Policy E6 - Development of Area 1B - Saxon Business Park
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5004
Received: 09/03/2009
Respondent: Mr K Meikle
Fully Support.
Fully Support.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5005
Received: 09/03/2009
Respondent: Mr K Meikle
Fully Support.
Fully Support.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5174
Received: 13/03/2009
Respondent: Mr B Jones
STRONGLY OBJECT TO ALL EXPANSION. Do minimum or preferably no expansion.The increase in aircraft noise for us residents will become intolerable, emissions will increase. The road system cannot cope with current traffic levels. If 2m passenger movements are reached this will require about 4000 extra car journeys per day!!! Imagine the road upgrading work for the next few years that would be required. This area has a high percentage of elderly people who hardly fly. Who will the expansion benefit, people flying from outside the region and the business people and major shareholders who will make millions of pounds.
STRONGLY OBJECT TO ALL EXPANSION. Do minimum or preferably no expansion.The increase in aircraft noise for us residents will become intolerable, emissions will increase. The road system cannot cope with current traffic levels. If 2m passenger movements are reached this will require about 4000 extra car journeys per day!!! Imagine the road upgrading work for the next few years that would be required. This area has a high percentage of elderly people who hardly fly. Who will the expansion benefit, people flying from outside the region and the business people and major shareholders who will make millions of pounds.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5409
Received: 25/03/2009
Respondent: Mrs A Wate
agree a business with no raod is no good
agree a business with no raod is no good
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5516
Received: 24/03/2009
Respondent: karen sutherland
a new access road across green belt land leading to yet more vacant units
a new access road across green belt land leading to yet more vacant units
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5602
Received: 25/03/2009
Respondent: Mr Graham Whitehead
All this talk of the proposed business parks, units etc. Extending the runway is not a precursor. All that is needed is a clear need for these business premises. If they do not stand up on their own, why are they being lumped into the Extension of the runway?. If they are /were needed, then just do it, there are already enough empty units in the area to suggest they are not. Do not con the populace into thinking the runway extension will provide these opportunities & jobs.
All this talk of the proposed business parks, units etc. Extending the runway is not a precursor. All that is needed is a clear need for these business premises. If they do not stand up on their own, why are they being lumped into the Extension of the runway?. If they are /were needed, then just do it, there are already enough empty units in the area to suggest they are not. Do not con the populace into thinking the runway extension will provide these opportunities & jobs.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5603
Received: 25/03/2009
Respondent: Mr Graham Whitehead
All this talk of the proposed business parks, units etc. Extending the runway is not a precursor. All that is needed is a clear need for these business premises. If they do not stand up on their own, why are they being lumped into the Extension of the runway?. If they are /were needed, then just do it, there are already enough empty units in the area to suggest they are not. Do not con the populace into thinking the runway extension will provide these opportunities & jobs.
All this talk of the proposed business parks, units etc. Extending the runway is not a precursor. All that is needed is a clear need for these business premises. If they do not stand up on their own, why are they being lumped into the Extension of the runway?. If they are /were needed, then just do it, there are already enough empty units in the area to suggest they are not. Do not con the populace into thinking the runway extension will provide these opportunities & jobs.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5710
Received: 26/03/2009
Respondent: Allan Trower
This will have a negative on:-
1. Environment (noise and pollution)
2. Wildlife and greenbelt
3. Surrounding residential properties
4. Public Services (Health and Education)
5. Infrastructure (congestion)
I dont believe the sweetner on job creation given the current climate so dont be fooled by this one. I can't see many companies wanting to invest in this proposal.
This will have a negative on:-
1. Environment (noise and pollution)
2. Wildlife and greenbelt
3. Surrounding residential properties
4. Public Services (Health and Education)
5. Infrastructure (congestion)
I dont believe the sweetner on job creation given the current climate so dont be fooled by this one. I can't see many companies wanting to invest in this proposal.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 5824
Received: 27/03/2009
Respondent: Mr T Clark
An extension to this road should be safeguarded for possible use to facilitate MRO developments on the airport, perhaps by linking to an extension to Aviation Way, thus providing a circular route back to Cherry Orchard Way.
An extension to this road should be safeguarded for possible use to facilitate MRO developments on the airport, perhaps by linking to an extension to Aviation Way, thus providing a circular route back to Cherry Orchard Way.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6048
Received: 30/03/2009
Respondent: Mr Rick Jackson
As someone who works in Southend and lives in Rochford, the economic and employment benefits of the airport development far outweigh any of the objections put forward.
As someone who works in Southend and lives in Rochford, the economic and employment benefits of the airport development far outweigh any of the objections put forward.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6101
Received: 31/03/2009
Respondent: Mrs Joanna Spencer
Object why do we need this
Object why do we need this
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6162
Received: 31/03/2009
Respondent: Mr Jon Spencer
object
object
Comment
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6314
Received: 02/04/2009
Respondent: dave willats
this road should of been in place when cherry orchard way was put in anyway
this road should of been in place when cherry orchard way was put in anyway
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6482
Received: 04/04/2009
Respondent: David Emery
No expansion of any airport in the last 25 years has resulted in the expected increase in job opportunities. Any figures quoted are inevitably inflated to make the whole expansion in some way palatable! I object to every single proposal. In addition the process of objection is over complicated, confusing, time-consuming and strongly suggests it has been designed to statistically weaken any single objection! Rochford council should be ashamed of themselves!
No expansion of any airport in the last 25 years has resulted in the expected increase in job opportunities. Any figures quoted are inevitably inflated to make the whole expansion in some way palatable! I object to every single proposal. In addition the process of objection is over complicated, confusing, time-consuming and strongly suggests it has been designed to statistically weaken any single objection! Rochford council should be ashamed of themselves!
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6561
Received: 04/04/2009
Respondent: Mr Brian Birnie
I feel let down already that work of some kind is in progress in the Southend Road location. It appears that a decision has been made by Rochford and Southend Councils already.
I strongly object to the expansion of Southend Airport and the changes that are associated with it. This list is a few of the reasons.
Increased pollution. Increased traffic on roads already congested. Increased noise 24 hours no guarantee to limits. Reduction in house values as can already be seen just with the expansion proposals. Increase in freight flights these planes won't be quieter than newer style passenger planes.
I feel let down already that work of some kind is in progress in the Southend Road location. It appears that a decision has been made by Rochford and Southend Councils already.
I strongly object to the expansion of Southend Airport and the changes that are associated with it. This list is a few of the reasons.
Increased pollution. Increased traffic on roads already congested. Increased noise 24 hours no guarantee to limits. Reduction in house values as can already be seen just with the expansion proposals. Increase in freight flights these planes won't be quieter than newer style passenger planes.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6639
Received: 05/04/2009
Respondent: Mr Heath Aldridge
Traffic concerns / property prices devaluation
Traffic concerns / property prices devaluation
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6749
Received: 05/04/2009
Respondent: Mr David Thomas
I strongly object to the proposed Business Parks near Southend Airport being in linked with the proposed Airport Runway Extension.
There is no dependency between them suggested in either the new or old JAAP reports or anything else I have seen. According to the JAAP Report of the 7380 total jobs expected to be created 6200 jobs are due to the Business Parks, leaving only 1180 due to the Airport expansion. How many of these 1180 would be created without the runway extension is not given. These two proposals should be considered and voted on independently.
I strongly object to the proposed Business Parks near Southend Airport being in linked with the proposed Airport Runway Extension.
There is no dependency between them suggested in either the new or old JAAP reports or anything else I have seen. According to the JAAP Report of the 7380 total jobs expected to be created 6200 jobs are due to the Business Parks, leaving only 1180 due to the Airport expansion. How many of these 1180 would be created without the runway extension is not given. These two proposals should be considered and voted on independently.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 6921
Received: 06/04/2009
Respondent: P Crawshaw
I strongly object to the runway extension and associated developments. They will blight the lives of many residents in the area due to the increase in noise, pollution and traffic to provide very limited benefits.
I strongly object to the runway extension and associated developments. They will blight the lives of many residents in the area due to the increase in noise, pollution and traffic to provide very limited benefits.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 7135
Received: 07/04/2009
Respondent: Mr A James
I am concerned about the considerable and unnecessary expansion of the industrial estate and the loss of greenbelt and good farmland.
I am concerned about the considerable and unnecessary expansion of the industrial estate and the loss of greenbelt and good farmland.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 7307
Received: 07/04/2009
Respondent: Kylie Heath
The proposed airport extension would have an adverse effect on the local town. The area is simply too built up with local housing to support the extension. It is too late to try to extend the airport without ruining the quality of life of thousands of people.
The proposed airport extension would have an adverse effect on the local town. The area is simply too built up with local housing to support the extension. It is too late to try to extend the airport without ruining the quality of life of thousands of people.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 7357
Received: 07/04/2009
Respondent: Mr Jeremy Huband
As a child I collected newts around this area
As a child I collected newts around this area
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 7581
Received: 08/04/2009
Respondent: Mr Paul Gillard
I object to the proposed development because the sustainable transport measures take no account of the A127 which is unable to cope with any more traffic, be it from passengers (a smaller percentage of which will use the railway) or the expected extra employees at the new industrial areas.
I object to the proposed development because the sustainable transport measures take no account of the A127 which is unable to cope with any more traffic, be it from passengers (a smaller percentage of which will use the railway) or the expected extra employees at the new industrial areas.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 7715
Received: 09/04/2009
Respondent: Mr Michael Powell
Do we really need these business parks given so many business premises are empty in the area?
Do we really need these business parks given so many business premises are empty in the area?
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 7872
Received: 09/04/2009
Respondent: Mrs Ellen Maria O'Hara
Southend is an area which is already heavily built up. Where do the emergency landings take place? The air and noise pollution will be a total nightmare for existing residents. Where will all the traffic go? In 1966 the government refused the proposed expansion of runway 15/33 on environmental grounds - surely this argument is even stronger today - we are ALL aware of the environment problems surrounding this!
Southend is an area which is already heavily built up. Where do the emergency landings take place? The air and noise pollution will be a total nightmare for existing residents. Where will all the traffic go? In 1966 the government refused the proposed expansion of runway 15/33 on environmental grounds - surely this argument is even stronger today - we are ALL aware of the environment problems surrounding this!
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 7980
Received: 11/04/2009
Respondent: Mrs Shirley Emery
I object due to infrastructure already fully stretched/environment and the fact that there are already so many empty business facilities in and around Southend. Why loose more green areas? Regenerate what we have would be sensible for all our futures.
I object due to infrastructure already fully stretched/environment and the fact that there are already so many empty business facilities in and around Southend. Why loose more green areas? Regenerate what we have would be sensible for all our futures.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 8036
Received: 12/04/2009
Respondent: Mr David Jacobs
this will alowe better use of the airport and increased european flights, and therfor a increas in trade for the area
this will alowe better use of the airport and increased european flights, and therfor a increas in trade for the area
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 8106
Received: 14/04/2009
Respondent: mr peter allwright
no
no
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 8300
Received: 17/04/2009
Respondent: MRS CAROL BENTLEY-SIMPSON
As long as jobs are offered to people already in the area it will be good to bring the jobs in.
As long as jobs are offered to people already in the area it will be good to bring the jobs in.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 8373
Received: 18/04/2009
Respondent: Katherine Emery
So an expanded airport is good for the environment? We have few clean green an open spaces in the crowded SE. Can we please just except you cannot squeeze in more pollution (noise, carbon emissions, concrete infrastructure) without significant impact on the quality of peoples lives.
So an expanded airport is good for the environment? We have few clean green an open spaces in the crowded SE. Can we please just except you cannot squeeze in more pollution (noise, carbon emissions, concrete infrastructure) without significant impact on the quality of peoples lives.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 8475
Received: 18/04/2009
Respondent: mr Peter Chandler
agree
agree