London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper

Search representations

Results for Tabor Farms Ltd search

New search New search

Support

London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper

Q3.1 Do you agree with the overall Vision for the JAAP?

Representation ID: 1997

Received: 07/08/2008

Respondent: Tabor Farms Ltd

Agent: Whirledge & Nott

Representation Summary:

Yes

Full text:

Yes

Comment

London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper

Q4.2 How can the airport best be developed to drive and support the local economy?

Representation ID: 1999

Received: 07/08/2008

Respondent: Tabor Farms Ltd

Agent: Whirledge & Nott

Representation Summary:

The airport should be allowed to expand from its current limits to provide additional employment within the District. To limit growth to the status quo would result in a lack of inward investment into the District.

Full text:

The airport should be allowed to expand from its current limits to provide additional employment within the District. To limit growth to the status quo would result in a lack of inward investment into the District.

Support

London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper

Q4.7 Should the Green Belt be considered for revision? If so how should it be revised?

Representation ID: 2001

Received: 07/08/2008

Respondent: Tabor Farms Ltd

Agent: Whirledge & Nott

Representation Summary:

To enable wider growth within the airport it is essential that the Green Belt boundary be revised. It is important that areas that are under utilised adjacent to the airport can be included within the boundary to enable improved development. In particular the area of land east of the railway adjacent to Southend Road should be included in the Airport boundary and not retailed as Green Belt. As owners of this land we would support its release from the Green Belt

Full text:

To enable wider growth within the airport it is essential that the Green Belt boundary be revised. It is important that areas that are under utilised adjacent to the airport can be included within the boundary to enable improved development. In particular the area of land east of the railway adjacent to Southend Road should be included in the Airport boundary and not retailed as Green Belt. As owners of this land we would support its release from the Green Belt

Comment

London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper

Q4.11 How can a shift from car use to other modes of transport be achieved?

Representation ID: 2002

Received: 07/08/2008

Respondent: Tabor Farms Ltd

Agent: Whirledge & Nott

Representation Summary:

In order for growth to occur within the airport it is essential that transport links are improved to the airport. Emphasis should be placed on non-car traffic and therefore improvements to the rail links is essential in this location.

Full text:

In order for growth to occur within the airport it is essential that transport links are improved to the airport. Emphasis should be placed on non-car traffic and therefore improvements to the rail links is essential in this location.

Support

London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper

Q4.12 Do you agree with the proposed areas for change?

Representation ID: 2007

Received: 07/08/2008

Respondent: Tabor Farms Ltd

Agent: Whirledge & Nott

Representation Summary:

We strongly agree with the proposed area for change particularly area ix. The land east of the railway line is poor amenity value land and does not offer any strategic benefit in terms of Green Belt objectives. Such land should be included within the airport development boundary and be removed from the Green Belt. Given the proximity of this land to the railway and airport terminal it would be sensible to be used for transport/interchange development or industrial use. We would not wish to see this retained as open space as it has poor amenity value.

Full text:

We strongly agree with the proposed area for change particularly area ix. The land east of the railway line is poor amenity value land and does not offer any strategic benefit in terms of Green Belt objectives. Such land should be included within the airport development boundary and be removed from the Green Belt. Given the proximity of this land to the railway and airport terminal it would be sensible to be used for transport/interchange development or industrial use. We would not wish to see this retained as open space as it has poor amenity value.

Support

London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper

Q5.1 Which is your preferred Scenario for the future of the Southend Airport area?

Representation ID: 2012

Received: 07/08/2008

Respondent: Tabor Farms Ltd

Agent: Whirledge & Nott

Representation Summary:

Support for medium or large scale growth with re-defining of the Green Belt boundary to enable effective new development in this area.

Full text:

Support for medium or large scale growth with re-defining of the Green Belt boundary to enable effective new development in this area.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.