Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33106
Received: 12/01/2014
Respondent: Craig Driscoll
The 5% cap should be kept. The whole process has been based on these figures, and to allow a possible unlimited increase at this stage makes the whole process flawed. There doesn't appear to be any provision to improve highways, drainage, schools and healthcare in the area, and any further increase than what is planned will put even more strain on local services. Why are sites in Rochford not being considered?
The 5% cap should be kept. The whole process has been based on these figures, and to allow a possible unlimited increase at this stage makes the whole process flawed. There doesn't appear to be any provision to improve highways, drainage, schools and healthcare in the area, and any further increase than what is planned will put even more strain on local services. Why are sites in Rochford not being considered?