Object

Development Management DPD Preferred Policy Options Document

Representation ID: 28286

Received: 08/02/2012

Respondent: Barratt Eastern Counties

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

The policy or supporting text should acknowledge the apparent conflicts with Essex Design and explain that local character takes precedence.

Full text:

Paragraph 2.16/Figure 2 includes a density guide and explains that the chosen density is important in achieving efficient land uses and in maintaining high quality environments. The policy advice is supported, however, we note that Essex Design promotes some forms of development styles well below the average density levels identified in Figure 2. For example Arcadia Planning requires a density of 8 houses per hectare (page 18 of the Essex Design) and Boulevard Planning is between 13 and 20 houses per hectare (page 41 and page 42 of Essex Design). All the average densities within the District are 20 dwellings per hectare or higher. This apparent conflict has led to severe difficulties in designing schemes where local policy and character pulls in one direction and Essex Design guidance pulls in another. It should be made clear in the Policy or supporting text that local character and local policies take precedent and that Essex Design is not a prescriptive tool when issues of density are being considered.