Policy E5 - Development of Area 1A - Saxon Business Park

Object

Representation ID: 7979

Received: 11/04/2009

Respondent: Mrs Shirley Emery

I object due to infrastructure already fully stretched/environment and the fact that there are already so many empty business facilities in and around Southend.

Object

Representation ID: 8105

Received: 14/04/2009

Respondent: mr peter allwright

no

Support

Representation ID: 8299

Received: 17/04/2009

Respondent: MRS CAROL BENTLEY-SIMPSON

I think anything that will bring jobs in is good! It is better than housing because the essential services couldnt cope and the schools, transport system couldnt ether. so a business park will bring jobs for people already living here. It must be offered to locals though

Support

Representation ID: 8474

Received: 18/04/2009

Respondent: mr Peter Chandler

agree

Object

Representation ID: 8515

Received: 19/04/2009

Respondent: Rory Emery

Strongly Object on the gorunds of:
(1) Living directly under the flightpath my quality life will be severely impacted
(2) Thought the government / councils were meant to improve the environment and not poison it
(3) Road connections to Southend are already over congested
(4) All promises of increased employment opportunities in other regional airport development have never been met.
(5) The SE already has 4 international airports for passenger travel.
(6) Investing in air travel can only be short term given oil becoming scarce / expensive in the next 10 years.

Object

Representation ID: 8638

Received: 20/04/2009

Respondent: Mrs susie Ash

I strongly object to ALL the proposals for the Airport expansion & redevelopment of the surrounding areas. The infrastructure will NOT support the planned numbers of passengers, and expansion of roads will only add to an already crowded environment. What will Cuckoo Corner and the A127 be like then????
Traffic in this whole area is already at total gridlock, and the airport expansion will certainly make this worse.

The increased noise & environmental pollution will affect thousands of local people.

I don't care how many new jobs they say will be created, they are not needed for this type of BAD PLANNING...

Object

Representation ID: 9090

Received: 26/04/2009

Respondent: mr David Holmes

What really worries me is that the council have agreed to most of this in advance, which is why Stobart Group have invested so heavily.

How many councillors live under the flight-path or in the areas affected potentially by more HGV traffic?

The jobs for the airport are likely to be skilled and very few will go locally, meaning more traffic in and out of the area.

The council believes that a business park will create over 6000 jobs. It took 2 years to find anyone for Cherry Orchard and that was before the recession.

An ill-conceived plan

Object

Representation ID: 9174

Received: 27/04/2009

Respondent: Chris Poole

I strongly object to the whole concept of this Saxon Business park since there are many empty 'brown field sites within Southend, which should be considered first.

This proposed development should not be linked to the airport expansion.

Object

Representation ID: 9343

Received: 28/04/2009

Respondent: Mrs Siobhan Thomas

Too many business parks already

Object

Representation ID: 9552

Received: 30/04/2009

Respondent: S Ewing

the area cannot cope with additonal traffic and pollution irrespective of new local roads built the trunk system cannot cope as is let alone adding to it

Object

Representation ID: 9590

Received: 01/05/2009

Respondent: mrs linda matthews

i do not want increased air traffic over my house, and i dont think the infrastructure around the airport could cope with the increase in use.

Object

Representation ID: 9628

Received: 01/05/2009

Respondent: Mrs Loraine Thompson

I love taking my grandchildren and dogs for walks around this area, but sadly if you have your way we will be walking on concrete. At this rate there will be nowhere for dogs and children to run free.

Object

Representation ID: 9816

Received: 04/05/2009

Respondent: mr Paul Fox

With global warming we do not want a larger airport or more aeroplanes.

Object

Representation ID: 9875

Received: 07/05/2009

Respondent: mrs lilian fleming

another pie in the sky!

Object

Representation ID: 10105

Received: 06/05/2009

Respondent: mrs sarah brill

I believe your fundementally wrong projection for activity for these area is wrong

Support

Representation ID: 10187

Received: 08/05/2009

Respondent: Mr. Terence DAVIES

E5.

I fully support the development of Area 1A - Saxon Business Park as detailed in Policy E5.

Object

Representation ID: 10276

Received: 07/05/2009

Respondent: MRS SUSAN THORN

OBJECT

Object

Representation ID: 10315

Received: 07/05/2009

Respondent: MR STEVEN THORN

object

Object

Representation ID: 10355

Received: 07/05/2009

Respondent: mr kevin Mahony

I object to expansion of Southend aiport.

Support

Representation ID: 10565

Received: 11/05/2009

Respondent: Renaissance Southend

The Saxon Business Park should be the subject of a detailed Development Brief to deal with the provision of infrastructure and utilities prior to any detailed planning application.

Object

Representation ID: 10646

Received: 08/05/2009

Respondent: Peter Mack

I object on the grounds of loss of green belt and an increase road traffic.

Object

Representation ID: 10664

Received: 08/05/2009

Respondent: Mrs Susan Mack

I object to the proposed development of Southend Airport on the grounds of
increased noise, road traffic, night flights, loss of green belt, pollution
and the loss of amenity of thousands of residents in the surrounding area
to enjoy their homes and gardens.

Object

Representation ID: 10718

Received: 08/05/2009

Respondent: Mr GEORGE COX

I do not agree the over 7,000 jobs will be created by the expansion plans. In fact, when the job survey was carried, the country was not in a financial mess and therefore I would dispute the accuracy of those figures. I doubt more than a handful of jobs would be created. The survey must be carried out again in light of the country's financial situation.

Object

Representation ID: 10739

Received: 08/05/2009

Respondent: Mrs Louisa Reynolds

Do we really need another business park? In the current climate with so many firms going under, who is going to occupy it?

Object

Representation ID: 10781

Received: 08/05/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Reynolds

I object to this plan.

Object

Representation ID: 10844

Received: 09/05/2009

Respondent: clive Davison

I object to expanding developing this area.

Southend is over crowded as it is - traffic appalling, too many flats being built, Town Centre is a no-go area in the evening.

Houses will be de-valued as has been seen around Stansted and the noise from the airport at night is already unacceptable.

Object

Representation ID: 10946

Received: 10/05/2009

Respondent: Lynn Pooley

Please see previous objetions.

Object

Representation ID: 10989

Received: 10/05/2009

Respondent: Mrs Shelley Chamberlain

The airport extension plan wrong. It is not needed in this corner of Essex. Therefore, the development of the business park is not necessary.

Object

Representation ID: 11041

Received: 10/05/2009

Respondent: Adam Mack

I object on the following basis:
Noise pollution
Air traffic
Air pollution
Quality of life to local residents
Loss of Green Belt land
CO2 emissions/Global Warming

Object

Representation ID: 11086

Received: 10/05/2009

Respondent: Natalie Carter

I object on the following basis:
Noise pollution
Air traffic
Air pollution
Quality of life to local residents
Loss of Green Belt land
CO2 emissions/Global Warming