19-21 Bellingham Lane
Object
Local List SPD - Discussion & Consultation Document
Representation ID: 27880
Received: 28/03/2011
Respondent: Louis Drive Estate Residents Association
It would be a shame to lose all the old buildings in this road especially if they were replaced by modern monstrocities
It would be a shame to lose all the old buildings in this road especially if they were replaced by modern monstrocities
Support
Local List SPD - Discussion & Consultation Document
Representation ID: 27909
Received: 04/05/2011
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Agree
Agree
Support
Local List SPD - Discussion & Consultation Document
Representation ID: 27911
Received: 04/05/2011
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Agree
Agree
Object
Local List SPD - Discussion & Consultation Document
Representation ID: 27962
Received: 04/05/2011
Respondent: The National Trust Rayleigh Mount Local Committee
Page 158
I object to nos. 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29 and 31 Bellingham Lane not being included in the Local List.
Reasons why they should be in the Local List:
1). Bellingham Lane is a key historical area of Rayleigh, containing both the Windmill and the Mount. These buildings enhance the character of the road.
2). They were built around the same time as the railway line, and are part of the transition of Rayleigh from market town to commuter town.
Page 158
I object to nos. 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29 and 31 Bellingham Lane not being included in the Local List.
Reasons why they should be in the Local List:
1). Bellingham Lane is a key historical area of Rayleigh, containing both the Windmill and the Mount. These buildings enhance the character of the road.
2). They were built around the same time as the railway line, and are part of the transition of Rayleigh from market town to commuter town.
Object
Local List SPD - Discussion & Consultation Document
Representation ID: 28130
Received: 06/05/2011
Respondent: Hawkwell Parish Council
Disagree. Should be included.
19-21 Bellingham Lane - Disagree. Should be included.
23 Bellingham Lane - Disagree. Should be included.
25-27 Bellingham Lane - Disagree. Should be retained.
29-31 Bellingham Lane - Disagree. Should be included.
Public Toilets - Agree
Christ Church United Reform Church - Agree
Rayleigh Methodist Church - Agree
Flemings Farm House - Agree
The Paul Pry Pub - Agree
Rayleigh House - Agree
Harvester Pub - Disagree. Local landmark, should be included.
4 High Street - Agree
The Half Moon Pub - Agree
7 High Street - Agree
20-22 High Street - Agree
92 High Street - Agree
94 High Street - Agree
96-100 High Street - Agree. Should be included.
Former Westminster Bank - Agree. Should be included.
K6 Telephone Box - Agree. Should be included.
The Salvation Army - Agree. Should be included.
Former Post Office - Agree. Should be included.
20-22 High Road - Agree. Should be included.
46 & 48 Hockley Road - Disagree. Should be included.
Brooklands - Disagree. Striking building, should be included.
Rayleigh County Junior & Infant School - Agree. Should be included.
Rayleigh Railway Station & Platform - Disagree. Should be included.
Footbridge at Rayleigh Station - Agree
Fingerpost - Agree. Should be included.