Object

Core Strategy Submission Document

Representation ID: 15731

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr J Wiseman

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

UNSOUND , UNSUSTAINABLE ,DESTRUCTION OF GREEN BELT,NOT IN KEEPING WITH LOCAL AREA, INCREASED TRAFFIC CONGESTION, INCREASED POLLUTION,LACK OF INVESTMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE.NO SOCIAL OR ECONOMIC BENEFITS,LACK OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT NO POSITIVES ONLY NEGATIVES

Full text:

i think this core strategy is unsound because

UNDER PPS 12 THE DEVELOPMENT IS NOT SUSTAINABLE (SEE PREVIOUS EMAILS I HAVE SENT)

TRANSPORT

THEIR IS INSUFFICIENT PUBLIC TRANSPORT AND NO VIABLE/REALISTIC PLANS TO INCREASE IT.

DISTANCE FROM RAIL LINKS/SHOPS LEADING TO :-

INCREASED CONGESTION

NO POSSIBILITY/PLANS TO IMPROVE HIGHWAYS (SEE BELOW)

THERE IS NO VIABLE TRAVEL PLAN (REQUIRED FOR THIS SIZE DEVELEOPMENT 50+)


ENVIRONMENT

LOSS OF GREEN BELT + WILDLIFE

SEMI RURAL LOCATION

NOT IN KEEPING WITH LOCAL CHARACTER

NO SOCIAL ,ECONOMIC OR ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS TO RESIDENTS , ONLY TO LOCAL GOVT AND DEVELOPERS.THIS WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT ALL LOCAL RESIDENTS , RUIN OUR QUALITY OF LIFE SOLELY FOR DEVELOPERS TO MAKE MONEY AND THEN LEAVE.

PLEASE ACT ON THE BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE WHO ELECTED YOU AND RESPECT OUR WISHES.YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO OUR VOTE, I WILL, AND NO DOUBT OTHERS HOLD POLITCAL PARTIES TO ACCOUNT FOR THEIR ACTIONS AND VOTE FOR PARTIES THAT ACT FOR US NOT AGAINST US


APPARENTLY (YOUR) RDC PRINCIPLES WITHIN THE CORE STRATEGY STATES :

"SEEKS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES THAT WILL PROVIDE SOCIAL ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS"

"THERE IS A LIMIT TO HOW MUCH INFILLING AND INTENSIFICATION EXISTING SETTLEMENTS CAN SUSTAIN WITHOUT THIER CHARACTER BEING ADVERSELY AFFECTED"

"TO LOCATE DEVELOPEMENT IN AREAS WHERE ALTERNATIVES TO CAR USE ARE MORE VIABLE , REDUCE THE REQUIREMENT TO TRAVEL, MITIGATE THEIR IMPACT ON THE EXISTING NETWORK"

"PLANNING SHOULD BE WELL RELATED TO EXISTING PUBLIC TRANSPORT WHERE POSSIBLE"

I cannot see how anybody can argue the above development complies with your principles
Having read the core strategy for RDC and Hockley development plan etc their is 2 huge flaws in the strategy and that is sustainability and quality of life.

I do not see any serious plans to deal with the current volumes of traffic on the b1013 , Hall rd , Ashingdon Rd and the link via Cherry Orchard rd let alone to cope with any future developments.

Using the B1013 as an example during the "rush hour" between 7-9am and 4-6pm it is not usual to only average 5-10mph between Rayleigh and Hawkwell this rd carries thousands of cars per hour and is apparently the busiest B rd in the country yet more developments (housing, southend airport and Hockley village centre) are all planned with no increase in rd capacity.

THIS CAN ONLY INCREASE TRAFFIC, DECREASE TRAFFIC SPEEDS, INCREASE POLLUTION AND DECREASE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR ALL LOCAL INHABITANTS WITH NO DECERNIBLE BENEFITS FOR THE RESIDENTS


There has been a distinct lack of investment in the local infrastructure by the local authorities over the last 20 yrs with more developments happening every yr.

Being a resident here for the last 20yrs + i remember the council promising that when Cherry Orchard Rd was developed that it would be extended all the past via Hullbridge to link to the now "old" a130 , instead either by design or accident there was never enough money to complete the project and thus the level of traffic increase by my estimate 3 fold as people used the b1013 as a "rat run" via Carpenters Arms etc to avoid congestion from the Rayleigh Weir onwards on the a127 to/from Southend.

I remember when there was no development along Cherry Orchard rd, now we have 2 car dealers and a petrol station this rd connects to Tescos ,Rbs call centre more car dealers etc and the a127 with plans for yet more factories the only thing that has not increased is the rd capacity.


With the plans for further housing in Hawkwell , more factories along Cherry Orchard RD etc as part of the Southend Airport plan ,air traffic and the redevelopment of Hockley village centre (more housing) i think that during rush hour the traffic will be grid locked in this area unless the council complete Cherry orchard rd to the old and new a130 and put in an effective by pass for Rayleigh , Hockley , Hawkwell and Ashingdon so that traffic for Southend etc doesnt have to go through these areas.

This could be done easily and with little disturbance to local residents by extending Cherry Orchard across onto Lower rd and then connecting Canewdon rd to Great Stambridge and onto North Shoebury.