Policy T6 - Cycling and Walking
Support
Core Strategy Submission Document
Representation ID: 15706
Received: 21/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Sue Malin
when making these consideration, would you please also remember the people who use mobility scooters, the new developement on the old hospital grounds, from the new library to the main road, can be difficult to use, as only one side has pavement and dropped curb.
when making these consideration, would you please also remember the people who use mobility scooters, the new developement on the old hospital grounds, from the new library to the main road, can be difficult to use, as only one side has pavement and dropped curb.
Support
Core Strategy Submission Document
Representation ID: 16141
Received: 01/11/2009
Respondent: Mr David Fryer-Kelsey
The residents of Hockley have already requested the provision of cycle lanes and appropriate access points - Hockley to Rayleigh and Hockley to Rochford and to all schools in Hockley. The response is that there is no space for continuous stretches.
Space will not magically appear so it is not possible for this part of the Core Strategy to be implemented.
The residents of Hockley have already requested the provision of cycle lanes and appropriate access points - Hockley to Rayleigh and Hockley to Rochford and to all schools in Hockley. The response is that there is no space for continuous stretches.
Space will not magically appear so it is not possible for this part of the Core Strategy to be implemented.
Support
Core Strategy Submission Document
Representation ID: 16156
Received: 01/11/2009
Respondent: mr alistir matthews
More thought needs to be put to provision of cycling and walking .For example it states that watery lane and beeches road are to be improved to take extra traffic from hullbridge this will be in direct conflict with the stated intention to direct cyclists down these roads on a sustrans network .It is already too dangerous to cycle safely down there .There is also conflict with pedestrians as there is no path or refuge leading from a footpath from hullbridge to battlesbridge until the seawall is open for access under new legislation .
More thought needs to be put to provision of cycling and walking .For example it states that watery lane and beeches road are to be improved to take extra traffic from hullbridge this will be in direct conflict with the stated intention to direct cyclists down these roads on a sustrans network .It is already too dangerous to cycle safely down there .There is also conflict with pedestrians as there is no path or refuge leading from a footpath from hullbridge to battlesbridge until the seawall is open for access under new legislation .
Support
Core Strategy Submission Document
Representation ID: 16184
Received: 02/11/2009
Respondent: Pond Chase Nurseries Ltd
Agent: Boyer Planning Ltd
We support this policy since the provision of facilities for cycling and walking would be consistent with proposals for the development of Pond Chase Nursery site. The developer of the site will work with the relevant authorities including SUSTRANS to make provision for cycle routes through the site to link to existing and proposed cycling facilities within the West Hockley area.
We support this policy since the provision of facilities for cycling and walking would be consistent with proposals for the development of Pond Chase Nursery site. The developer of the site will work with the relevant authorities including SUSTRANS to make provision for cycle routes through the site to link to existing and proposed cycling facilities within the West Hockley area.
Support
Core Strategy Submission Document
Representation ID: 16238
Received: 02/11/2009
Respondent: Countryside Properties (Southern) Ltd
We agree with the principles of this policy. However, the scale of any contributions towards such initiatives should of course reasonably relate to the impact of the development of the land in question. Circular 5/05 and the emerging/published DCLG guidance on the use of CIL, makes it clear that new developments/contributions from new development can not be used to resolve existing deficiencies (only, proportionally, those deficiencies made worse by new development).
The extent of contributions should be determined at the time at which a masterplan or development brief is prepared for a site.
We agree with the principles of this policy. However, the scale of any contributions towards such initiatives should of course reasonably relate to the impact of the development of the land in question. Circular 5/05 and the emerging/published DCLG guidance on the use of CIL, makes it clear that new developments/contributions from new development can not be used to resolve existing deficiencies (only, proportionally, those deficiencies made worse by new development).
The extent of contributions should be determined at the time at which a masterplan or development brief is prepared for a site.
Support
Core Strategy Submission Document
Representation ID: 16389
Received: 22/10/2009
Respondent: Aber Ltd
Agent: Colliers International
The provision of a safe and convenient network of cycle and pedestrian routes linking homes with workplace, services and town centres will encourage people to travel by means other that the private car.
The provision of a safe and convenient network of cycle and pedestrian routes linking homes with workplace, services and town centres will encourage people to travel by means other that the private car.