Policy ENV3 - New Public Open Space - South

Support

Representation ID: 4534

Received: 17/02/2009

Respondent: Mr Antony Rogers

Would suggest a high priority be placed on building a new link road, via the safeguarded route, as early as possible. This will limit the adverse impact of increased traffic flow running very close to the existing residential dwellings along Eastwoodbury Lane.

Object

Representation ID: 4782

Received: 01/03/2009

Respondent: Mr Stuart Grant

This appears to replace the current small holdings with public parkland. It is not clear what happens to the dwellings on the small holdings.

The current land use has a charm unique to the area, and it's loss would be detrimental to the appearance and variety of the area.

Object

Representation ID: 4846

Received: 03/03/2009

Respondent: Mr Ian Towler

In environmental terms this area is already green. Again the policies dress up a net loss (the new connecting road will pass through here) as a gain simply by doing a bit of landscaping.

Support

Representation ID: 4924

Received: 07/03/2009

Respondent: Miss Laura Van Assen

I support this

Support

Representation ID: 5030

Received: 09/03/2009

Respondent: Mr K Meikle

Good idea I fully support.

Object

Representation ID: 5040

Received: 09/03/2009

Respondent: Mr W Hill

Once again this land is currently an open space.Once again the proposals mislead the public in to thinking that they are being given a new open space when in reality the developments will reduce open space and see the current countryside surrounded by roads carrying traffic serving the airport and industrial activity.

Object

Representation ID: 5201

Received: 13/03/2009

Respondent: Mr B Jones

STRONGLY OBJECT TO ALL EXPANSION. Do minimum or preferably no expansion.The increase in aircraft noise for us residents will become intolerable, emissions will increase. The road system cannot cope with current traffic levels. If 2m passenger movements are reached this will require about 4000 extra car journeys per day!!! Imagine the road upgrading work for the next few years that would be required. This area has a high percentage of elderly people who hardly fly. Who will the expansion benefit, people flying from outside the region and the business people and major shareholders who will make millions of pounds.

Object

Representation ID: 5212

Received: 14/03/2009

Respondent: Mrs D Davies

As in ENV2, this proposal is being 'sold' to us as gaining open space. In reality it will be an oasis in a network of access roads carrying heavy vehicles to and from the airport.

Support

Representation ID: 5434

Received: 25/03/2009

Respondent: Mrs A Wate

this will be a good space for the people in the area and should again be laid out as quality parkland

Object

Representation ID: 5641

Received: 25/03/2009

Respondent: karen sutherland

within this area 'a route will be safeguarded for the construction of a new road'...hardly of much recreational use to the public then

Object

Representation ID: 5688

Received: 26/03/2009

Respondent: Allan Trower

I strongly object to the plans to extend southend airport. I do not believe the area needs another airport, particularly one that is in an urban area and will effect many people's lives in leigh on sea, both financially through the fall in house prices and environmentally. Plans to have night flights are totally unacceptable and will be detremental people's lives including children and will effect their education. I for one will be discussing this with my Local MP to stop this ridiculous proposal. A far better plan would have been to move the Hospital to the Airport site!!!

Object

Representation ID: 5735

Received: 26/03/2009

Respondent: Allan Trower

This will have a negative on:-

1. Environment (noise and pollution)
2. Wildlife and greenbelt
3. Surrounding residential properties
4. Public Services (Health and Education)
5. Infrastructure (congestion)

I dont believe the sweetner on job creation given the current climate so dont be fooled by this one. I can't see many companies wanting to invest in this proposal.

Object

Representation ID: 5779

Received: 26/03/2009

Respondent: Gemma Cudlipp

Open space - with a road going through it... Hmmm... not really open space then is it?
Airport Expansion - Don't do it!!!!!

Support

Representation ID: 5815

Received: 27/03/2009

Respondent: Mr T Clark

Again, this is a sensible measure bearing in mind the long identified need to improve access to the east of Southend.

Support

Representation ID: 5853

Received: 27/03/2009

Respondent: MR J GRANGER

I support the plans for new open space to compliment the airport expansion and industrial areas.

Object

Representation ID: 6023

Received: 29/03/2009

Respondent: Mr Derek Waddy-Smith

This isn't really open space.

Object

Representation ID: 6125

Received: 31/03/2009

Respondent: Mrs Joanna Spencer

do not need it

Object

Representation ID: 6325

Received: 02/04/2009

Respondent: mr kevin brodhurst

who wants to walk in an area where you wont be able to hear yourself think let alone be at one with nature.

Object

Representation ID: 6336

Received: 02/04/2009

Respondent: dave willats

THIS JUST SOUND LIKE LOCAL PEOPLE BEING BAUGHT OFF WITH A FIELD

Support

Representation ID: 6392

Received: 02/04/2009

Respondent: Mr Jeffrey Pacey

Agree.

Object

Representation ID: 6472

Received: 03/04/2009

Respondent: Mr Ian Bartley

This is not needed

Object

Representation ID: 6506

Received: 04/04/2009

Respondent: David Emery

So an expanded airport is good for the environment? We have few clean green an open spaces in the crowded SE. Can we please just except you cannot squeeze in more pollution (noise, carbon emmissions, concrete infrstructure) without significant impact on the quality of peoples lives.

Object

Representation ID: 6538

Received: 06/04/2009

Respondent: Mr Neil Taylor

This will provide a limited amenity to local residents once the open space has been bisected by a busy road.

Comment

Representation ID: 6554

Received: 04/04/2009

Respondent: Deb Pacey

I feel there is no point to making a place for families/children to play and relax and then to put a road through or near it.

Object

Representation ID: 6587

Received: 04/04/2009

Respondent: Mr Brian Birnie

I feel let down already that work of some kind is in progress in the Southend Road location. It appears that a decision has been made by Rochford and Southend Councils already.

I strongly object to the expansion of Southend Airport and the changes that are associated with it. This list is a few of the reasons.
Increased pollution. Increased traffic on roads already congested. Increased noise 24 hours no guarantee to limits. Reduction in house values as can already be seen just with the expansion proposals. Increase in freight flights these planes won't be quieter than newer style passenger planes.

Object

Representation ID: 6665

Received: 05/04/2009

Respondent: Mr Heath Aldridge

Traffic concerns / property prices devaluation

Object

Representation ID: 6666

Received: 05/04/2009

Respondent: Mr Heath Aldridge

Traffic concerns / property prices devaluation

Object

Representation ID: 6735

Received: 05/04/2009

Respondent: Charles Wetton

This is a token gesture to appease the local community for the damage and disruption that would follow this expansion.

Object

Representation ID: 6952

Received: 06/04/2009

Respondent: P Crawshaw

I strongly object to the runway extension and associated developments. They will blight the lives of many residents in the area due to the increase in noise, pollution and traffic to provide very limited benefits.

Object

Representation ID: 7164

Received: 07/04/2009

Respondent: Mr A James

These open spaces already exist.