5.4.2 Scenario Assessment
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1267
Received: 21/07/2008
Respondent: Mrs Susan Currington
Residents will not have a high quality environment due to increased traffic and increased noise
Residents will not have a high quality environment due to increased traffic and increased noise
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1327
Received: 22/07/2008
Respondent: Mr Kelvin White
strongly object
strongly object
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1375
Received: 24/07/2008
Respondent: F Schwartzbard
there is very little detail of how much noise will be created.
there is very little detail of how much noise will be created.
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1377
Received: 24/07/2008
Respondent: F Schwartzbard
I would object to the increase in aircraft noise and I also belive the figure of 40 passenger flights a day to be grossly underestimated if you are talking about 2 million passengers a year.
I would object to the increase in aircraft noise and I also belive the figure of 40 passenger flights a day to be grossly underestimated if you are talking about 2 million passengers a year.
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1378
Received: 24/07/2008
Respondent: F Schwartzbard
The increase in aircraft and traffic noise would not improve the environment.
The increase in aircraft and traffic noise would not improve the environment.
Comment
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1463
Received: 26/07/2008
Respondent: Mr T Clark
Option 3 is better for the good of the area, failing that Option 2b.
Option 3 is better for the good of the area, failing that Option 2b.
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1687
Received: 31/07/2008
Respondent: Mr Derek Waddy-Smith
Real, long-term benefits do not justify this proposal.
Real, long-term benefits do not justify this proposal.
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1878
Received: 06/08/2008
Respondent: London Southend Airport
In assessing the strategic fit against the objective of maximising the economic benefits of a thriving airport and related activity, the low probability of achieving the passenger forecasts and the limited number of airport-related jobs would suggest that this could be only a low strategic fit.
On the other hand, when assessing this scenario against the objective of ensuring appropriate improvements in sustainable transport accessibility and facilities, there would need to be much greater provision of public transport, cycling, walking or travel planning to the increased employment areas to achieve a high strategic fit.
In assessing the strategic fit against the objective of maximising the economic benefits of a thriving airport and related activity, the low probability of achieving the passenger forecasts and the limited number of airport-related jobs would suggest that this could be only a low strategic fit.
On the other hand, when assessing this scenario against the objective of ensuring appropriate improvements in sustainable transport accessibility and facilities, there would need to be much greater provision of public transport, cycling, walking or travel planning to the increased employment areas to achieve a high strategic fit.