Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33420
Received: 17/01/2014
Respondent: mr david gillbee
twenty to twenty two units should be the max density for housing that land is unsuitable for anything denser on drainage grounds alone......from an apearance point of view 8 to 10 would be better anything that interferes with the view of the church i unacceptable also the infrerstructure of the village is stretched and any further development should be addressed first,,,,,water gas electricity fibre optic broadband school and medical service as well as public transport.
twenty to twenty two units should be the max density for housing that land is unsuitable for anything denser on drainage grounds alone......from an apearance point of view 8 to 10 would be better anything that interferes with the view of the church i unacceptable also the infrerstructure of the village is stretched and any further development should be addressed first,,,,,water gas electricity fibre optic broadband school and medical service as well as public transport.