Support

Issues and Options Document

Representation ID: 35464

Received: 07/03/2018

Respondent: Southern & Regional Developments Ltd

Agent: CLAREMONT PLANNING CONSUTLANCY LTD

Representation Summary:

We support Option B(2)

Full text:

On behalf of Southern & Regional Developments, Claremont Planning recognises the purpose and importance of delivering mixed communities; in turn providing affordable housing at appropriate levels within development schemes. However, the apparent under-provision of affordable units within the District does not demonstrate policy success, rather that an inconsistent application of policy has thwarted its effectiveness. This is not to say that the original policy levels and method of provision is ineffectual.

Threshold - Option B and the continuation of the current affordable threshold of 35% is the most appropriate option given the issue of viability on smaller sites and failure to achieve this level to date. If the threshold was increased the issue of viability could jeopardise the ability of smaller sites to deliver valuable housing numbers toward the authority's assessed need, as well as presenting an immediate obstruction to the development of previously developed sites. In contrast, Option B will retain the policy with focus upon overcoming viability concerns and maximising delivery of residential sites.