New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Search representations
Results for Barling Magna Parish Council search
New searchObject
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Q65a. Do you agree with our vision for Sutton and Stonebridge? Is there anything you feel is missing? [Please state reasoning]
Representation ID: 42344
Received: 20/09/2021
Respondent: Barling Magna Parish Council
[Re Q65 a, b, c, d, e - Sutton and Stonebridge]
Map reference: CFS260T, CFS260L, CFS260F. Fields as you go west along Barrow Hall Road to the right. Green belt, agriculture land that should not be developed.
CFS260C. Footpath. Additional pollution - air quality for residents will be poorer.
CFS103. Old Mummery site - increased risk of surface water flooding on the junction of Barrow Hall Road and the brook, which currently regularly floods. Capacity of Mucking Brook should be assessed as the pressure on it will be increased if there is development.
CFS260K and CFS260B. Development would increase the risk of surface water flooding.
Development will destroy the individuality of the hamlets and it will mean the loss of trees which, with climate control concerns, we can ill afford, and means that much wildlife will perish and can never be recovered.
[Re Q65 a, b, c, d, e - Sutton and Stonebridge]
Map reference: CFS260T, CFS260L, CFS260F. Fields as you go west along Barrow Hall Road to the right. Green belt, agriculture land that should not be developed.
CFS260C. Footpath. Additional pollution - air quality for residents will be poorer.
CFS103. Old Mummery site - increased risk of surface water flooding on the junction of Barrow Hall Road and the brook, which currently regularly floods. Capacity of Mucking Brook should be assessed as the pressure on it will be increased if there is development.
CFS260K and CFS260B. Development would increase the risk of surface water flooding.
Development will destroy the individuality of the hamlets and it will mean the loss of trees which, with climate control concerns, we can ill afford, and means that much wildlife will perish and can never be recovered.
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Q65b. With reference to Figure 53 and your preferred Strategy Option, do you think any of the land edged blue should be made available for any of the following uses?
Representation ID: 42345
Received: 20/09/2021
Respondent: Barling Magna Parish Council
[Re Q65 a, b, c, d, e - Sutton and Stonebridge]
Map reference: CFS260T, CFS260L, CFS260F. Fields as you go west along Barrow Hall Road to the right. Green belt, agriculture land that should not be developed.
CFS260C. Footpath. Additional pollution - air quality for residents will be poorer.
CFS103. Old Mummery site - increased risk of surface water flooding on the junction of Barrow Hall Road and the brook, which currently regularly floods. Capacity of Mucking Brook should be assessed as the pressure on it will be increased if there is development.
CFS260K and CFS260B. Development would increase the risk of surface water flooding.
Development will destroy the individuality of the hamlets and it will mean the loss of trees which, with climate control concerns, we can ill afford, and means that much wildlife will perish and can never be recovered.
[Re Q65 a, b, c, d, e - Sutton and Stonebridge]
Map reference: CFS260T, CFS260L, CFS260F. Fields as you go west along Barrow Hall Road to the right. Green belt, agriculture land that should not be developed.
CFS260C. Footpath. Additional pollution - air quality for residents will be poorer.
CFS103. Old Mummery site - increased risk of surface water flooding on the junction of Barrow Hall Road and the brook, which currently regularly floods. Capacity of Mucking Brook should be assessed as the pressure on it will be increased if there is development.
CFS260K and CFS260B. Development would increase the risk of surface water flooding.
Development will destroy the individuality of the hamlets and it will mean the loss of trees which, with climate control concerns, we can ill afford, and means that much wildlife will perish and can never be recovered.
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Q65c. Are there areas in Sutton and Stonebridge that development should generally be presumed appropriate? Why these areas? [Please state reasoning]
Representation ID: 42346
Received: 20/09/2021
Respondent: Barling Magna Parish Council
[Re Q65 a, b, c, d, e - Sutton and Stonebridge]
Map reference: CFS260T, CFS260L, CFS260F. Fields as you go west along Barrow Hall Road to the right. Green belt, agriculture land that should not be developed.
CFS260C. Footpath. Additional pollution - air quality for residents will be poorer.
CFS103. Old Mummery site - increased risk of surface water flooding on the junction of Barrow Hall Road and the brook, which currently regularly floods. Capacity of Mucking Brook should be assessed as the pressure on it will be increased if there is development.
CFS260K and CFS260B. Development would increase the risk of surface water flooding.
Development will destroy the individuality of the hamlets and it will mean the loss of trees which, with climate control concerns, we can ill afford, and means that much wildlife will perish and can never be recovered.
[Re Q65 a, b, c, d, e - Sutton and Stonebridge]
Map reference: CFS260T, CFS260L, CFS260F. Fields as you go west along Barrow Hall Road to the right. Green belt, agriculture land that should not be developed.
CFS260C. Footpath. Additional pollution - air quality for residents will be poorer.
CFS103. Old Mummery site - increased risk of surface water flooding on the junction of Barrow Hall Road and the brook, which currently regularly floods. Capacity of Mucking Brook should be assessed as the pressure on it will be increased if there is development.
CFS260K and CFS260B. Development would increase the risk of surface water flooding.
Development will destroy the individuality of the hamlets and it will mean the loss of trees which, with climate control concerns, we can ill afford, and means that much wildlife will perish and can never be recovered.
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Q65d. Are there areas that require protecting from development? Why these areas? [Please state reasoning]
Representation ID: 42347
Received: 20/09/2021
Respondent: Barling Magna Parish Council
[Re Q65 a, b, c, d, e - Sutton and Stonebridge]
Map reference: CFS260T, CFS260L, CFS260F. Fields as you go west along Barrow Hall Road to the right. Green belt, agriculture land that should not be developed.
CFS260C. Footpath. Additional pollution - air quality for residents will be poorer.
CFS103. Old Mummery site - increased risk of surface water flooding on the junction of Barrow Hall Road and the brook, which currently regularly floods. Capacity of Mucking Brook should be assessed as the pressure on it will be increased if there is development.
CFS260K and CFS260B. Development would increase the risk of surface water flooding.
Development will destroy the individuality of the hamlets and it will mean the loss of trees which, with climate control concerns, we can ill afford, and means that much wildlife will perish and can never be recovered.
[Re Q65 a, b, c, d, e - Sutton and Stonebridge]
Map reference: CFS260T, CFS260L, CFS260F. Fields as you go west along Barrow Hall Road to the right. Green belt, agriculture land that should not be developed.
CFS260C. Footpath. Additional pollution - air quality for residents will be poorer.
CFS103. Old Mummery site - increased risk of surface water flooding on the junction of Barrow Hall Road and the brook, which currently regularly floods. Capacity of Mucking Brook should be assessed as the pressure on it will be increased if there is development.
CFS260K and CFS260B. Development would increase the risk of surface water flooding.
Development will destroy the individuality of the hamlets and it will mean the loss of trees which, with climate control concerns, we can ill afford, and means that much wildlife will perish and can never be recovered.
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Q65e. Do you agree that the local green spaces shown on Figure 53 hold local significance? Are there any other open spaces that hold particular local significance? [Please state reasoning]
Representation ID: 42348
Received: 20/09/2021
Respondent: Barling Magna Parish Council
[Re Q65 a, b, c, d, e - Sutton and Stonebridge]
Map reference: CFS260T, CFS260L, CFS260F. Fields as you go west along Barrow Hall Road to the right. Green belt, agriculture land that should not be developed.
CFS260C. Footpath. Additional pollution - air quality for residents will be poorer.
CFS103. Old Mummery site - increased risk of surface water flooding on the junction of Barrow Hall Road and the brook, which currently regularly floods. Capacity of Mucking Brook should be assessed as the pressure on it will be increased if there is development.
CFS260K and CFS260B. Development would increase the risk of surface water flooding.
Development will destroy the individuality of the hamlets and it will mean the loss of trees which, with climate control concerns, we can ill afford, and means that much wildlife will perish and can never be recovered.
[Re Q65 a, b, c, d, e - Sutton and Stonebridge]
Map reference: CFS260T, CFS260L, CFS260F. Fields as you go west along Barrow Hall Road to the right. Green belt, agriculture land that should not be developed.
CFS260C. Footpath. Additional pollution - air quality for residents will be poorer.
CFS103. Old Mummery site - increased risk of surface water flooding on the junction of Barrow Hall Road and the brook, which currently regularly floods. Capacity of Mucking Brook should be assessed as the pressure on it will be increased if there is development.
CFS260K and CFS260B. Development would increase the risk of surface water flooding.
Development will destroy the individuality of the hamlets and it will mean the loss of trees which, with climate control concerns, we can ill afford, and means that much wildlife will perish and can never be recovered.
