Questions 5.1 - 5.3
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1755
Received: 04/08/2008
Respondent: Mr and Mrs A F Woodward
Agent: Mr and Mrs A F Woodward
I lived in the area for over thirty years and have often used the airport both for business and pleasure but over the last ten to fifteen years there has been a decline in the passenger choice of destinations,but an increase in noise levels? ,if the proposed expansion was to be at the same level as London City Airport whichhas successfully used low noise STOL type aircraft not old units, no further intrusion into what is a residential should be nessesary.
I lived in the area for over thirty years and have often used the airport both for business and pleasure but over the last ten to fifteen years there has been a decline in the passenger choice of destinations,but an increase in noise levels? ,if the proposed expansion was to be at the same level as London City Airport whichhas successfully used low noise STOL type aircraft not old units, no further intrusion into what is a residential should be nessesary.
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 2211
Received: 08/08/2008
Respondent: gillian moore
I object to the fact that there is no opportunity to opt for NO expansion of the airport
We are not obliged to cater for the predicted demand for air travel. The sector makes a disproportionate contribution to climate change and should be included in targets for cutting emissions There should not be an assumption that there is a requirement to develop the airport at all Options 1, 11 and 111 will undoubtedly act as drivers for increased CO2 emissions at a time when national, regional and local government should be acting to prevent damaging climate change.
I object to the fact that there is no opportunity to opt for NO expansion of the airport
We are not obliged to cater for the predicted demand for air travel. The sector makes a disproportionate contribution to climate change and should be included in targets for cutting emissions There should not be an assumption that there is a requirement to develop the airport at all Options 1, 11 and 111 will undoubtedly act as drivers for increased CO2 emissions at a time when national, regional and local government should be acting to prevent damaging climate change.