5.2.1 Details
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1295
Received: 21/07/2008
Respondent: Mr Clifford Haddy
If we have to maintain an airport then this is the lesser evil but residents still need much greater environmental protection. My house shakes when old jets land or take off and that is primarily from runway noise.
If we have to maintain an airport then this is the lesser evil but residents still need much greater environmental protection. My house shakes when old jets land or take off and that is primarily from runway noise.
Comment
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1364
Received: 24/07/2008
Respondent: F Schwartzbard
This scenario would allow the airport to continue amd provide minimum disuption to the local residents.
This scenario would allow the airport to continue amd provide minimum disuption to the local residents.
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1460
Received: 26/07/2008
Respondent: Mr T Clark
The MRO business would NOT grow on this option. Restrictions on expansion at Southend would hold them back to the extent that they would relocate elsewhere.
The hotel would NOT thrive and would become downmarket.
The MRO business would NOT grow on this option. Restrictions on expansion at Southend would hold them back to the extent that they would relocate elsewhere.
The hotel would NOT thrive and would become downmarket.
Support
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1783
Received: 04/08/2008
Respondent: nick williams
the aviation industry has in the words of BA chief executive Willie Walsh run into a perfect storm , this is the wrong time to be expanding whilst Stanstead and other airports for the first time in decades are starting to have reduced passenger numbers and carriers who are beginning to lose commercial viability due to world oil prices
the aviation industry has in the words of BA chief executive Willie Walsh run into a perfect storm , this is the wrong time to be expanding whilst Stanstead and other airports for the first time in decades are starting to have reduced passenger numbers and carriers who are beginning to lose commercial viability due to world oil prices
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1812
Received: 05/08/2008
Respondent: Mrs Sally Hender
I am absolutely opposed to the growth of the airport, for many reasons. One I am a local resident and have lived in Rochford for 11 years to have the airport expansion would mean noise, pollution and would be dreadful for local people.
I am absolutely opposed to the growth of the airport, for many reasons. One I am a local resident and have lived in Rochford for 11 years to have the airport expansion would mean noise, pollution and would be dreadful for local people.
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1871
Received: 06/08/2008
Respondent: London Southend Airport
The full submission sets out the risk of having to reduce the runway length even further and issues relating to Green Belt and transport improvements with this scenario.
In Issue 1 under the heading Airport model and infrastructure, it could be noted that the Airport would be vulnerable to an inability to maintain its infrastructure in the face of increasing safety and security requirements. There is also a risk that the CAA will require an extension to the RESA at the north east end which would reduce the runway length even further, impacting on the Airport's MRO capability.
In Issue 3, under Green Belt, the boundary across the Airport would remain arbitrary and unrelated to natural features or existing development.
In Issue 4 under the heading Improvements, there is a need for improvements to public transport, cycling or walking for existing employment areas. However, with Scenario 1, there would be very limited opportunities for such improvements.
Support
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 1967
Received: 06/08/2008
Respondent: Mr Ian Syers
I wholly support this option â€" no development should take place on this vulnerable belt of green belt between Rochford and Southend, and certainly not development related to aviation, an activity that responsible authorities should be looking to discourage. The non green belt parts of the JAAP area should be redeveloped for housing and business, uses that are needed by most residents of SE Essex in one form or another, unlike aviation which is needed by almost nobody.
I wholly support this option â€" no development should take place on this vulnerable belt of green belt between Rochford and Southend, and certainly not development related to aviation, an activity that responsible authorities should be looking to discourage. The non green belt parts of the JAAP area should be redeveloped for housing and business, uses that are needed by most residents of SE Essex in one form or another, unlike aviation which is needed by almost nobody.
Object
London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper
Representation ID: 2049
Received: 07/08/2008
Respondent: C and S Associates
Agent: Firstplan
C and S Associates object to this option because it does not designate the Brickworks site for redevelopment.
The Brickworks site has been identified as a proposed Area for Change in Section 4.6 of the draft document and its redevelopment will enhance the visual quality of the area and bring environmental benefits.
The site should therefore be designated for residential development which will enable redevelopment of the site and assist in enabling Rochford to meet the PPS3 requirement to identify a 15 year housing land supply.
C and S Associates object to this option because it does not designate the Brickworks site for redevelopment.
The Brickworks site has been identified as a proposed Area for Change in Section 4.6 of the draft document and its redevelopment will enhance the visual quality of the area and bring environmental benefits.
The site should therefore be designated for residential development which will enable redevelopment of the site and assist in enabling Rochford to meet the PPS3 requirement to identify a 15 year housing land supply.