I object to the removal of the 5% flexibility cap on the following grounds

Building more than the 550 houses plus 5% will impact severly on the quality of life not only for residents in the new properties, but for existing residents of the area/It makes all previous public consutations which were based on 550 plus maximum of 5% unsound and completely negates all previous evidence for sustainability. It is imperative that the residents, both current and those to come, have confidence that this development will not result in the greenbelt being overtaken by an unlimited urban sprawl and if the 5% cap is removed this confidence is also removed.