Policy MRO1 - Northern MRO
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 4727
Received: 26/02/2009
Respondent: Mr Keith Thomas
increased hangerage and maintenance facilities will result in more noise and pollution and attract even more maintenance aircraft
increased hangerage and maintenance facilities will result in more noise and pollution and attract even more maintenance aircraft
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 4763
Received: 27/02/2009
Respondent: Mr Chris Russell
Much of the current excessive Airport noise comes from the testing of engines, often from older freight Aircraft which do not meet the new low noise passenger aircraft requirements. Any expansion of this activity should be strongly opposed.
This is often late at night even now.
Much of the current excessive Airport noise comes from the testing of engines, often from older freight Aircraft which do not meet the new low noise passenger aircraft requirements. Any expansion of this activity should be strongly opposed.
This is often late at night even now.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 4777
Received: 01/03/2009
Respondent: Mr Stuart Grant
Development of MRO facilities is proposed to the north west of the runway. This is currently open land.
The plan overall involves a loss of open space. Recreational facilities will replace existing agricultural land, and existing recreational facilities will be lost to development such as the MRO.
The loss of open green belt land is detrimental to the appearance of the area.
I submit that there should be no loss of open space.
Development of MRO facilities is proposed to the north west of the runway. This is currently open land.
The plan overall involves a loss of open space. Recreational facilities will replace existing agricultural land, and existing recreational facilities will be lost to development such as the MRO.
The loss of open green belt land is detrimental to the appearance of the area.
I submit that there should be no loss of open space.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 4873
Received: 05/03/2009
Respondent: Environment Agency
Policy MRO1
Parts of this area fall within Flood Zones 2 & 3. We would make representations stating that the plan is unsound if evidence of the sequential test of PPS25 has not been provided to support the allocation of land within the Northern MRO area.
If this evidence can be provided that the sequential test has been applied, then the policy should be improved to include the need for all applications to include flood risk mitigation measures to be incorporated into the design.
Policy MRO1
Parts of this area fall within Flood Zones 2 & 3. We would make representations stating that the plan is unsound if evidence of the sequential test of PPS25 has not been provided to support the allocation of land within the Northern MRO area.
If this evidence can be provided that the sequential test has been applied, then the policy should be improved to include the need for all applications to include flood risk mitigation measures to be incorporated into the design.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 4903
Received: 06/03/2009
Respondent: Mrs Tracey Chapman
Businesses that overhaul engines choose to test them in the evenings and on Sundays, probably to ensure that the authorities are not around to prevent them exceeding noise levels. More businesses providing this service will mean even more noise. Secondly the aircraft they are repairing are not safe and are often only licensed for one flight.
Businesses that overhaul engines choose to test them in the evenings and on Sundays, probably to ensure that the authorities are not around to prevent them exceeding noise levels. More businesses providing this service will mean even more noise. Secondly the aircraft they are repairing are not safe and are often only licensed for one flight.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 4920
Received: 07/03/2009
Respondent: Miss Laura Van Assen
This would provide more skilled employment to the area. I fully support this.
This would provide more skilled employment to the area. I fully support this.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 4949
Received: 08/03/2009
Respondent: Mrs. Avril Peebles
My objection to these policies are that I have no faith in the maintenance carried out at Southend airport, after the recent near disaster over East Anglia of an Easy jet aircraft having just had it's maintenance carried out.
My objection to these policies are that I have no faith in the maintenance carried out at Southend airport, after the recent near disaster over East Anglia of an Easy jet aircraft having just had it's maintenance carried out.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5014
Received: 09/03/2009
Respondent: Mr K Meikle
I fully support!
I fully support!
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5109
Received: 11/03/2009
Respondent: Mrs D Davies
We already endure 'test' flights after maintenance of ALL types of aircraft circling over our house. Noise levels can be intolerable and detrimental to wellbeing. Erosion of open space must be avoided at all cost. 'Required to make a financial contribution' is a phrase much used but meaningless. Who, with a view to enhancing their good health, will want to walk or cycle where noise & air pollution abounds. Is this a 'condition' laid down by government/dept of environment to ease the granting of this application?
We already endure 'test' flights after maintenance of ALL types of aircraft circling over our house. Noise levels can be intolerable and detrimental to wellbeing. Erosion of open space must be avoided at all cost. 'Required to make a financial contribution' is a phrase much used but meaningless. Who, with a view to enhancing their good health, will want to walk or cycle where noise & air pollution abounds. Is this a 'condition' laid down by government/dept of environment to ease the granting of this application?
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5139
Received: 12/03/2009
Respondent: Mrs S Clark
The current sound pollution of the aircraft being maintained at Southend Airport is already a considerable nuisance as these planes circle around and around. We certainly do not want an increase in volume.
The current sound pollution of the aircraft being maintained at Southend Airport is already a considerable nuisance as these planes circle around and around. We certainly do not want an increase in volume.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5185
Received: 13/03/2009
Respondent: Mr B Jones
STRONGLY OBJECT TO ALL EXPANSION. Do minimum or preferably no expansion.The increase in aircraft noise for us residents will become intolerable, emissions will increase. The road system cannot cope with current traffic levels. If 2m passenger movements are reached this will require about 4000 extra car journeys per day!!! Imagine the road upgrading work for the next few years that would be required. This area has a high percentage of elderly people who hardly fly. Who will the expansion benefit, people flying from outside the region and the business people and major shareholders who will make millions of pounds.
STRONGLY OBJECT TO ALL EXPANSION. Do minimum or preferably no expansion.The increase in aircraft noise for us residents will become intolerable, emissions will increase. The road system cannot cope with current traffic levels. If 2m passenger movements are reached this will require about 4000 extra car journeys per day!!! Imagine the road upgrading work for the next few years that would be required. This area has a high percentage of elderly people who hardly fly. Who will the expansion benefit, people flying from outside the region and the business people and major shareholders who will make millions of pounds.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5338
Received: 19/03/2009
Respondent: Mr terence white
Room and potential is limited.
Room and potential is limited.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5381
Received: 20/03/2009
Respondent: Amanda Barness
No expansion please.
No expansion please.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5420
Received: 25/03/2009
Respondent: Mrs A Wate
agree
agree
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5467
Received: 24/03/2009
Respondent: Mrs Susan Currington
The noise from engine testing already reaches intolerable levels sometimes. No increase please
The noise from engine testing already reaches intolerable levels sometimes. No increase please
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5547
Received: 24/03/2009
Respondent: Mr Mark Davis
The fumes from planes already at times are awful especially during the warmer months. When windows/doors are open an spending time in garden can be most unpleasant. What effect will the increased fumes have on our health.
The fumes from planes already at times are awful especially during the warmer months. When windows/doors are open an spending time in garden can be most unpleasant. What effect will the increased fumes have on our health.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5549
Received: 24/03/2009
Respondent: karen sutherland
the airport owners should have to fund all upgrades, and again just who is going to want to walk and cycle in the area...this is just 'box ticking'
the airport owners should have to fund all upgrades, and again just who is going to want to walk and cycle in the area...this is just 'box ticking'
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5568
Received: 15/05/2009
Respondent: London Southend Airport
This policy should have more flexibility in the wording of the use, to enable airport related developments, such as the relocated control tower, the fuel farm and other ancillary uses, which might not be purely MRO to take place. In addition, this policy should include a reference to aviation training facilities.
This policy should have more flexibility in the wording of the use, to enable airport related developments, such as the relocated control tower, the fuel farm and other ancillary uses, which might not be purely MRO to take place. In addition, this policy should include a reference to aviation training facilities.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5672
Received: 26/03/2009
Respondent: Allan Trower
I strongly object to the plans to extend southend airport. I do not believe the area needs another airport, particularly one that is in an urban area and will effect many people's lives in leigh on sea, both financially through the fall in house prices and environmentally. Plans to have night flights are totally unacceptable and will be detremental people's lives including children and will effect their education. I for one will be discussing this with my Local MP to stop this ridiculous proposal. A far better plan would have been to move the Hospital to the Airport site!!!
I strongly object to the plans to extend southend airport. I do not believe the area needs another airport, particularly one that is in an urban area and will effect many people's lives in leigh on sea, both financially through the fall in house prices and environmentally. Plans to have night flights are totally unacceptable and will be detremental people's lives including children and will effect their education. I for one will be discussing this with my Local MP to stop this ridiculous proposal. A far better plan would have been to move the Hospital to the Airport site!!!
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5704
Received: 26/03/2009
Respondent: Mrs. Laura O'Connor
They cheerfully add that they will be improving facilities for "walkers and cyclists" as if they have some regard for "green issues". Yeah, Right!
They cheerfully add that they will be improving facilities for "walkers and cyclists" as if they have some regard for "green issues". Yeah, Right!
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5720
Received: 26/03/2009
Respondent: Allan Trower
This will have a negative on:-
1. Environment (noise and pollution)
2. Wildlife and greenbelt
3. Surrounding residential properties
4. Public Services (Health and Education)
5. Infrastructure (congestion)
I dont believe the sweetner on job creation given the current climate so dont be fooled by this one. I can't see many companies wanting to invest in this proposal.
This will have a negative on:-
1. Environment (noise and pollution)
2. Wildlife and greenbelt
3. Surrounding residential properties
4. Public Services (Health and Education)
5. Infrastructure (congestion)
I dont believe the sweetner on job creation given the current climate so dont be fooled by this one. I can't see many companies wanting to invest in this proposal.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5802
Received: 27/03/2009
Respondent: Mr T Clark
New hangarage should be encouraged provided it fits with the safeguarding and operability criteria for the airport.
New hangarage should be encouraged provided it fits with the safeguarding and operability criteria for the airport.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5930
Received: 29/03/2009
Respondent: Mr Adam Compton-Edwards
I object to this due to environmental and quality of life reasons.
I object to this due to environmental and quality of life reasons.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5964
Received: 29/03/2009
Respondent: Paul Howell
more noise more pollution.
more noise more pollution.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5997
Received: 29/03/2009
Respondent: Mr S Crumley
Fully support.
Fully support.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6008
Received: 29/03/2009
Respondent: Mr Derek Waddy-Smith
Loss of green belt.
Loss of green belt.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6111
Received: 31/03/2009
Respondent: Mrs Joanna Spencer
You can already smell the fumes from running engines. I have children what happened to trying to make the air clean
You can already smell the fumes from running engines. I have children what happened to trying to make the air clean
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6175
Received: 31/03/2009
Respondent: Mr Jon Spencer
this will mean more testing of planes, more noise, more pollution.
this will mean more testing of planes, more noise, more pollution.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6309
Received: 02/04/2009
Respondent: Mr R Lupton
Fully support all proposals!
Fully support all proposals!
Comment
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6335
Received: 02/04/2009
Respondent: dave willats
GOD HELP THE SMALL BUSINESSMAN WHO HAS TO PUT HIS HAND IN HIS POCKET FOR THIS 1
GOD HELP THE SMALL BUSINESSMAN WHO HAS TO PUT HIS HAND IN HIS POCKET FOR THIS 1