London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Search representations
Results for George Crozer search
New searchObject
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Q4.9 What do you see as the greatest potential impact of development in the JAAP and how can this be mitigated?
Representation ID: 2232
Received: 08/08/2008
Respondent: George Crozer
FoNKM objects to the proposed expansion plans due to the contribution it will make to climate change and the impacts this will have on biodiversity
As the UK is committed to a reduction in greenhouse gas emmissions we do not see how any development of the airport in the JAAP can possibly be mitigated. Aviation is the fastest growing sector in terms of UK emissions, and the European Commission points out if current growth continues emissions from international flights from EU airports will have grown by 150% from 1990-2012.
National, regional and local government need to act to prevent damaging climate change
FoNKM objects to the proposed expansion plans due to the contribution it will make to climate change and the impacts this will have on biodiversity
As the UK is committed to a reduction in greenhouse gas emmissions we do not see how any development of the airport in the JAAP can possibly be mitigated. Aviation is the fastest growing sector in terms of UK emissions, and the European Commission points out if current growth continues emissions from international flights from EU airports will have grown by 150% from 1990-2012.
National, regional and local government need to act to prevent damaging climate change
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
5.1 Introduction
Representation ID: 2233
Received: 08/08/2008
Respondent: George Crozer
FoNKM objects to the fact that there is no opportunity to opt for NO expansion of the airport
We are not obliged to cater for the predicted demand for air travel. The sector makes a disproportionate contribution to climate change and should be included in targets for cutting emissions There should not be an assumption that there is a requirement to develop the airport at all Options 1, 11 and 111 will undoubtedly act as drivers for increased CO2 emissions at a time when national, regional and local government should be acting to prevent damaging climate
FoNKM objects to the fact that there is no opportunity to opt for NO expansion of the airport
We are not obliged to cater for the predicted demand for air travel. The sector makes a disproportionate contribution to climate change and should be included in targets for cutting emissions There should not be an assumption that there is a requirement to develop the airport at all Options 1, 11 and 111 will undoubtedly act as drivers for increased CO2 emissions at a time when national, regional and local government should be acting to prevent damaging climate
Support
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
5.2 Scenario 1: Low Growth (do minimum)
Representation ID: 2235
Received: 08/08/2008
Respondent: George Crozer
of the options presented this is the only one that FoNKM might possibly support
However we wish to qualify this by stating that we are not obliged to cater for the predicted demand for air travel. The sector makes a disproportionate contribution to climate change and should be included in targets for cutting emissions There should not be an assumption that there is a requirement to develop the airport
Options 1, 11 and 111 will undoubtedly act as drivers for increased CO2 emissions at a time when national, regional and local government should act to prevent damaging climate change.
of the options presented this is the only one that FoNKM might possibly support
However we wish to qualify this by stating that we are not obliged to cater for the predicted demand for air travel. The sector makes a disproportionate contribution to climate change and should be included in targets for cutting emissions There should not be an assumption that there is a requirement to develop the airport
Options 1, 11 and 111 will undoubtedly act as drivers for increased CO2 emissions at a time when national, regional and local government should act to prevent damaging climate change.
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
5.3 Scenario 2(a): Medium Growth
Representation ID: 2237
Received: 08/08/2008
Respondent: George Crozer
FoNKM object to this option
FoNKM object to this option
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
5.5 Scenario 3: High Growth
Representation ID: 2238
Received: 08/08/2008
Respondent: George Crozer
FoNKM is totally opposed to this option
and to any runway expansion
Aviation is the fastest growing sector in terms of UK emissions, and the European Commission points out if current growth continues emissions from international flights from EU airports will have grown by 150% from 1990-2012
It is time for local, regional and national government to act to prevent damaging climate change
FoNKM is totally opposed to this option
and to any runway expansion
Aviation is the fastest growing sector in terms of UK emissions, and the European Commission points out if current growth continues emissions from international flights from EU airports will have grown by 150% from 1990-2012
It is time for local, regional and national government to act to prevent damaging climate change
