4.18

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Object

Core Strategy Submission Document

Representation ID: 15857

Received: 14/10/2009

Respondent: Mr John Leech

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Your plan to build 770 more homes between London Road and Rawreth Lane is frankly ridiculous. I have been a resident here for 18 years and I have watched thousands of homes, added year after year. The area cannot cope with 1 more home let alone 770!

This is unsound. Farmland must not be built upon . Rayleigh (Rawreth) is doomed with this unrestricted sprawl and there now seems to be no natural stopping point until you have built right up to the A130. The local Roads will not cope and all identity will be lost

Full text:

Your plan to build 770 more homes between London Road and Rawreth Lane is frankly ridiculous. I have been a resident here for 18 years and I have watched thousands of homes, added year after year. The area cannot cope with 1 more home let alone 770!

This is unsound. Farmland must not be built upon . Rayleigh (Rawreth) is doomed with this unrestricted sprawl and there now seems to be no natural stopping point until you have built right up to the A130. The local Roads will not cope and all identity will be lost

Object

Core Strategy Submission Document

Representation ID: 15873

Received: 18/10/2009

Respondent: mr Jon wetherell

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

As the area has seen high levels of new housing over recent years Rawreth lane has steadily become oveloaded with high traffic levels at peak times and constant traffic throughout the day. The lack of any increase in facilites in the area also means that this development can not be supported.

Full text:

As the area has seen high levels of new housing over recent years Rawreth lane has steadily become oveloaded with high traffic levels at peak times and constant traffic throughout the day. The lack of any increase in facilites in the area also means that this development can not be supported.

Object

Core Strategy Submission Document

Representation ID: 15932

Received: 30/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Stone

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Why should Rawreth be forced to absorb 800 of the 1785 dwellings to year 2021. 800 greenbelt, 220 brownfield. Total
1020. Current dwellings in Rawreth 373 which equates to 270% increase. Totally out of proportion to any other town or parish in district.
*** I disagree with these summaries, please read the full submission.

Full text:

When you study the facts, that of the 1785 dwellings proposed in the Rochford District to the year 2021 (excluding brown-field additions), the Rawreth Parish will have to absorb 800 from the basic housing allocation, all on Green Belt released land, and a massive total of 1020 dwellings when the 220 on Brown-Field at the Rawreth Industrial Estate are included.
Currently there are just 373 dwellings in Rawreth and no other town, village or settlement in the district has been allocated such an unfair increase. This scale of this development, which equates to an increase in Rawreth, of approximately 270%, is totally out of proportion to what any other town or parish in the district has been allocated in terms of additional dwellings.
This makes a mockery of RDC's Policy statement of "Fair shares for all".

Support

Core Strategy Submission Document

Representation ID: 16084

Received: 28/10/2009

Respondent: Swan Housing Association

Representation Summary:

Swan supports the suggested list of sites in H2 but would also support a flexible approach to switching sites from the by 2015 column to 2015-2021 column and vice versa.

Full text:

Swan supports the suggested list of sites in H2 but would also support a flexible approach to switching sites from the by 2015 column to 2015-2021 column and vice versa.

Object

Core Strategy Submission Document

Representation ID: 16170

Received: 02/11/2009

Respondent: Stuart Tennison

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

New housing allocation proposed for Rawreth Lane area is far greater than that being proposed for other towns/villages in the Rochford district. It also does not take into account recent additional housing development in the area, and the lack of infrastructure to support this development.

Full text:

New housing allocation proposed for Rawreth Lane area is far greater than that being proposed for other towns/villages in the Rochford district. It also does not take into account recent additional housing development in the area, and the lack of infrastructure to support this development.