Issues and Options Document

REF: CFS166 - Paglesham Church End

Point SP 1.1: (Objectively Assessed Need) We have a real and identified need for affordable homes in the district and an ageing population, so how do we sustainably meet our need for market and affordable homes, and homes for older people and adults with disabilities over the next 20 years?

Rochford District Council should provide their housing in the district at the level set by the Objectively Assessed Need of between 331 to 361 houses per annum. Rochford Council should not rely on neighbouring authorities Duty to Cooperate as these authorities are also under pressure to supply housing. Neighbouring authorities may also be looking to share their requirement with Rochford Council providing the shortfall. The authority should ensure they have a supply to meet the requirements, going further than the proposed option A. 'Seek to provide as much of the district's housing need within our area, as far as possible, given environmental and other constraints. The council must consider releasing more land from the Green Belt, as detailed in the response to Point SP 5.1 below.

Point SP 1.3: How do we plan to facilitate the delivery of our need for new homes over the next 20 years within the district?

Additional land should be included in the local plan for future residential development to meet the target of supplying the minimum 331 houses per annum. For this reason Option C. Several Small extensions to the existing area would be the best way to achieve the minimum of 331 houses per annum in the Rochford District. As detailed in the site SHLAA summary the site is located close to existing residential area so be considered a small extension to the existing area.

Point SP 2.2: How do we continue to support local facilities in our village and neighbourhood centres?

The development would support the village services of the public houses. The site be within 30m of one public house showing easy access.

'Core Strategy policy RTC3 seeks to protect retail uses within residential areas and will only permit the loss of such retail uses where it has been clearly demonstrated that a retail use in the location is not viable and that the proposed alternative use will still offer a service to the local community that meets day-to-day needs.'

The development of the site would further increase the demand and support the need for the services provided in Paglesham improving the sustainability of these services.

Given the above, option A. should be adopted to retain the existing Core Strategy policy.

Point SP 5.1: How do we balance protection of the district's Green Belt that the meets the five Green Belt purposes, against the need to deliver new homes and jobs across the district and the wider South Essex area?

The principle of the Green Belt is to keep a sense of openness between built up areas. The development of the Green Belt should only happen in exceptional circumstances, but as reiterated by Government publications the plan-led system should review the existing Green Belt boundary to ensure development is always sustainable.
The Five purposes of the Green Belt are:
1. To check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas;
2. To prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another;
3. To assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment;
4. To preserve the setting and special character of historic towns; and
5. To assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.
The Council's approach to the Green Belt is set out in the Core Strategy adopted in December 2011. The four objectives of the Core Strategy for the Green Belt are;
1. Continue to protect the openness and character of the District's Green Belt.
2. Ensure the minimum amount of Green Belt is allocated to meet the District's housing and employment needs, and that extensions to the residential envelope are in sustainable locations, which retain the individual identities of settlements and prevent coalescence
3. Ensure existing lawful businesses in the Green Belt are able to continue to function and contribute to the local economy, as appropriate, having regard to the impact on the openness and character of the Green Belt.
4. Ensure appropriate forms of diversification are encouraged to support the local rural economy and help achieve the vision of developing green tourism in the District.
Given the above, the land in the Strategic Housing Land Assessment referred to above should be considered as it meets the requirements for new housing as set out in points one and two above. There should also be an amendment to the current policy to release sustainable sites like the above from the Green Belt easier and hence the support for option B to amend the current Green Belt policy in the Core Strategy.

REF: CFS166 - Paglesham Church End

Point SP 1.1: (Objectively Assessed Need) We have a real and identified need for affordable homes in the district and an ageing population, so how do we sustainably meet our need for market and affordable homes, and homes for older people and adults with disabilities over the next 20 years?

Rochford District Council should provide their housing in the district at the level set by the Objectively Assessed Need of between 331 to 361 houses per annum. Rochford Council should not rely on neighbouring authorities Duty to Cooperate as these authorities are also under pressure to supply housing. Neighbouring authorities may also be looking to share their requirement with Rochford Council providing the shortfall. The authority should ensure they have a supply to meet the requirements, going further than the proposed option A. 'Seek to provide as much of the district's housing need within our area, as far as possible, given environmental and other constraints. The council must consider releasing more land from the Green Belt, as detailed in the response to Point SP 5.1 below.

Point SP 1.3: How do we plan to facilitate the delivery of our need for new homes over the next 20 years within the district?

Additional land should be included in the local plan for future residential development to meet the target of supplying the minimum 331 houses per annum. For this reason Option C. Several Small extensions to the existing area would be the best way to achieve the minimum of 331 houses per annum in the Rochford District. As detailed in the site SHLAA summary the site is located close to existing residential area so be considered a small extension to the existing area.

Point SP 2.2: How do we continue to support local facilities in our village and neighbourhood centres?

The development would support the village services of the public houses. The site be within 30m of one public house showing easy access.

'Core Strategy policy RTC3 seeks to protect retail uses within residential areas and will only permit the loss of such retail uses where it has been clearly demonstrated that a retail use in the location is not viable and that the proposed alternative use will still offer a service to the local community that meets day-to-day needs.'

The development of the site would further increase the demand and support the need for the services provided in Paglesham improving the sustainability of these services.

Given the above, option A. should be adopted to retain the existing Core Strategy policy.

Point SP 5.1: How do we balance protection of the district's Green Belt that the meets the five Green Belt purposes, against the need to deliver new homes and jobs across the district and the wider South Essex area?

The principle of the Green Belt is to keep a sense of openness between built up areas. The development of the Green Belt should only happen in exceptional circumstances, but as reiterated by Government publications the plan-led system should review the existing Green Belt boundary to ensure development is always sustainable.
The Five purposes of the Green Belt are:
1. To check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas;
2. To prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another;
3. To assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment;
4. To preserve the setting and special character of historic towns; and
5. To assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.
The Council's approach to the Green Belt is set out in the Core Strategy adopted in December 2011. The four objectives of the Core Strategy for the Green Belt are;
1. Continue to protect the openness and character of the District's Green Belt.
2. Ensure the minimum amount of Green Belt is allocated to meet the District's housing and employment needs, and that extensions to the residential envelope are in sustainable locations, which retain the individual identities of settlements and prevent coalescence
3. Ensure existing lawful businesses in the Green Belt are able to continue to function and contribute to the local economy, as appropriate, having regard to the impact on the openness and character of the Green Belt.
4. Ensure appropriate forms of diversification are encouraged to support the local rural economy and help achieve the vision of developing green tourism in the District.
Given the above, the land in the Strategic Housing Land Assessment referred to above should be considered as it meets the requirements for new housing as set out in points one and two above. There should also be an amendment to the current policy to release sustainable sites like the above from the Green Belt easier and hence the support for option B to amend the current Green Belt policy in the Core Strategy.

REF: CFS166 - Paglesham Church End

Point SP 1.1: (Objectively Assessed Need) We have a real and identified need for affordable homes in the district and an ageing population, so how do we sustainably meet our need for market and affordable homes, and homes for older people and adults with disabilities over the next 20 years?

Rochford District Council should provide their housing in the district at the level set by the Objectively Assessed Need of between 331 to 361 houses per annum. Rochford Council should not rely on neighbouring authorities Duty to Cooperate as these authorities are also under pressure to supply housing. Neighbouring authorities may also be looking to share their requirement with Rochford Council providing the shortfall. The authority should ensure they have a supply to meet the requirements, going further than the proposed option A. 'Seek to provide as much of the district's housing need within our area, as far as possible, given environmental and other constraints. The council must consider releasing more land from the Green Belt, as detailed in the response to Point SP 5.1 below.

Point SP 1.3: How do we plan to facilitate the delivery of our need for new homes over the next 20 years within the district?

Additional land should be included in the local plan for future residential development to meet the target of supplying the minimum 331 houses per annum. For this reason Option C. Several Small extensions to the existing area would be the best way to achieve the minimum of 331 houses per annum in the Rochford District. As detailed in the site SHLAA summary the site is located close to existing residential area so be considered a small extension to the existing area.

Point SP 2.2: How do we continue to support local facilities in our village and neighbourhood centres?

The development would support the village services of the public houses. The site be within 30m of one public house showing easy access.

'Core Strategy policy RTC3 seeks to protect retail uses within residential areas and will only permit the loss of such retail uses where it has been clearly demonstrated that a retail use in the location is not viable and that the proposed alternative use will still offer a service to the local community that meets day-to-day needs.'

The development of the site would further increase the demand and support the need for the services provided in Paglesham improving the sustainability of these services.

Given the above, option A. should be adopted to retain the existing Core Strategy policy.

Point SP 5.1: How do we balance protection of the district's Green Belt that the meets the five Green Belt purposes, against the need to deliver new homes and jobs across the district and the wider South Essex area?

The principle of the Green Belt is to keep a sense of openness between built up areas. The development of the Green Belt should only happen in exceptional circumstances, but as reiterated by Government publications the plan-led system should review the existing Green Belt boundary to ensure development is always sustainable.
The Five purposes of the Green Belt are:
1. To check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas;
2. To prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another;
3. To assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment;
4. To preserve the setting and special character of historic towns; and
5. To assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.
The Council's approach to the Green Belt is set out in the Core Strategy adopted in December 2011. The four objectives of the Core Strategy for the Green Belt are;
1. Continue to protect the openness and character of the District's Green Belt.
2. Ensure the minimum amount of Green Belt is allocated to meet the District's housing and employment needs, and that extensions to the residential envelope are in sustainable locations, which retain the individual identities of settlements and prevent coalescence
3. Ensure existing lawful businesses in the Green Belt are able to continue to function and contribute to the local economy, as appropriate, having regard to the impact on the openness and character of the Green Belt.
4. Ensure appropriate forms of diversification are encouraged to support the local rural economy and help achieve the vision of developing green tourism in the District.
Given the above, the land in the Strategic Housing Land Assessment referred to above should be considered as it meets the requirements for new housing as set out in points one and two above. There should also be an amendment to the current policy to release sustainable sites like the above from the Green Belt easier and hence the support for option B to amend the current Green Belt policy in the Core Strategy.

*THIS REPRESENTATION HAS AN ATTACHMENT*

Dear Sir/Madam

RE: Rochford District Local Plan - Issues and Options Consultations (13 December 2017 - 7 March 2018) - land west of Long Lane, south-east Hullbridge

We are promoting residential development at land west of Long Lane, south-east Hullbridge; a sustainable site that would assist Rochford in meeting its housing needs.

This 23.4Ha site is located to the south-east of Hullbridge and has the scope to yield c.600 residential dwellings of mix-tenure.

Attached with this letter is the Promotional Document that seeks to demonstrate the deliverability and suitability of the site. We would be grateful if you could acknowledge the receipt of this representation.

RE: Land to the west of Little Wakering Road and east of Cramps Farm Little Wakering

Point SP 1.1 (Objectively Assessed Need.) We have a real and identified for affordable homes in the district and an ageing population, so how do we sustainably meet our need for market and affordable homes, and homes for older people and adults with disabilities over the next 20 years?

Response: Rochford District Council is required to provide between 331 to 361 houses per annum set out in the Objectively Assessed Need of. Rochford Council should not rely on neighbouring authorities Duty to Cooperate as these areas are similarly under pressure to supply housing. Rochford District Council must provide this supply going further than the proposed option A. 'Seek to provide as much of the district's housing need within our area, as far as possible, given environmental and other constraints.' The council must consider releasing more land from the Green Belt such as that explained above, and as detailed in the response to Point SP 5.1 below.

Point SP 1.3: How do we plan to facilitate the delivery of our need for new homes over the next 20 years within the district?

Response:

The Local Plan should incorporate additional land for development to achieve the obligation of delivering at least 331 houses per annum. For this reason option C. several small extensions to the existing area would be one good way to achieve the minimum housing requirements in the Rochford District. The land is surrounded by residential development and so would be considered a small extension to the settlement.

Point SP 2.2: How do we continue to support local facilities in our villages and neighbourhood centres?

The development would support the village services including shops and public houses. The site is within 800m to these services presenting easy access to these.

'Core Strategy policy RTC3 seeks to protect retail uses within residential areas and will only permit the loss of such retail uses where it has been clearly demonstrated that a retail use in the location is not viable and that the proposed alternative use will still offer a service to the local community that meets day-to-day needs.'

The development of the site would further increase the demand and support the need for the village services in Little Wakering improving the sustainability of these services.

Option A. to retain the existing Core Strategy policy should be adopted.

Point SP 5.1: How do we balance protection of the district's Green Belt that meets the five Green Belt purposes, against the need to deliver new homes and jobs across the district, and the wider South Essex area?

Response: The principle of the Green Belt is to keep a sense of openness between built up areas. The development of the Green Belt should only happen in exceptional circumstances, but as reiterated by government publications the plan-led system should review the existing Green Belt boundary to ensure development is always sustainable.

The five purposes of the Green Belt are:
1. to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas
2. to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another
3. to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment
4. to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns, and
5. to assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.

The Councils approach to the Green Belt is set out in the Core Strategy adopted in December 2011. The four objectives of the Core Strategy for the Green Belt are:

1. Continue to protect the openness and character of the District's Green Belt
2. Ensure the minimum amount of Green Belt is allocated to meet the District's housing and employment needs, and that extensions to the residential envelope are in sustainable locations, which retain the individual identifies of settlements and prevent coalescence
3. Ensure existing lawful businesses in the Green Belt are able to continue to function and contribute to the local economy, as appropriate, having regard to the impact on the openness and character of the Green Belt
4. Ensure appropriate forms of diversification are encouraged to support the local rural economy and help achieve the vision of development green tourism in the District.

The above land should be included in the local plan for residential development given the above points and requirements and one and two. There should also be an amendment to the current policy to release sustainable sites including this land from the Green Belt and hence the support for option B. to amend the current Green Belt policy in the Core Strategy.

RE: Land to the west of Little Wakering Road and east of Cramps Farm Little Wakering

Point SP 1.1 (Objectively Assessed Need.) We have a real and identified for affordable homes in the district and an ageing population, so how do we sustainably meet our need for market and affordable homes, and homes for older people and adults with disabilities over the next 20 years?

Response: Rochford District Council is required to provide between 331 to 361 houses per annum set out in the Objectively Assessed Need of. Rochford Council should not rely on neighbouring authorities Duty to Cooperate as these areas are similarly under pressure to supply housing. Rochford District Council must provide this supply going further than the proposed option A. 'Seek to provide as much of the district's housing need within our area, as far as possible, given environmental and other constraints.' The council must consider releasing more land from the Green Belt such as that explained above, and as detailed in the response to Point SP 5.1 below.

Point SP 1.3: How do we plan to facilitate the delivery of our need for new homes over the next 20 years within the district?

Response:

The Local Plan should incorporate additional land for development to achieve the obligation of delivering at least 331 houses per annum. For this reason option C. several small extensions to the existing area would be one good way to achieve the minimum housing requirements in the Rochford District. The land is surrounded by residential development and so would be considered a small extension to the settlement.

Point SP 2.2: How do we continue to support local facilities in our villages and neighbourhood centres?

The development would support the village services including shops and public houses. The site is within 800m to these services presenting easy access to these.

'Core Strategy policy RTC3 seeks to protect retail uses within residential areas and will only permit the loss of such retail uses where it has been clearly demonstrated that a retail use in the location is not viable and that the proposed alternative use will still offer a service to the local community that meets day-to-day needs.'

The development of the site would further increase the demand and support the need for the village services in Little Wakering improving the sustainability of these services.

Option A. to retain the existing Core Strategy policy should be adopted.

Point SP 5.1: How do we balance protection of the district's Green Belt that meets the five Green Belt purposes, against the need to deliver new homes and jobs across the district, and the wider South Essex area?

Response: The principle of the Green Belt is to keep a sense of openness between built up areas. The development of the Green Belt should only happen in exceptional circumstances, but as reiterated by government publications the plan-led system should review the existing Green Belt boundary to ensure development is always sustainable.

The five purposes of the Green Belt are:
1. to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas
2. to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another
3. to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment
4. to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns, and
5. to assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.

The Councils approach to the Green Belt is set out in the Core Strategy adopted in December 2011. The four objectives of the Core Strategy for the Green Belt are:

1. Continue to protect the openness and character of the District's Green Belt
2. Ensure the minimum amount of Green Belt is allocated to meet the District's housing and employment needs, and that extensions to the residential envelope are in sustainable locations, which retain the individual identifies of settlements and prevent coalescence
3. Ensure existing lawful businesses in the Green Belt are able to continue to function and contribute to the local economy, as appropriate, having regard to the impact on the openness and character of the Green Belt
4. Ensure appropriate forms of diversification are encouraged to support the local rural economy and help achieve the vision of development green tourism in the District.

The above land should be included in the local plan for residential development given the above points and requirements and one and two. There should also be an amendment to the current policy to release sustainable sites including this land from the Green Belt and hence the support for option B. to amend the current Green Belt policy in the Core Strategy.

RE: Land to the west of Little Wakering Road and east of Cramps Farm Little Wakering

Point SP 1.1 (Objectively Assessed Need.) We have a real and identified for affordable homes in the district and an ageing population, so how do we sustainably meet our need for market and affordable homes, and homes for older people and adults with disabilities over the next 20 years?

Response: Rochford District Council is required to provide between 331 to 361 houses per annum set out in the Objectively Assessed Need of. Rochford Council should not rely on neighbouring authorities Duty to Cooperate as these areas are similarly under pressure to supply housing. Rochford District Council must provide this supply going further than the proposed option A. 'Seek to provide as much of the district's housing need within our area, as far as possible, given environmental and other constraints.' The council must consider releasing more land from the Green Belt such as that explained above, and as detailed in the response to Point SP 5.1 below.

Point SP 1.3: How do we plan to facilitate the delivery of our need for new homes over the next 20 years within the district?

Response:

The Local Plan should incorporate additional land for development to achieve the obligation of delivering at least 331 houses per annum. For this reason option C. several small extensions to the existing area would be one good way to achieve the minimum housing requirements in the Rochford District. The land is surrounded by residential development and so would be considered a small extension to the settlement.

Point SP 2.2: How do we continue to support local facilities in our villages and neighbourhood centres?

The development would support the village services including shops and public houses. The site is within 800m to these services presenting easy access to these.

'Core Strategy policy RTC3 seeks to protect retail uses within residential areas and will only permit the loss of such retail uses where it has been clearly demonstrated that a retail use in the location is not viable and that the proposed alternative use will still offer a service to the local community that meets day-to-day needs.'

The development of the site would further increase the demand and support the need for the village services in Little Wakering improving the sustainability of these services.

Option A. to retain the existing Core Strategy policy should be adopted.

Point SP 5.1: How do we balance protection of the district's Green Belt that meets the five Green Belt purposes, against the need to deliver new homes and jobs across the district, and the wider South Essex area?

Response: The principle of the Green Belt is to keep a sense of openness between built up areas. The development of the Green Belt should only happen in exceptional circumstances, but as reiterated by government publications the plan-led system should review the existing Green Belt boundary to ensure development is always sustainable.

The five purposes of the Green Belt are:
1. to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas
2. to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another
3. to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment
4. to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns, and
5. to assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.

The Councils approach to the Green Belt is set out in the Core Strategy adopted in December 2011. The four objectives of the Core Strategy for the Green Belt are:

1. Continue to protect the openness and character of the District's Green Belt
2. Ensure the minimum amount of Green Belt is allocated to meet the District's housing and employment needs, and that extensions to the residential envelope are in sustainable locations, which retain the individual identifies of settlements and prevent coalescence
3. Ensure existing lawful businesses in the Green Belt are able to continue to function and contribute to the local economy, as appropriate, having regard to the impact on the openness and character of the Green Belt
4. Ensure appropriate forms of diversification are encouraged to support the local rural economy and help achieve the vision of development green tourism in the District.

The above land should be included in the local plan for residential development given the above points and requirements and one and two. There should also be an amendment to the current policy to release sustainable sites including this land from the Green Belt and hence the support for option B. to amend the current Green Belt policy in the Core Strategy.

RE: Land to the west of Little Wakering Road and east of Cramps Farm Little Wakering

Point SP 1.1 (Objectively Assessed Need.) We have a real and identified for affordable homes in the district and an ageing population, so how do we sustainably meet our need for market and affordable homes, and homes for older people and adults with disabilities over the next 20 years?

Response: Rochford District Council is required to provide between 331 to 361 houses per annum set out in the Objectively Assessed Need of. Rochford Council should not rely on neighbouring authorities Duty to Cooperate as these areas are similarly under pressure to supply housing. Rochford District Council must provide this supply going further than the proposed option A. 'Seek to provide as much of the district's housing need within our area, as far as possible, given environmental and other constraints.' The council must consider releasing more land from the Green Belt such as that explained above, and as detailed in the response to Point SP 5.1 below.

Point SP 1.3: How do we plan to facilitate the delivery of our need for new homes over the next 20 years within the district?

Response:

The Local Plan should incorporate additional land for development to achieve the obligation of delivering at least 331 houses per annum. For this reason option C. several small extensions to the existing area would be one good way to achieve the minimum housing requirements in the Rochford District. The land is surrounded by residential development and so would be considered a small extension to the settlement.

Point SP 2.2: How do we continue to support local facilities in our villages and neighbourhood centres?

The development would support the village services including shops and public houses. The site is within 800m to these services presenting easy access to these.

'Core Strategy policy RTC3 seeks to protect retail uses within residential areas and will only permit the loss of such retail uses where it has been clearly demonstrated that a retail use in the location is not viable and that the proposed alternative use will still offer a service to the local community that meets day-to-day needs.'

The development of the site would further increase the demand and support the need for the village services in Little Wakering improving the sustainability of these services.

Option A. to retain the existing Core Strategy policy should be adopted.

Point SP 5.1: How do we balance protection of the district's Green Belt that meets the five Green Belt purposes, against the need to deliver new homes and jobs across the district, and the wider South Essex area?

Response: The principle of the Green Belt is to keep a sense of openness between built up areas. The development of the Green Belt should only happen in exceptional circumstances, but as reiterated by government publications the plan-led system should review the existing Green Belt boundary to ensure development is always sustainable.

The five purposes of the Green Belt are:
1. to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas
2. to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another
3. to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment
4. to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns, and
5. to assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.

The Councils approach to the Green Belt is set out in the Core Strategy adopted in December 2011. The four objectives of the Core Strategy for the Green Belt are:

1. Continue to protect the openness and character of the District's Green Belt
2. Ensure the minimum amount of Green Belt is allocated to meet the District's housing and employment needs, and that extensions to the residential envelope are in sustainable locations, which retain the individual identifies of settlements and prevent coalescence
3. Ensure existing lawful businesses in the Green Belt are able to continue to function and contribute to the local economy, as appropriate, having regard to the impact on the openness and character of the Green Belt
4. Ensure appropriate forms of diversification are encouraged to support the local rural economy and help achieve the vision of development green tourism in the District.

The above land should be included in the local plan for residential development given the above points and requirements and one and two. There should also be an amendment to the current policy to release sustainable sites including this land from the Green Belt and hence the support for option B. to amend the current Green Belt policy in the Core Strategy.

REF: CFS121 - Land north of A127 Rayleigh

Point SP 1.1 (Objectively Assessed Need.) We have a real and identified need for affordable homes in the district and an ageing population, so how do we sustainably meet our need for market and affordable homes, and homes for older people and adults with disabilities over the next 20 years?

Response:

Rochford District Council must provide between 331 to 361 houses per annum in the district as required for by the Objectively Assessed Need. Rochford Council should not rely on neighbouring authorities Duty to Cooperate as these authorities are similarly under pressure to supply housing. The authority should ensure they have a supply to meet the requirements, going further than the proposed option A. 'Seek to provide as much of the district's housing need within our area, as far as possible, given environmental and other constraints.' The council must consider releasing more land from the Green Belt, as detailed in the response to Point SP 5.1 below.

Point SP 1.3. How do we plan to facilitate the delivery of our need for new homes over the next 20 years within the district?

Response:

The above land should be included in the local plan for future residential development to meet the condition to supply at least 331 houses per annum. For this reason option C. Several small extensions to the existing area would be one good way to achieve the minimum of 331 houses per annum in the Rochford District. As detailed in the site SHLAA summary the site is located close to the existing residential area and be considered a small extension to the existing area.

Point SP 2.2: How do we continue to support local facilities in our village and neighbourhood centres?

The development would support the neighbourhood centre of Rayleigh.

'Core Strategy policy RTC3 seeks to protect retail uses within residential areas and will only permit the loss of such retail uses where it has been clearly demonstrated that a retail use in the location is not viable and that the proposed alternative use will still offer a service to the local community that meets day-to-day needs.'

The development of the site would further increase the demand and support the need for services provided in Rayleigh thus improving the sustainability of these services.

Given the above option A. to retain the existing Core Strategy policy should be adopted.

Point SP 5.1. How do we balance protection of the district's Green Belt that meets the five Green Belt purposes, against the need to deliver new homes and jobs across the district, and the wider South Essex area?

Response:

The principle of the Green Belt is to keep a sense of openness between built up areas. The development of the Green Belt should only happen in exceptional circumstances, but as reiterated by Government publications the plan-led system should review the existing Green Belt boundary to guarantee development is always sustainable.

The Five purposes of the Green Belt are:
1. to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas;
2. to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another;
3. to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment;
4. to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns; and
5. to assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.

The Councils approach to the Green Belt is set out in the Core Strategy adopted in December 2011. The four objectives of the Core Strategy for the Green Belt are
1. Continue to protect the openness and character of the District's Green Belt.
2. Ensure the minimum amount of Green Belt is allocated to meet the District's housing and employment needs, and that extensions to the residential envelope are in sustainable locations, which retain the individual identities of settlements and prevent coalescence.
3. Ensure existing lawful business in the Green Belt are able to continue to function and contribute to the local economy, as appropriate, having regarding to the impact on the openness and character of the Green Belt.
4. Ensure appropriate forms of diversification are encouraged to support the local rural economy and help achieve the vision of developing green tourism in the District.

The above land referred to in the Strategic Housing Land Assessment should be considered for development. The land meets the requirements for new housing as set out in points one and two above. The current policy should be amended to release sustainable sites like the above from the Green Belt and hence the support for option B. to amend the current Green Belt policy in the Core Strategy.

REF: CFS121 - Land north of A127 Rayleigh

Point SP 1.1 (Objectively Assessed Need.) We have a real and identified need for affordable homes in the district and an ageing population, so how do we sustainably meet our need for market and affordable homes, and homes for older people and adults with disabilities over the next 20 years?

Response:

Rochford District Council must provide between 331 to 361 houses per annum in the district as required for by the Objectively Assessed Need. Rochford Council should not rely on neighbouring authorities Duty to Cooperate as these authorities are similarly under pressure to supply housing. The authority should ensure they have a supply to meet the requirements, going further than the proposed option A. 'Seek to provide as much of the district's housing need within our area, as far as possible, given environmental and other constraints.' The council must consider releasing more land from the Green Belt, as detailed in the response to Point SP 5.1 below.

Point SP 1.3. How do we plan to facilitate the delivery of our need for new homes over the next 20 years within the district?

Response:

The above land should be included in the local plan for future residential development to meet the condition to supply at least 331 houses per annum. For this reason option C. Several small extensions to the existing area would be one good way to achieve the minimum of 331 houses per annum in the Rochford District. As detailed in the site SHLAA summary the site is located close to the existing residential area and be considered a small extension to the existing area.

Point SP 2.2: How do we continue to support local facilities in our village and neighbourhood centres?

The development would support the neighbourhood centre of Rayleigh.

'Core Strategy policy RTC3 seeks to protect retail uses within residential areas and will only permit the loss of such retail uses where it has been clearly demonstrated that a retail use in the location is not viable and that the proposed alternative use will still offer a service to the local community that meets day-to-day needs.'

The development of the site would further increase the demand and support the need for services provided in Rayleigh thus improving the sustainability of these services.

Given the above option A. to retain the existing Core Strategy policy should be adopted.

Point SP 5.1. How do we balance protection of the district's Green Belt that meets the five Green Belt purposes, against the need to deliver new homes and jobs across the district, and the wider South Essex area?

Response:

The principle of the Green Belt is to keep a sense of openness between built up areas. The development of the Green Belt should only happen in exceptional circumstances, but as reiterated by Government publications the plan-led system should review the existing Green Belt boundary to guarantee development is always sustainable.

The Five purposes of the Green Belt are:
1. to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas;
2. to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another;
3. to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment;
4. to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns; and
5. to assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.

The Councils approach to the Green Belt is set out in the Core Strategy adopted in December 2011. The four objectives of the Core Strategy for the Green Belt are
1. Continue to protect the openness and character of the District's Green Belt.
2. Ensure the minimum amount of Green Belt is allocated to meet the District's housing and employment needs, and that extensions to the residential envelope are in sustainable locations, which retain the individual identities of settlements and prevent coalescence.
3. Ensure existing lawful business in the Green Belt are able to continue to function and contribute to the local economy, as appropriate, having regarding to the impact on the openness and character of the Green Belt.
4. Ensure appropriate forms of diversification are encouraged to support the local rural economy and help achieve the vision of developing green tourism in the District.

The above land referred to in the Strategic Housing Land Assessment should be considered for development. The land meets the requirements for new housing as set out in points one and two above. The current policy should be amended to release sustainable sites like the above from the Green Belt and hence the support for option B. to amend the current Green Belt policy in the Core Strategy.