Issues and Options Document

Search representations

Results for Woodland Trust search

New search New search

Object

Issues and Options Document

C. Retain our current policy on trees and woodlands

Representation ID: 35502

Received: 07/03/2018

Respondent: Woodland Trust

Representation Summary:

We would like to see the ancient woodland protection in Policy DM25 strengthened in line with Government proposals for revision of the NPPF. We support your commitment to woodland creation in Policy DM25 and suggest you could consider use of our Woodland Access Standard to calculate how much new woodland is needed in the district.

Full text:

The Government has recently published it's draft revision of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and this document includes a significant in paragraph 173, where it states that .."development resulting in the loss or deterioration of irreplaceable habitats (such as ancient woodland) should be refused, unless there are wholly exceptional reasons...." This is a clear direction of travel in Government planning policy and gives much stronger protection to ancient woodland than that given by Policy DM25 in your Development Management Plan. We would therefore like to see your Local Plan state that development affecting ancient woodland will only be permitted if there are wholly exceptional reasons.

We broadly support the statements in the existing policy DM25 on the need for more woodland creation and the locations in which this may be prioritised; for example adjacent to areas of ancient woodland and as part of green infrastructure in new housing development.

We would like to suggest that you also look at using access standards to determine how much new woodland may need to be created. The Woodland Trust has an Access to Woodland Standard whiich aspires that everyone should have a small wood of at least two hectares in size within 500 metres of their home and a larger wood of at least 20 hectares within 4km of their home. Currently our statistics show that 20 per cent of people in Rochford have a small wood within 500 metres of their home, which is slightly above the national average but less than in some neighbouring districts. We would be happy to discuss the access standard with your officers in more detail, if it is something you wish to consider for inclusion in your local plan.

Object

Issues and Options Document

A. Retain the existing policies on air quality

Representation ID: 35510

Received: 07/03/2018

Respondent: Woodland Trust

Representation Summary:

The policy needs to consider a wider range of possible pollutants and also consider ways in which trees can contribute to air quality improvement

Full text:

Policy DM29 is fine in so far as it goes but it is quite a short policy which only specifically refers to NO2 pollution, whereas there is much more concern recently about the impact of other pollutants such as particulates on human health.

We are also aware of an increasing body of research which shows the role which trees can play in helping to absorb pollutants and hence improve air quality, if the trees are of the right species and planted in the right locations: for example at busy road junctions. We have a report on this subject which can be found on our website at http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/publications/2012/04/urban-air-quality .

Comment

Issues and Options Document

How should we protect, manage and enhance our important habitats, nature conservation areas, geology and greenways?

Representation ID: 35530

Received: 07/03/2018

Respondent: Woodland Trust

Representation Summary:

We would like to see your Local Plan refer to the role of trees, woods and green infrastructure in helping to alleviate flooding.

Full text:

We have referred in our comments in the trees and woodland section to the need to strengthen ancient woodland policy in your new Local Plan, in line with emerging policies in the draft revised NPPF.

We would also like you to consider the role which trees and woods can play in improving water quality and lowering flood risk. There is a polcy on flood risk in your exisitng Core Strategy (ENV2) which does not mention a role for green infrastructure, trees or woods but there is increasing reseach on this subject. Some of this is summarised in our report "Stemming the Flow" which can be found on our website at http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/publications/2014/05/stemming-the-flow/

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.