light industry, workshops and Hi tech employment rather than high levels of residential/leisure uses.

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan - Issues and Options

3.3 POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITY SITES

Representation ID: 9279

Received: 28/04/2009

Respondent: Barratt Eastern Counties

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

Reference is made to compulsory purchase but in too little detail. The AAP needs to explain the process, cost and delivery period. It needs to explain the level of public funding to pump prime the process and how mitigation for development of this brownfield area will be funded.The AAP needs to confirm whether an EIA is necessary and whether the Council will lead the planning application process. The cost and timing will require that the regeneration be phased toward the end of the Plan period.

Support

Hockley Area Action Plan - Issues and Options

3.3 POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITY SITES

Representation ID: 9281

Received: 28/04/2009

Respondent: Barratt Eastern Counties

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 3.3.2 to 3.3.6

For the purposes of this Issues and Options review, identifying the sites as A to H is a suitable way of identifying key land areas that could feature in one or more of the options under consideration. Sites A1, A2 and A3 would logically be suitable for primarily Town Centre uses including retail, leisure and the civic square. These sites are closest to the central town centre along a road identified as needing regeneration. Some office could be included at upper floor levels.

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan - Issues and Options

3.3 POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITY SITES

Representation ID: 9283

Received: 28/04/2009

Respondent: Barratt Eastern Counties

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

Object to the suggestion that the Eldon Way Industrial Estate be replaced by more appropriate/valuable uses. Whilst more appropriate employment uses would be acceptable, alternative uses which diminish the employment base would not. The reasons for this are that the site is critical in ensuring Hockley is a sustainable settlement and for the role the estate provides in underpinning the town centre. Employment uses should be largely maintained with some regeneration focused near the Town Centre.

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan - Issues and Options

3.4 DEVELOPMENT OPTION 1.1 AND 1.2

Representation ID: 9285

Received: 28/04/2009

Respondent: Barratt Eastern Counties

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

Of the 6 options a variant of option 1.2 (option 1.3) would appear to be appropriate. This entails a twin strategy of promoting regeneration in areas A1, A2 and A3 plus some redevelopment of area B and C. Secondly promoting a policy framework for the rest of the Eldon Way Estate which promotes new employment development (light industry, offices and Hi tech users. Significant residential development would undermine this important employment site. A more focused regeneration area is more readily achievable for the necessary retail/leisure and small amount of residential.

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan - Issues and Options

3.4 DEVELOPMENT OPTION 1.1 AND 1.2

Representation ID: 9286

Received: 28/04/2009

Respondent: Barratt Eastern Counties

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

Option 1.1

The additional residential units proposed under this option would inevitably lead to the loss of employment land. However, for the reasons noted elsewhere in these representations that would not be a sustainable approach. Residents would need to commute out of Hockley to access any replacement employment sites thus contributing to car journeys. The customer base, which the town centre relies on, would also be undermined.

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan - Issues and Options

3.5 DEVELOPMENT OPTION 2.1 AND 2.2

Representation ID: 9288

Received: 28/04/2009

Respondent: Barratt Eastern Counties

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

Redevelopment of most of Eldon Way for alternative uses to employment would undermine the sustainability principles which now guide planning decisions. It would be contrary to PPG4 and PPG13.The loss of employment would result in the loss of a customer base to the town centre. Residents would commute out to work whereas employees spent within the town centre.There is no explanation how the regeneration of this large area will be delivered and over what time and at what cost.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.