Policy ADZ1 - Existing Terminal Area

Support

Representation ID: 4543

Received: 17/02/2009

Respondent: MR J GRANGER

Hotel development in this area would be a further boost to the airport operation whilst providing must needed extra hotel capacity within the Southend/Rochford area, along with further employment opportunities.

Support

Representation ID: 4621

Received: 20/02/2009

Respondent: Mr Trevor Webber

Hotel accomodation is essential when it comes to an airport as passengers can stay before and after a flight. In addition it will create additional employment to the town.

Object

Representation ID: 4952

Received: 08/03/2009

Respondent: Mrs. Avril Peebles

Please see my comments on Policy MR01.

Object

Representation ID: 4965

Received: 08/03/2009

Respondent: Mr E A Clarke

High growth (Scenario 3) was objected to by the majority of respondents to the first 'consultation' phase designed to select the preferred option in a supposedly democratic manner.The only support mentioned in the summary analysis of those responses (check the Rochford Council website) was medium growth (2a.)

Support

Representation ID: 5017

Received: 09/03/2009

Respondent: Mr K Meikle

I fully support especially the retail ban.

Object

Representation ID: 5068

Received: 10/03/2009

Respondent: Mr. Martin Round.

I am against any expansion at London Southend Airport.

Object

Representation ID: 5112

Received: 11/03/2009

Respondent: Mrs D Davies

One hotel will not support 2mppa. Further development of this kind will be required in the future. To accommodate further development land will be 'confiscated' from the surrounding area. Erosion of open space/green belt land must be avoided at all cost.

Object

Representation ID: 5188

Received: 13/03/2009

Respondent: Mr B Jones

STRONGLY OBJECT TO ALL EXPANSION. Do minimum or preferably no expansion.The increase in aircraft noise for us residents will become intolerable, emissions will increase. The road system cannot cope with current traffic levels. If 2m passenger movements are reached this will require about 4000 extra car journeys per day!!! Imagine the road upgrading work for the next few years that would be required. This area has a high percentage of elderly people who hardly fly. Who will the expansion benefit, people flying from outside the region and the business people and major shareholders who will make millions of pounds.

Support

Representation ID: 5208

Received: 13/03/2009

Respondent: Mr Mark Allington

A modern, purpose built terminal with hotel and other facilities is just what's needed to underpin this expansion. It will be the perfect place to travel from, locally !

Object

Representation ID: 5246

Received: 17/03/2009

Respondent: Mr. John Spinks

I suggest that Southend Airport should be closed down completely and then the question of what to do or not to do with the existing terminal area would not arise.

Support

Representation ID: 5328

Received: 19/03/2009

Respondent: Miss M Andrews

I agree in principle with the Jaap preferred options, and believe that this would ensure that this corner of Essex is not left out in the cold in the future, and provides development opportunities.
Like most people I may have some concerns about the supporting infrastructure and would ask that we make the best of our opportunities to inprove our roads and make it work for us.
I believe that residents living under the flight path have concerns about aircraft noise and the frequency of flights

Object

Representation ID: 5340

Received: 19/03/2009

Respondent: Mr terence white

2 Million passengers a year is an unrealistic figure as this would require a minimum of 8 flights per hour minimum, a totally unacceptable figure.

Object

Representation ID: 5384

Received: 20/03/2009

Respondent: Amanda Barness

No expansion please.

Support

Representation ID: 5422

Received: 25/03/2009

Respondent: Mrs A Wate

agree as above

Object

Representation ID: 5555

Received: 24/03/2009

Respondent: karen sutherland

I strongly object to all airport expansion

Object

Representation ID: 5675

Received: 26/03/2009

Respondent: Allan Trower

I strongly object to the plans to extend southend airport. I do not believe the area needs another airport, particularly one that is in an urban area and will effect many people's lives in leigh on sea, both financially through the fall in house prices and environmentally. Plans to have night flights are totally unacceptable and will be detremental people's lives including children and will effect their education. I for one will be discussing this with my Local MP to stop this ridiculous proposal. A far better plan would have been to move the Hospital to the Airport site!!!

Object

Representation ID: 5723

Received: 26/03/2009

Respondent: Allan Trower

This will have a negative on:-

1. Environment (noise and pollution)
2. Wildlife and greenbelt
3. Surrounding residential properties
4. Public Services (Health and Education)
5. Infrastructure (congestion)

I dont believe the sweetner on job creation given the current climate so dont be fooled by this one. I can't see many companies wanting to invest in this proposal.

Object

Representation ID: 5775

Received: 26/03/2009

Respondent: Gemma Cudlipp

Why not support retail? A few more shops would certainly create jobs and be far more appealing to local residents than monstrous freight planes droning overhead day and night. I don't believe the people behind this proposal, and those supporting it, have anything but their own fiscal interests at heart and they should feel deeply ashamed of themselves at blighting this green and pleasant land.

Support

Representation ID: 5804

Received: 27/03/2009

Respondent: Mr T Clark

Agree as a general rule that no new retail sites should be built in this area. However provision should be allowed for some limited small retail outlets that may again be needed within the existing terminal curtilage.

Comment

Representation ID: 5883

Received: 28/03/2009

Respondent: MR JEREMY DAVENPORT

a HOTEL will be the only thing in the whole plaqn which will give local jobs and bring money into the town -both in very small quantities,.

Object

Representation ID: 5929

Received: 29/03/2009

Respondent: Mr Adam Compton-Edwards

Where are the funds for this coming from in this time of recession? I object to all proposals that support expansion of the airport.

Object

Representation ID: 5947

Received: 29/03/2009

Respondent: Mrs Fleur Derbyshire-Fox

The conditions of applications are all geared towards expansion of the airport. No airport expansion please; the negative impacts of expansion include:

1. Environment (noise and pollution)
2. Wildlife and greenbelt
3. Surrounding residential properties
4. Public Services (Health and Education)
5. Infrastructure (congestion)

Support

Representation ID: 6001

Received: 29/03/2009

Respondent: Mr S Crumley

Hotel development will certainly help with employment and will make the airport more viable to the European carriers.

Object

Representation ID: 6011

Received: 29/03/2009

Respondent: Mr Derek Waddy-Smith

The negative certainties for the area far outweigh any potential - unsupported - benefits to the local community.

Object

Representation ID: 6112

Received: 31/03/2009

Respondent: Mrs Joanna Spencer

I understand that the airport hotel has already been granted. I feel sorry for those people that live opposite, were they asked? How will the surrounding roads take the increase of traffic?

Object

Representation ID: 6176

Received: 31/03/2009

Respondent: Mr Jon Spencer

more details needed

Support

Representation ID: 6311

Received: 02/04/2009

Respondent: Mr R Lupton

Fully support all proposals!

Support

Representation ID: 6380

Received: 02/04/2009

Respondent: Mr Jeffrey Pacey

Agree. Use of this area will be needed to support the expansion of airport.

Object

Representation ID: 6458

Received: 03/04/2009

Respondent: Mr Ian Bartley

No justification for expansion in current climate

Object

Representation ID: 6459

Received: 03/04/2009

Respondent: Mr Ian Bartley

Expansion unrealistic