Comment
Issues and Options Document
Representation ID: 36576
Received: 07/03/2018
Respondent: Karen McNeela
Strategic Priority 1:
The scale of the proposed development in Hullbridge is disproportionate. The village atmosphere will be lost. If housing is to be developed it should be in keeping with the existing housing stock. Given the ageing population, it would be a good idea to build a good selection of bungalow style accommodation. This should be of good quality and in a modern design. The dwellings should be totally energy efficient with solar panels, under floor heating, LED lighting, excellent insulation etc.
Strategic Priority 2:
The current leisure facilities are very limited and thought needs to be given as to how this can be improved? A Swimming pool and Gym would be ideal.
Open spaces need to be preserved to allow for sporting events to continue- football, rugby, netball. With the obesity crisis we need to encourage both young and old to be more active. Better walkways along the river. Bicycle tracks etc.
Strategic Priority 3:
The infrastructure needs to be upgraded BEFORE new houses are built. One minor collision on Lower Road can lead to huge traffic jams (look at Canvey Island to see how bad the road situation can be.) We need better roads, and we desperately need a better rail service into London. If the housing stock is aimed more at retired people this will alleviate some of the transport problems. At present during rush hour Rayleigh Station is the last place that you can get a seat on the train. People are standing at Wickford. Hundreds more houses in Hullbridge cannot be supported by the current rail network.
Strategic Priority 4:
It goes without saying that new doctors, clinics, schools will be needed. We cannot cope with the influx without this infrastructure being in place BEFORE development goes ahead.
Strategic Priority 5:
The green belt is vital to protect us all. Flooding is often observed down Watery Lane (the clue is in the name!) The huge open area already earmarked is going to have a detrimental effect to the wildlife in the area.
Please think about the existing residents of Hullbridge, many of whom have lived here for most of their life. Some small scale, sensible development would be welcome but not the vast swathes the council has agreed to.
In summary:
* The plans should be scaled back to a more manageable level
* More thought given to the types of housing. Eco friendly modern bungalows would be more desirable and less of a blot on the landscape.
* Infrastructure must be upgraded before any development goes ahead.
Strategic Priority 1:
The scale of the proposed development in Hullbridge is disproportionate. The village atmosphere will be lost. If housing is to be developed it should be in keeping with the existing housing stock. Given the ageing population, it would be a good idea to build a good selection of bungalow style accommodation. This should be of good quality and in a modern design. The dwellings should be totally energy efficient with solar panels, under floor heating, LED lighting, excellent insulation etc.
Strategic Priority 2:
The current leisure facilities are very limited and thought needs to be given as to how this can be improved? A Swimming pool and Gym would be ideal.
Open spaces need to be preserved to allow for sporting events to continue- football, rugby, netball. With the obesity crisis we need to encourage both young and old to be more active. Better walkways along the river. Bicycle tracks etc.
Strategic Priority 3:
The infrastructure needs to be upgraded BEFORE new houses are built. One minor collision on Lower Road can lead to huge traffic jams (look at Canvey Island to see how bad the road situation can be.) We need better roads, and we desperately need a better rail service into London. If the housing stock is aimed more at retired people this will alleviate some of the transport problems. At present during rush hour Rayleigh Station is the last place that you can get a seat on the train. People are standing at Wickford. Hundreds more houses in Hullbridge cannot be supported by the current rail network.
Strategic Priority 4:
It goes without saying that new doctors, clinics, schools will be needed. We cannot cope with the influx without this infrastructure being in place BEFORE development goes ahead.
Strategic Priority 5:
The green belt is vital to protect us all. Flooding is often observed down Watery Lane (the clue is in the name!) The huge open area already earmarked is going to have a detrimental effect to the wildlife in the area.
Please think about the existing residents of Hullbridge, many of whom have lived here for most of their life. Some small scale, sensible development would be welcome but not the vast swathes the council has agreed to.
In summary:
* The plans should be scaled back to a more manageable level
* More thought given to the types of housing. Eco friendly modern bungalows would be more desirable and less of a blot on the landscape.
* Infrastructure must be upgraded before any development goes ahead.