Site Assessment Proforma

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: BF01

 
Site Reference
BF01
Site Address
68-72 West Street, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.19
Potential Capacity (Housing)
10
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
3
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
4
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
1
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
5
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: BF02

 

 

Site Reference
BF02
Site Address
162-168 High Street, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.16
Potential Capacity (Housing)
14
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
2
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: BF03

 

 

Site Reference
BF03
Site Address
247 London Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.19
Potential Capacity (Housing)
10
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: BF05

 

 

Site Reference
BF05
Site Address
Castle Road Recycling Centre, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.30
Potential Capacity (Housing)
16
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
1
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS001

 

 

Site Reference
CFS001
Site Address
Rayleigh Garden Centre, Eastwood Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
1.30
Potential Capacity (Housing)
41
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS002

 

 

Site Reference
CFS002
Site Address
Land b/t Rectory Rd and Hall Road, Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
2.00
Potential Capacity (Housing)
62
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS003

 

 

Site Reference
CFS003
Site Address
Land at jtn The Drive and Disraeli Rd, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.39
Potential Capacity (Housing)
11
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS004

 

 

Site Reference
CFS004
Site Address
Land in Little Wakering Road, Barling
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
0.79
Potential Capacity (Housing)
26
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
3
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS005

 

 

Site Reference
CFS005
Site Address
Plot 13, South west side of London Rd, Rawreth
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.18
Potential Capacity (Housing)
7
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS006

 

 

Site Reference
CFS006
Site Address
Lane Field, Watery Lane, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
3.85
Potential Capacity (Housing)
101
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS007

 

 

Site Reference
CFS007
Site Address
Rear of Golden Cross Road, Ashingdon
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
1.37
Potential Capacity (Housing)
40
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS008

 

 

Site Reference
CFS008
Site Address
Land at The Chase, Ashingdon (Merged)
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.27
Potential Capacity (Housing)
5
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS010

 

 

Site Reference
CFS010
Site Address
Roverdene, Ellesmere Road, Ashingdon (Merged)
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.61
Potential Capacity (Housing)
14
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS011

 

 

Site Reference
CFS011
Site Address
Land b/t Victoria Dr, Seaview Dr Gt Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
0.84
Potential Capacity (Housing)
23
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
2
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
3
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
2
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
3

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS012

 

 

Site Reference
CFS012
Site Address
Land East of bend, Gardiners Lane, Canewdon
Settlement Cluster
Canewdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.45
Potential Capacity (Housing)
16
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
3
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS013

 

 

Site Reference
CFS013
Site Address
Land at rear of Newton Hall Gardens, Ashingdon
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
3.72
Potential Capacity (Housing)
99
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
2
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS014

 

 

Site Reference
CFS014
Site Address
Land opposite 1 to 10 Disraeli Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.70
Potential Capacity (Housing)
23
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS015

 

 

Site Reference
CFS015
Site Address
Land SE of Lower Rd&Hullbridge Rd jtn, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
2.33
Potential Capacity (Housing)
78
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS016

 

 

Site Reference
CFS016
Site Address
Tyndol, Chelmsford Road, Rawreth
Settlement Cluster
Rawreth
Site Size (Ha)
0.37
Potential Capacity (Housing)
14
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
1
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
2
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS017

 

 

Site Reference
CFS017
Site Address
Greenacres, Victor Gardens, Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
1.35
Potential Capacity (Housing)
68
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS018

 

 

Site Reference
CFS018
Site Address
Land b/t The Grange & Red Roof, Ironwell Lane
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.48
Potential Capacity (Housing)
25
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS019

 

 

Site Reference
CFS019
Site Address
Land adj to Newhall Road and Lower Road, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.98
Potential Capacity (Housing)
32
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS020

 

 

Site Reference
CFS020
Site Address
Land r/o St Marys Church, Rectory Rd, Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
3.79
Potential Capacity (Housing)
94
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
3

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS021

 

 

Site Reference
CFS021
Site Address
Land b/t Cynara&Holmfield, Canewdon Rd, Ashingdon
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.34
Potential Capacity (Housing)
14
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS022

 

 

Site Reference
CFS022
Site Address
Meadowbrook Farm, Ironwell Lane, Rochford (Merged)
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
7.94
Potential Capacity (Housing)
393
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
3
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
4
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
5
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS023

 

 

Site Reference
CFS023
Site Address
Land north and east of Malvern Road, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
4.94
Potential Capacity (Housing)
139
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
1
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
2
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS024

 

 

Site Reference
CFS024
Site Address
Land north of Merryfields Avenue, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.96
Potential Capacity (Housing)
39
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
3
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
1
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
4
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS025

 

 

Site Reference
CFS025
Site Address
Land south of Montefiore Avenue, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.52
Potential Capacity (Housing)
17
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS026

 

 

Site Reference
CFS026
Site Address
Land east side of Kingsway, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
0.48
Potential Capacity (Housing)
14
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS027

 

 

Site Reference
CFS027
Site Address
Land north of Bull Lane, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
4.62
Potential Capacity (Housing)
114
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
2
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS028

 

 

Site Reference
CFS028
Site Address
Land adjacent to Brayside, Brays Lane, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.10
Potential Capacity (Housing)
6
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS029

 

 

Site Reference
CFS029
Site Address
Land at Turrett Farm, Napier Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.91
Potential Capacity (Housing)
29
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS030

 

 

Site Reference
CFS030
Site Address
Creek View, Beckney Avenue, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.17
Potential Capacity (Housing)
7
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
1
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
2
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
4
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS031

 

 

Site Reference
CFS031
Site Address
Land n of Rawreth Ln&e of Parkhurst Dr, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.85
Potential Capacity (Housing)
26
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS032

 

 

Site Reference
CFS032
Site Address
Land west of Pudsey Hall Lane, Canewdon
Settlement Cluster
Rural
Site Size (Ha)
0.80
Potential Capacity (Housing)
26
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – too remote
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
1
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS033

 

 

Site Reference
CFS033
Site Address
Land south of Pooles Lane, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
5.26
Potential Capacity (Housing)
132
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
2
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS034

 

 

Site Reference
CFS034
Site Address
Land adj Newhouse Farm, Poynters Ln, Gt Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
1.54
Potential Capacity (Housing)
50
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS035

 

 

Site Reference
CFS035
Site Address
Land w & n of Rochford Hall, Hall Rd, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
1.44
Potential Capacity (Housing)
44
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
5
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS036

 

 

Site Reference
CFS036
Site Address
Land adj to Rectory Terrace, Rectory Rd, Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.31
Potential Capacity (Housing)
10
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS037

 

 

Site Reference
CFS037
Site Address
The Ramblers & Dahlia Lodge, Eastwood Rise, Leigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
1.43
Potential Capacity (Housing)
43
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS038

 

 

Site Reference
CFS038
Site Address
Plots 138/139/140, Lyndhurst Rd, Ashingdon
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.20
Potential Capacity (Housing)
8
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS039

 

 

Site Reference
CFS039
Site Address
Plots 1/2/3 New Hall Estate,Greensward Ln,Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.18
Potential Capacity (Housing)
7
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
3
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS040

 

 

Site Reference
CFS040
Site Address
Eastview House & Haslemere, Church Road, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
1.11
Potential Capacity (Housing)
40
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS041

 

 

Site Reference
CFS041
Site Address
La Vallee Farm, Lower Road, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
3.16
Potential Capacity (Housing)
89
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS042

 

 

Site Reference
CFS042
Site Address
Tower Farm, Lower Road, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
2.48
Potential Capacity (Housing)
74
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS043

 

 

Site Reference
CFS043
Site Address
Bolt Hall Farm, Lark Hill Road, Canewdon
Settlement Cluster
Canewdon
Site Size (Ha)
8.38
Potential Capacity (Housing)
192
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – too remote
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS044

 

 

Site Reference
CFS044
Site Address
15 Southview Cl,270 Eastwood Rd,Acacia Nurs,Ray
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
3.76
Potential Capacity (Housing)
104
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS045

 

 

Site Reference
CFS045
Site Address
Belcha3s Scout Site, Holyoak Lane, Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
7.30
Potential Capacity (Housing)
152
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
1
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
2
Impact on Local Habitats
1
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
1
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
4
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
3
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
3

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS046

 

 

Site Reference
CFS046
Site Address
Plots 37-39 Ashingdon Park Estate,Arundel Rd,Ash
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.19
Potential Capacity (Housing)
7
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS047

 

 

Site Reference
CFS047
Site Address
36 Connaught Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.37
Potential Capacity (Housing)
14
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS048

 

 

Site Reference
CFS048
Site Address
287 Daws Heath Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
1.38
Potential Capacity (Housing)
41
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS049

 

 

Site Reference
CFS049
Site Address
72 Main Road, Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.24
Potential Capacity (Housing)
9
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
3
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
4
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
3

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS050

 

 

Site Reference
CFS050
Site Address
Former Castle Point and Rochford Adult Community College, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
3.10
Potential Capacity (Housing)
84
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
4
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS051

 

 

Site Reference
CFS051
Site Address
Plots 74 to 79 Fambridge Road, Ashingdon
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.40
Potential Capacity (Housing)
14
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS052

 

 

Site Reference
CFS052
Site Address
Land n of Merrifields, Lark Hill Road, Canewdon
Settlement Cluster
Rural
Site Size (Ha)
3.91
Potential Capacity (Housing)
106
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – too remote
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
1
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS053

 

 

Site Reference
CFS053
Site Address
Land s of 38 and 39 Wellington Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
4.77
Potential Capacity (Housing)
123
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS054

 

 

Site Reference
CFS054
Site Address
Land rear of 17 and 19 South View Close, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
1.75
Potential Capacity (Housing)
32
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS055

 

 

Site Reference
CFS055
Site Address
Fairlawns Farm, Arterial Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
5.33
Potential Capacity (Housing)
126
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
2
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
1
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
2
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
1
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS056

 

 

Site Reference
CFS056
Site Address
Stewards Yard, Wakering Road, Great Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
1.11
Potential Capacity (Housing)
33
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for Exclusion – flood risk
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
2
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
2
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS057

 

 

Site Reference
CFS057
Site Address
Land e of Star Ln&n of Poynters Ln, Gt Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
73.58
Potential Capacity (Housing)
1001
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
1
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
2
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
3
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
5
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS058

 

 

Site Reference
CFS058
Site Address
Land south of Anchor Lane, Canewdon
Settlement Cluster
Canewdon
Site Size (Ha)
8.73
Potential Capacity (Housing)
194
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS059

 

 

Site Reference
CFS059
Site Address
Land at Sandhill Road, Eastwood
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.58
Potential Capacity (Housing)
20
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS060

 

 

Site Reference
CFS060
Site Address
Land west of Little Wakering Road, Little Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
0.87
Potential Capacity (Housing)
27
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
2
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
3
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS061

 

 

Site Reference
CFS061
Site Address
Land b/t Lambourne Hall Rd&Gardiners Ln,Canewdon
Settlement Cluster
Canewdon
Site Size (Ha)
4.35
Potential Capacity (Housing)
112
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
2
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS062

 

 

Site Reference
CFS062
Site Address
Land n of Lambourne Hall Rd, Canewdon
Settlement Cluster
Canewdon
Site Size (Ha)
5.79
Potential Capacity (Housing)
141
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS063

 

 

Site Reference
CFS063
Site Address
Land south of Watts Lane, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
1.50
Potential Capacity (Housing)
47
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
2
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
5
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
5
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS064

 

 

Site Reference
CFS064
Site Address
Land north and east of Folly Chase, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
9.05
Potential Capacity (Housing)
214
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
1
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
1
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS065

 

 

Site Reference
CFS065
Site Address
Land e of Shoebury Rd&s of New Road,Gt Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
14.96
Potential Capacity (Housing)
335
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
2
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS066

 

 

Site Reference
CFS066
Site Address
Circus Field, land w of Southend Road, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
1.29
Potential Capacity (Housing)
40
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS067

 

 

Site Reference
CFS067
Site Address
Three Ashes, land s of Tinkers Lane, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
11.50
Potential Capacity (Housing)
265
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
2
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
2
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS068

 

 

Site Reference
CFS068
Site Address
Land at Lower Wyburns Farm,s of Daws Heath Rd,Ray
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
3.60
Potential Capacity (Housing)
96
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS069

 

 

Site Reference
CFS069
Site Address
Land at Lower Wyburns Farm,nof Daws Heath Rd,Ray
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.96
Potential Capacity (Housing)
31
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
3
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS070

 

 

Site Reference
CFS070
Site Address
Land s of Conway Ave,w of Shoebury Rd,Gt Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
5.00
Potential Capacity (Housing)
125
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
2
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS071

 

 

Site Reference
CFS071
Site Address
Land north of Barling Road, Barling
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
4.29
Potential Capacity (Housing)
111
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS072

 

 

Site Reference
CFS072
Site Address
Land s of Cagefield Rd&e of Stambridge Rd,Stambrid
Settlement Cluster
Stambridge
Site Size (Ha)
4.92
Potential Capacity (Housing)
167
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS073

 

 

Site Reference
CFS073
Site Address
Land nof Cagefield Rd&e of Stambridge Rd,Stambrid
Settlement Cluster
Stambridge
Site Size (Ha)
2.74
Potential Capacity (Housing)
74
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS074

 

 

Site Reference
CFS074
Site Address
Land south of Mount Bovers Lane, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
22.80
Potential Capacity (Housing)
498
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
4
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS075

 

 

Site Reference
CFS075
Site Address
Land at Canewdon Hall Farm, Canewdon
Settlement Cluster
Canewdon
Site Size (Ha)
6.17
Potential Capacity (Housing)
150
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
Marginal
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
2
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS076

 

 

Site Reference
CFS076
Site Address
Land to the north of Sutton Road, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
7.78
Potential Capacity (Housing)
191
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
2
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS077

 

 

Site Reference
CFS077
Site Address
Land to the north of Great Wheatley Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
11.27
Potential Capacity (Housing)
263
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
2
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS078

 

 

Site Reference
CFS078
Site Address
Land w/Cherry Orchard Way&s/CO Ln, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
15.85
Potential Capacity (Housing)
360
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
2
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS079

 

 

Site Reference
CFS079
Site Address
Land w/Cherry Orchard Way and e/CO Ln, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
2.79
Potential Capacity (Housing)
74
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS080

 

 

Site Reference
CFS080
Site Address
Land east of Cherry Orchard Way, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
5.63
Potential Capacity (Housing)
135
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS081

 

 

Site Reference
CFS081
Site Address
Land at Stroud Green, n of Hall Road, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
12.40
Potential Capacity (Housing)
288
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS082

 

 

Site Reference
CFS082
Site Address
Land between Ironwell Lane & Hall Road, Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
41.95
Potential Capacity (Housing)
967
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
2
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS083

 

 

Site Reference
CFS083
Site Address
Land south of Hall Rd&west of Ark Lane, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
11.26
Potential Capacity (Housing)
264
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS084

 

 

Site Reference
CFS084
Site Address
Land south of Hall Road, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
10.65
Potential Capacity (Housing)
251
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS085

 

 

Site Reference
CFS085
Site Address
Land west&north of Rochford Hall,Hall Rd,Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
1.34
Potential Capacity (Housing)
78
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✘
Deliverable?
Not deliverable or developable
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
5
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS086

 

 

Site Reference
CFS086
Site Address
Lnd b/t Rivendell&Brookside,Napier Rd,Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.30
Potential Capacity (Housing)
11
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS087

 

 

Site Reference
CFS087
Site Address
Land b/t Western Road&Weir Farm Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
4.66
Potential Capacity (Housing)
108
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
3
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
2
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS088

 

 

Site Reference
CFS088
Site Address
Land b/t The Brambles&Bo Via,Clements Hall Ln
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.22
Potential Capacity (Housing)
10
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS089

 

 

Site Reference
CFS089
Site Address
Land adjacent to Dunsmure, The Drive, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.15
Potential Capacity (Housing)
7
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS090

 

 

Site Reference
CFS090
Site Address
Land s of Paglesham Road, Paglesham East End
Settlement Cluster
Paglesham
Site Size (Ha)
0.38
Potential Capacity (Housing)
13
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – flood risk
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
2
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
1
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS092

 

 

Site Reference
CFS092
Site Address
Moat Farm, Chelmsford Rd, Rawreth, Wickford
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
0.52
Potential Capacity (Housing)
16
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
2
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS093

 

 

Site Reference
CFS093
Site Address
Greenacres&adjacent land,Victor Gdns, Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.96
Potential Capacity (Housing)
29
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS094

 

 

Site Reference
CFS094
Site Address
Land west of Ash Green, Canewdon
Settlement Cluster
Canewdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.47
Potential Capacity (Housing)
17
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
3
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS095

 

 

Site Reference
CFS095
Site Address
Peggle Meadow, Southend Road, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
3.83
Potential Capacity (Housing)
102
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
4
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS096

 

 

Site Reference
CFS096
Site Address
43-45 South Street, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.18
Potential Capacity (Housing)
14
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
5
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
5
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS097

 

 

Site Reference
CFS097
Site Address
Tithe Park, Poynters Lane, Great Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
34.21
Potential Capacity (Housing)
749
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS098

 

 

Site Reference
CFS098
Site Address
Land north of Napier Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
1.70
Potential Capacity (Housing)
53
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS099

 

 

Site Reference
CFS099
Site Address
Land west of Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
37.82
Potential Capacity (Housing)
851
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
1
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS100

 

 

Site Reference
CFS100
Site Address
Nevendon Salvage&adj land to e, Lower Rd
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
3.28
Potential Capacity (Housing)
83
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS102

 

 

Site Reference
CFS102
Site Address
Land n of Eastwood Rd, e of The Drive, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
3.13
Potential Capacity (Housing)
77
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS103

 

 

Site Reference
CFS103
Site Address
Rosedene, Barrow Hall Road, Barling
Settlement Cluster
Rural
Site Size (Ha)
0.94
Potential Capacity (Housing)
94
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
1
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
2
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS105

 

 

Site Reference
CFS105
Site Address
Land north of Hambo Hill, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
10.49
Potential Capacity (Housing)
242
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
2
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS106

 

 

Site Reference
CFS106
Site Address
Land b/t Couplings&Nebkitt, Wellington Ave,Hull
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.53
Potential Capacity (Housing)
18
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS107

 

 

Site Reference
CFS107
Site Address
Land south of Roaming,Wellington Rd, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
0.50
Potential Capacity (Housing)
18
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS108

 

 

Site Reference
CFS108
Site Address
Land n Friday Woods, Wellington Rd, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
0.17
Potential Capacity (Housing)
6
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS110

 

 

Site Reference
CFS110
Site Address
The Bush, Wellington Avenue, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
0.23
Potential Capacity (Housing)
9
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS111

 

 

Site Reference
CFS111
Site Address
Land north of Coombes Grove, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
3.99
Potential Capacity (Housing)
104
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS112

 

 

Site Reference
CFS112
Site Address
Land w of Stambridge Mills, Mill Lane, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
2.80
Potential Capacity (Housing)
76
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
2
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
2
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
2
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS113

 

 

Site Reference
CFS113
Site Address
Land to the east of Mill Lane, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
1.50
Potential Capacity (Housing)
39
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
2
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
2
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS114

 

 

Site Reference
CFS114
Site Address
Land r/oCherry Tree pub,Stambridge Rd,Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
1.27
Potential Capacity (Housing)
39
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
2
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS115

 

 

Site Reference
CFS115
Site Address
Land w of Little Wakering Road, Gt Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
4.43
Potential Capacity (Housing)
120
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS116

 

 

Site Reference
CFS116
Site Address
Land s of Coombes Farm, Stambridge Rd, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
12.49
Potential Capacity (Housing)
411
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
2
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS117

 

 

Site Reference
CFS117
Site Address
120-122 Stambridge Road, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.03
Potential Capacity (Housing)
10
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS118

 

 

Site Reference
CFS118
Site Address
The Paddock,Clements Hall Way,Rectory Rd,Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.39
Potential Capacity (Housing)
12
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS119

 

 

Site Reference
CFS119
Site Address
Land south of King George's Field, Ashingdon
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
5.04
Potential Capacity (Housing)
127
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
2
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS120

 

 

Site Reference
CFS120
Site Address
Land e of Kingsway&Cranleigh Gardens,Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
0.14
Potential Capacity (Housing)
5
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS121

 

 

Site Reference
CFS121
Site Address
Land North of A127, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
61.15
Potential Capacity (Housing)
1347
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
2
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
1
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
5
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS122

 

 

Site Reference
CFS122
Site Address
N Paglesham Rd,w Waterside Rd,Paglesham East End
Settlement Cluster
Paglesham
Site Size (Ha)
0.49
Potential Capacity (Housing)
17
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – flood risk
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Not deliverable or developable
Overall Flood Risk
2
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
1
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS123

 

 

Site Reference
CFS123
Site Address
1&2 Sutton Ford Cottages,Sutton Rd,Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.33
Potential Capacity (Housing)
12
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
2
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS124

 

 

Site Reference
CFS124
Site Address
Land east of Little Stambridge Hall Ln,Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
2.30
Potential Capacity (Housing)
63
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
2
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS126

 

 

Site Reference
CFS126
Site Address
Land north of Brays Lane, Ashingdon
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
9.22
Potential Capacity (Housing)
247
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS127

 

 

Site Reference
CFS127
Site Address
Eastwood Nurseries, off Bartletts, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
7.72
Potential Capacity (Housing)
203
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
2
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
2
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS128

 

 

Site Reference
CFS128
Site Address
Land adjacent to 205 Lower Road, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
2.11
Potential Capacity (Housing)
63
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS129

 

 

Site Reference
CFS129
Site Address
Boness, Canewdon View Road, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.60
Potential Capacity (Housing)
22
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS130

 

 

Site Reference
CFS130
Site Address
Lavender Lodge, Canewdon View Road, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.76
Potential Capacity (Housing)
23
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS131

 

 

Site Reference
CFS131
Site Address
Beehive, Canewdon View Road, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
1.41
Potential Capacity (Housing)
22
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS132

 

 

Site Reference
CFS132
Site Address
Ivanhoe Nursery, Ironwell Lane, Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.86
Potential Capacity (Housing)
7
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS133

 

 

Site Reference
CFS133
Site Address
Land s of Ashingdon Rd,Ashingdon Rd,Ashingdon
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
3.79
Potential Capacity (Housing)
87
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS134

 

 

Site Reference
CFS134
Site Address
Land b/t Eastwood Rise&Rayleigh Ave, Eastwood
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
5.99
Potential Capacity (Housing)
146
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
1
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
2
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS135

 

 

Site Reference
CFS135
Site Address
Land at Flemings Farm Road, Eastwood
Settlement Cluster
Rural
Site Size (Ha)
10.00
Potential Capacity (Housing)
218
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
1
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
2
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
3
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
3
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
2
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS136

 

 

Site Reference
CFS136
Site Address
The Dell, Madrid Avenue, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
2.60
Potential Capacity (Housing)
74
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS137

 

 

Site Reference
CFS137
Site Address
Land at Hambro Nurseries,Chelmsford Rd,Rawreth
Settlement Cluster
Rawreth
Site Size (Ha)
9.75
Potential Capacity (Housing)
228
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
2
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS138

 

 

Site Reference
CFS138
Site Address
Land south of Windermere Avenue, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
1.13
Potential Capacity (Housing)
37
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS139

 

 

Site Reference
CFS139
Site Address
Land north of Hooley Drive, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.54
Potential Capacity (Housing)
17
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS140

 

 

Site Reference
CFS140
Site Address
Old Nursery, Ironwell Lane, Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.32
Potential Capacity (Housing)
10
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS141

 

 

Site Reference
CFS141
Site Address
Stewards Elm Farm, Great Stambridge
Settlement Cluster
Stambridge
Site Size (Ha)
9.87
Potential Capacity (Housing)
231
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS142

 

 

Site Reference
CFS142
Site Address
Land at Barrow Hall Road, Little Wakering
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
0.16
Potential Capacity (Housing)
6
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS144

 

 

Site Reference
CFS144
Site Address
Land adj Chichester Hall, London Road, Rawreth
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
15.62
Potential Capacity (Housing)
135
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS145

 

 

Site Reference
CFS145
Site Address
Land adj Chichester Hall, London Road, Rawreth
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
1.23
Potential Capacity (Housing)
19
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS146

 

 

Site Reference
CFS146
Site Address
Land at Rawreth Hall Farm, Rawreth
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
40.52
Potential Capacity (Housing)
905
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS147

 

 

Site Reference
CFS147
Site Address
Land North of London Road, Rawreth
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
24.76
Potential Capacity (Housing)
586
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS148

 

 

Site Reference
CFS148
Site Address
Land North of Rawreth Lane, Rawreth
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
24.95
Potential Capacity (Housing)
562
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS149

 

 

Site Reference
CFS149
Site Address
Hullbridge Hill, Watery Lane, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
15.90
Potential Capacity (Housing)
476
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
2
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS150

 

 

Site Reference
CFS150
Site Address
Land on the North side of Victor Gardens, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
1.99
Potential Capacity (Housing)
61
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
3

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS151

 

 

Site Reference
CFS151
Site Address
Long Lane, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
2.71
Potential Capacity (Housing)
74
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS152

 

 

Site Reference
CFS152
Site Address
Cherry Hill Farm, Chelmsford Road, Rawreth
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
0.73
Potential Capacity (Housing)
24
Available for Housing?
✘ - Traveller only
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
None – only promoted for traveller accommodation
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS153

 

 

Site Reference
CFS153
Site Address
Land West of Common Road, Great Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
2.12
Potential Capacity (Housing)
67
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – flood risk
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
2
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS155

 

 

Site Reference
CFS155
Site Address
Land at Fossetts Farm, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
9.34
Potential Capacity (Housing)
225
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS156

 

 

Site Reference
CFS156
Site Address
Lime and Poplar Court, Greensward Lane, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.59
Potential Capacity (Housing)
18
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
5
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS157

 

 

Site Reference
CFS157
Site Address
Sangster Court, Church Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.38
Potential Capacity (Housing)
9
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS158

 

 

Site Reference
CFS158
Site Address
St Luke's Place, Dalys Road, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
1.42
Potential Capacity (Housing)
43
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✘
Deliverable?
Not deliverable or developable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
4
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS159

 

 

Site Reference
CFS159
Site Address
563A Ashingdon Road and land adj Chase, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.20
Potential Capacity (Housing)
11
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS160

 

 

Site Reference
CFS160
Site Address
Northlands Farm, 65 High Road, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
2.50
Potential Capacity (Housing)
75
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
1
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
1
Impact on Local Habitats
1
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS161

 

 

Site Reference
CFS161
Site Address
57 High Road, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
1.52
Potential Capacity (Housing)
49
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS162

 

 

Site Reference
CFS162
Site Address
Land rear of 158 Rawreth Lane, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
1.15
Potential Capacity (Housing)
37
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS163

 

 

Site Reference
CFS163
Site Address
Land at Lubards Lodge Farm, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
5.03
Potential Capacity (Housing)
129
Available for Housing?
✘
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Not deliverable or developable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS164

 

 

Site Reference
CFS164
Site Address
Lubards Lodge Farm, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
43.25
Potential Capacity (Housing)
931
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
5
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS166

 

 

Site Reference
CFS166
Site Address
Paglesham Church End
Settlement Cluster
Paglesham
Site Size (Ha)
2.46
Potential Capacity (Housing)
72
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – too rmeote
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Not deliverable or developable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
1
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS168

 

 

Site Reference
CFS168
Site Address
Rayleigh Golf Range, Chelmsford Road, Rawreth
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
5.26
Potential Capacity (Housing)
126
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS169

 

 

Site Reference
CFS169
Site Address
Meadowlands, Victor Gardens, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
4.85
Potential Capacity (Housing)
130
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
2
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS170

 

 

Site Reference
CFS170
Site Address
Land North of Rawreth Lane, Rawreth
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
3.08
Potential Capacity (Housing)
85
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS171

 

 

Site Reference
CFS171
Site Address
Land North of Rawreth Lane, Rawreth
Settlement Cluster
Rawreth
Site Size (Ha)
14.91
Potential Capacity (Housing)
343
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
2
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS172

 

 

Site Reference
CFS172
Site Address
Land At Cracknells Farm, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
24.70
Potential Capacity (Housing)
864
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS173

 

 

Site Reference
CFS173
Site Address
Takeley, Creeksea Ferry Road, Canewdon
Settlement Cluster
Canewdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.46
Potential Capacity (Housing)
16
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – too remote
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
2
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
4
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS177

 

 

Site Reference
CFS177
Site Address
Land at Beeches Farm, Rawreth
Settlement Cluster
Rawreth
Site Size (Ha)
9.27
Potential Capacity (Housing)
325
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
1
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS178

 

 

Site Reference
CFS178
Site Address
Rear of Rutland, The Drive, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.16
Potential Capacity (Housing)
6
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✘
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS180

 

 

Site Reference
CFS180
Site Address
Land East of Highcliff Crescent, Ashingdon
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
1.74
Potential Capacity (Housing)
61
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS181

 

 

Site Reference
CFS181
Site Address
The Stables, Ethel Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.47
Potential Capacity (Housing)
16
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS182

 

 

Site Reference
CFS182
Site Address
High Gables, Rayleigh Downs Road, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.48
Potential Capacity (Housing)
17
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
2
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS187

 

 

Site Reference
CFS187
Site Address
Land north of Arundel Road, Ashingdon
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.35
Potential Capacity (Housing)
12
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
2
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS188

 

 

Site Reference
CFS188
Site Address
Land btwn Ellesmere & Ethelbert Rd, Ashingdon
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.40
Potential Capacity (Housing)
14
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS190

 

 

Site Reference
CFS190
Site Address
Land south of Pooles Lane, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
8.84
Potential Capacity (Housing)
309
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS191

 

 

Site Reference
CFS191
Site Address
Land at Mount Bovers Lane, Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.94
Potential Capacity (Housing)
33
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
4
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
3

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS192

 

 

Site Reference
CFS192
Site Address
Land west of Little Wakering Road, L. Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
12.21
Potential Capacity (Housing)
423
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
3

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS193

 

 

Site Reference
CFS193
Site Address
Land south of Pooles Lane, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
4.11
Potential Capacity (Housing)
144
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
2
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS194

 

 

Site Reference
CFS194
Site Address
Land north of Rectory Road, Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
15.01
Potential Capacity (Housing)
516
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS195

 

 

Site Reference
CFS195
Site Address
Land at New Hourse Farm, G. Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
1.61
Potential Capacity (Housing)
13
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – flood risk
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
2
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS197

 

 

Site Reference
CFS197
Site Address
Land r/o 185 Greensward Lane, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.51
Potential Capacity (Housing)
18
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS198

 

 

Site Reference
CFS198
Site Address
Land at 195 Greensward Lane, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
1.55
Potential Capacity (Housing)
54
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS199

 

 

Site Reference
CFS199
Site Address
Land r/o 155 Greensward Lane, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
1.43
Potential Capacity (Housing)
50
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
2
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
5
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS201

 

 

Site Reference
CFS201
Site Address
Land adj 41-45 Crouch View Crescent, Hockley, Esse
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.77
Potential Capacity (Housing)
27
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
2
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS204

 

 

Site Reference
CFS204
Site Address
Land at / r/o 139 Greensward Lane, Hockley, Essex
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.41
Potential Capacity (Housing)
14
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
5
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS206

 

 

Site Reference
CFS206
Site Address
159 Greensward Lane, Hockley, SS5 5JH
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.26
Potential Capacity (Housing)
9
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✘
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
2
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
5
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS207

 

 

Site Reference
CFS207
Site Address
1 Disraeli Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 8XP
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.16
Potential Capacity (Housing)
6
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✘
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS212

 

 

Site Reference
CFS212
Site Address
Land at Rayleigh Downs Rd & Arterial Rd, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.66
Potential Capacity (Housing)
23
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
2
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS213

 

 

Site Reference
CFS213
Site Address
Site on Apton Hall Road, Ballards Gore Golf Club
Settlement Cluster
Stambridge
Site Size (Ha)
1.48
Potential Capacity (Housing)
52
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – too remote
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
2
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS216

 

 

Site Reference
CFS216
Site Address
Land at Fambridge Road, Ashingdon
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
13.28
Potential Capacity (Housing)
465
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS217

 

 

Site Reference
CFS217
Site Address
Land at Doggetts Chase, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
4.97
Potential Capacity (Housing)
174
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
2
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS218

 

 

Site Reference
CFS218
Site Address
Land at Oxford Road, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.62
Potential Capacity (Housing)
22
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
1
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS219

 

 

Site Reference
CFS219
Site Address
Ivanhoe, Ironwell Lane, Hockley, Essex, SS5 4JY
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.45
Potential Capacity (Housing)
16
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS220

 

 

Site Reference
CFS220
Site Address
Land at Rawreth Lane, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.41
Potential Capacity (Housing)
14
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
2
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS221

 

 

Site Reference
CFS221
Site Address
Hollowdene, Hooley Drive, Rayleigh, SS6 9RA
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
1.19
Potential Capacity (Housing)
42
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS222

 

 

Site Reference
CFS222
Site Address
Land at Dollymans Farm, Doublegate Lane, Rawreth,
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
99.75
Potential Capacity (Housing)
3491
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
2
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
5
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS223

 

 

Site Reference
CFS223
Site Address
Land at Dollymans Farm, Doublegate Lane, Rawreth,
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
5.58
Potential Capacity (Housing)
195
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS224

 

 

Site Reference
CFS224
Site Address
Land at Dollymans Farm, Doublegate Lane, Rawreth,
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
1.90
Potential Capacity (Housing)
66
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
2
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS225

 

 

Site Reference
CFS225
Site Address
Land at Dollymans Farm, Doublegate Lane, Rawreth,
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
3.08
Potential Capacity (Housing)
79
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
2
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS226

 

 

Site Reference
CFS226
Site Address
Land at Dollymans Farm, Doublegate Lane, Rawreth,
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
5.48
Potential Capacity (Housing)
192
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS227

 

 

Site Reference
CFS227
Site Address
Land at Dollymans Farm, Doublegate Lane, Rawreth,
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
3.24
Potential Capacity (Housing)
104
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS228

 

 

Site Reference
CFS228
Site Address
Land at Dollymans Farm, Doublegate Lane, Rawreth,
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
9.67
Potential Capacity (Housing)
321
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS229

 

 

Site Reference
CFS229
Site Address
Land at Dollymans Farm, Doublegate Lane, Rawreth,
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
8.26
Potential Capacity (Housing)
29
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Not deliverable or developable
Overall Flood Risk
2
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS230

 

 

Site Reference
CFS230
Site Address
Land at Dollymans Farm, Doublegate Lane, Rawreth,
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
0.26
Potential Capacity (Housing)
5
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
3
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS231

 

 

Site Reference
CFS231
Site Address
Land at Dollymans Farm, Doublegate Lane, Rawreth,
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
3.98
Potential Capacity (Housing)
115
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS232

 

 

Site Reference
CFS232
Site Address
Land at Dollymans Farm, Doublegate Lane, Rawreth,
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
6.89
Potential Capacity (Housing)
226
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
2
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS233

 

 

Site Reference
CFS233
Site Address
Land at Battlesbridge Nursery, Chelmsford Road, Es
Settlement Cluster
Rawreth
Site Size (Ha)
0.91
Potential Capacity (Housing)
32
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
1
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
1
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS234

 

 

Site Reference
CFS234
Site Address
Appledore, Wadham Park Avenue, Hockley, SS5 6AL
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
0.66
Potential Capacity (Housing)
23
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
2
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS236

 

 

Site Reference
CFS236
Site Address
Land at New Park Road, Hockley, Essex, SS5 5JX
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.30
Potential Capacity (Housing)
10
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
2
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS237

 

 

Site Reference
CFS237
Site Address
La Mare, Wadham Park Avenue, Hockley, SS5 6AL
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
1.31
Potential Capacity (Housing)
46
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS238

 

 

Site Reference
CFS238
Site Address
Shotgate Farm, London Road, Wickford (North)
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
3.53
Potential Capacity (Housing)
123
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS239

 

 

Site Reference
CFS239
Site Address
Shotgate Farm, London Road, Wickford (South)
Settlement Cluster
East of Wickford
Site Size (Ha)
8.92
Potential Capacity (Housing)
312
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
2
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS240

 

 

Site Reference
CFS240
Site Address
Old Parsonage, Ironwell Lane, Hawkwell, Essex, SS5
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.57
Potential Capacity (Housing)
20
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS242

 

 

Site Reference
CFS242
Site Address
47 Victor Gardens, Hockley, SS5 4DS
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.39
Potential Capacity (Housing)
14
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
Marginal
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
4
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
3

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS243

 

 

Site Reference
CFS243
Site Address
Land south of Vanderbilt Avenue (Section B)
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
0.53
Potential Capacity (Housing)
19
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – too remote
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
2
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS244

 

 

Site Reference
CFS244
Site Address
Land south of Vanderbilt Avenue (Section D)
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
0.54
Potential Capacity (Housing)
19
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – too remote
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
2
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS245

 

 

Site Reference
CFS245
Site Address
Land north of Vanderbilt Avenue (Section C)
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
0.49
Potential Capacity (Housing)
17
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – too remote
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
2
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS246

 

 

Site Reference
CFS246
Site Address
Land north of Vanderbilt Avenue (Section A)
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
0.50
Potential Capacity (Housing)
17
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – too remote
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
2
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS247

 

 

Site Reference
CFS247
Site Address
Land east of Hooley Drive, Rayleigh (Section B)
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.55
Potential Capacity (Housing)
19
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS248

 

 

Site Reference
CFS248
Site Address
Land east of Hooley Drive, Rayleigh (Section A)
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.68
Potential Capacity (Housing)
24
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS249

 

 

Site Reference
CFS249
Site Address
Land east of Hooley Drive, Rayleigh (Section B)
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.32
Potential Capacity (Housing)
11
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS250

 

 

Site Reference
CFS250
Site Address
Land at Rayleigh Downs Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.46
Potential Capacity (Housing)
8
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
3
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS251

 

 

Site Reference
CFS251
Site Address
Land at Peartree Cottage, Holyoak Lane, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.34
Potential Capacity (Housing)
12
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✘
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
2
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
4
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS255

 

 

Site Reference
CFS255
Site Address
Land at North Side of Ironwell Lane, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.85
Potential Capacity (Housing)
30
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
4
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS256

 

 

Site Reference
CFS256
Site Address
Land north of Daws Heath Road and A127, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
2.98
Potential Capacity (Housing)
104
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
2
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS257

 

 

Site Reference
CFS257
Site Address
Land Adjacent to 130 Shoebury Road, Shoebury Road,
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
0.16
Potential Capacity (Housing)
5
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Proposed for exclusion – flood risk
Achievable?
✘
Deliverable?
Not Deliverable or Developable
Overall Flood Risk
2
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
4
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
2
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
2
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
3

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS258

 

 

Site Reference
CFS258
Site Address
Site at Little Wakering Road, Little Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
0.31
Potential Capacity (Housing)
11
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
3
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS259

 

 

Site Reference
CFS259
Site Address
Land at Homefield Farm, Greensward Lane, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
3.45
Potential Capacity (Housing)
121
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
2
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
2
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260A

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260A
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
7.84
Potential Capacity (Housing)
275
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260AA

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260AA
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
3.29
Potential Capacity (Housing)
108
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260AB

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260AB
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
6.43
Potential Capacity (Housing)
225
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260AC

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260AC
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
37.16
Potential Capacity (Housing)
1301
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
5
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260AD

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260AD
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
3.53
Potential Capacity (Housing)
75
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260AE

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260AE
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
9.17
Potential Capacity (Housing)
321
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260AF

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260AF
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
5.26
Potential Capacity (Housing)
184
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260AG

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260AG
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
5.28
Potential Capacity (Housing)
185
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260AH

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260AH
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
62.81
Potential Capacity (Housing)
2198
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
5
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260AI

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260AI
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
26.07
Potential Capacity (Housing)
594
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
1
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260AK

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260AK
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
1.61
Potential Capacity (Housing)
56
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
2
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260B

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260B
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
37.96
Potential Capacity (Housing)
1010
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
5
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260C

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260C
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
7.34
Potential Capacity (Housing)
286
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260D

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260D
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
8.18
Potential Capacity (Housing)
275
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260F

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260F
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
3.66
Potential Capacity (Housing)
128
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260G

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260G
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
4.08
Potential Capacity (Housing)
143
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
2
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260H

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260H
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
48.94
Potential Capacity (Housing)
1713
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
5
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260I

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260I
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
3.49
Potential Capacity (Housing)
122
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
1
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260J

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260J
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
3.34
Potential Capacity (Housing)
117
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260K

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260K
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
80.77
Potential Capacity (Housing)
2827
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
5
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260L

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260L
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
14.09
Potential Capacity (Housing)
493
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260M

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260M
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
7.91
Potential Capacity (Housing)
277
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260N

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260N
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
1.51
Potential Capacity (Housing)
53
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260O

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260O
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
5.99
Potential Capacity (Housing)
210
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
2
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260T

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260T
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
71.24
Potential Capacity (Housing)
2493
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
5
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260W

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260W
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
27.84
Potential Capacity (Housing)
868
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
2
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
1
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260X

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260X
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
28.65
Potential Capacity (Housing)
988
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
4
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
2
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260Y

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260Y
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
19.14
Potential Capacity (Housing)
670
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
2
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS260Z

 

 

Site Reference
CFS260Z
Site Address
Land North of Bournes Green Chase
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
37.63
Potential Capacity (Housing)
1317
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
5
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS261

 

 

Site Reference
CFS261
Site Address
Land east of Oxford Road, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
North of Southend
Site Size (Ha)
127.07
Potential Capacity (Housing)
4447
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2 or 3
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
2
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
1
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
1
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
5
Access to healthcare facilities
5
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
5
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS262

 

 

Site Reference
CFS262
Site Address
Land at Rawal Pindi Nurseries, Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.97
Potential Capacity (Housing)
34
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
3
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
4
Impact on Jobs
2
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
4
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
2
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
3

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS263

 

 

Site Reference
CFS263
Site Address
Land at Pulpits Farm, Greensward Lane, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
6.70
Potential Capacity (Housing)
180
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
2
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
2
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
2
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
1
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS264

 

 

Site Reference
CFS264
Site Address
Land at Greenacres Nursery, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.98
Potential Capacity (Housing)
30
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable (Subject to Policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
3
Landscape Impact
2
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
3
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
3
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
2
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
2

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: COL03

 

 

Site Reference
COL03
Site Address
Council Depot, South Street, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
1.56
Potential Capacity (Housing)
48
Available for Housing?
✘
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Not deliverable or developable
Overall Flood Risk
3
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
2
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
1
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
2
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
1
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
5
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
5
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: COL13

 

 

Site Reference
COL13
Site Address
Freight House, Bradley Way, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.15
Potential Capacity (Housing)
21
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Not deliverable or developable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
1
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
5
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: COL20

 

 

Site Reference
COL20
Site Address
Civic Suite Hockley Road Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.38
Potential Capacity (Housing)
19
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
2
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
1
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
4
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
5
Access to healthcare facilities
5
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: COL21

 

 

Site Reference
COL21
Site Address
Council Offices, South Street, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.55
Potential Capacity (Housing)
23
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
1
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
5
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
5
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: COL27

 

 

Site Reference
COL27
Site Address
Freight House Car Park, Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.47
Potential Capacity (Housing)
14
Available for Housing?
✘
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Not deliverable or developable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
2
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
5
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
5
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: COL7

 

 

Site Reference
COL7
Site Address
Mill Arts and Events Centre Bellingham Lane Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.40
Potential Capacity (Housing)
25
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
1
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
4
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
5
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: COL83

 

 

Site Reference
COL83
Site Address
Millview Meadows, Rochford (Part 1)
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.05
Potential Capacity (Housing)
10
Available for Housing?
✘
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Not deliverable or developable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
2
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
2
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: COL83

 

 

Site Reference
COL83
Site Address
Millview Meadows, Rochford (Part 2)
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
4.28
Potential Capacity (Housing)
70
Available for Housing?
✘
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Not deliverable or developable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
2
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
2
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
2
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
3
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
3
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
2
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: GF01

 

 

Site Reference
GF01
Site Address
Land North West of Station, Hockley
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.47
Potential Capacity (Housing)
13
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Developable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
2
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
5
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
3
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
3
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
3

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: REF01

 

 

Site Reference
REF01
Site Address
156 High Street Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.07
Potential Capacity (Housing)
6
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✘
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
2
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
1
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
3
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
4
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: REF02

 

 

Site Reference
REF02
Site Address
Site of 31 to 33 White Hart Lane Hawkwell
Settlement Cluster
Hockley & Hawkwell
Site Size (Ha)
0.25
Potential Capacity (Housing)
9
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✘
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
3
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
4
Access to train services
5
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
2
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
3
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
4

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: REF03

 

 

Site Reference
REF03
Site Address
Rear of 98 to 128 High Street, Rayleigh
Settlement Cluster
Rayleigh
Site Size (Ha)
0.34
Potential Capacity (Housing)
20
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✓
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
5
Impact on National Habitats
4
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
2
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
4
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
5
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
5
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
5
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: WD01

 

 

Site Reference
WD01
Site Address
61 High Street Great Wakering
Settlement Cluster
Great Wakering
Site Size (Ha)
0.06
Potential Capacity (Housing)
5
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✘
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
3
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
2
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
1
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
1
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
3
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
3
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: WD02

 

 

Site Reference
WD02
Site Address
66 North Street Rochford
Settlement Cluster
Rochford & Ashingdon
Site Size (Ha)
0.09
Potential Capacity (Housing)
7
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
5
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
4
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
5
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
4
Brownfield?
5
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
5
Access to bus services
5
Access to train services
5
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
4
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
4
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
4
Access to town centre
5
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
5

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: WD03

 

 

Site Reference
WD03
Site Address
Land Opp. 100 Winderemere Avenue Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
0.43
Potential Capacity (Housing)
15
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
Any
Achievable?
✓
Deliverable?
Deliverable
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
5
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
5
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
2
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
1
Access to walking infrastructure
5
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
2
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
3
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

SITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA: CFS265

 

 

Site Reference
CFS265
Site Address
Land at Sheepcotes Farm, Hullbridge
Settlement Cluster
Hullbridge
Site Size (Ha)
0.00
Potential Capacity (Housing)
0
Available for Housing?
✓
Available for Commercial/Employment?
✘
Potential Plan Strategy Option
2
Achievable?
✘
Deliverable?
Deliverable (subject to policy)
Overall Flood Risk
5
Critical Drainage Risk
2
Green Belt Harm
1
Landscape Impact
3
Impact on Ancient Woodland
5
Impact on International Habitats
3
Impact on National Habitats
5
Impact on Local Habitats
5
Impact on Protected Trees
2
Impact on safeguarded minerals
5
Impact on Agricultural Land
1
Proximity to Air Quality Management Area
5
Impact on Archaeology
3
Impact on Built Heritage
3
Proximity to Airport Safety Zone
5
Proximity to Pipelines
5
Proximity to Explosives Safeguarding
5
Proximity to Overhead Pylons
5
Proximity to Water Apparatus
5
Topography
5
Regeneration of Deprived Areas
3
Brownfield?
3
Impact on Jobs
3
Access to bus stop
4
Access to bus services
1
Access to train services
2
Access to walking infrastructure
3
Access to cycling infrastructure
3
Access to public rights of way
5
Distance to strategic road network
2
Existing site access
5
Access to primary school
4
Access to secondary school
1
Access to healthcare facilities
4
Access to open space
5
Access to town centre
1
Access to any centre
4
Access to employment site
1

All sites are scored on a scale from 1 (worst performing) and 5 (best performing). For a full understanding of the criteria used to appraise sites, please view the Site Appraisal Paper.

 

 

 

? then you just need to add min-height: 100px for your .leftcol and .rightcol classes

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.
back to top