Rochford Area Action Plan: Schedule of Modifications
Search representations
Results for Historic England search
New searchSupport
Rochford Area Action Plan: Schedule of Modifications
MM4
Representation ID: 34458
Received: 03/12/2014
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the additional criterion in Policy 1 which requires proposals to have adequate consideration for above ground heritage assets and below ground archaeology.
We welcome the additional criterion in Policy 1 which requires proposals to have adequate consideration for above ground heritage assets and below ground archaeology.
Support
Rochford Area Action Plan: Schedule of Modifications
MM5
Representation ID: 34459
Received: 03/12/2014
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the additional paragraph relating to the identification of opportunity sites within the town and amendments to the Proposals Map as shown in MM8 (is this Figure 6 or 8?). One of the opportunity sites is the Spar building on the east side of the Market Square, and our representation to the pre-submission document recommended that this building could be redeveloped to the benefit of the town's historic environment.
We welcome the additional paragraph relating to the identification of opportunity sites within the town and amendments to the Proposals Map as shown in MM8 (is this Figure 6 or 8?). One of the opportunity sites is the Spar building on the east side of the Market Square, and our representation to the pre-submission document recommended that this building could be redeveloped to the benefit of the town's historic environment.
Comment
Rochford Area Action Plan: Schedule of Modifications
MM7
Representation ID: 34460
Received: 03/12/2014
Respondent: Historic England
We regret the modification to Table 1, which draws back from more ambitious proposals to enhance the Market Square through reduced parking and a relocated taxi rank. This would have resulted in notable benefits for the historic environment of the town centre.
We regret the modification to Table 1, which draws back from more ambitious proposals to enhance the Market Square through reduced parking and a relocated taxi rank. This would have resulted in notable benefits for the historic environment of the town centre.
Comment
Rochford Area Action Plan: Schedule of Modifications
MM13
Representation ID: 34461
Received: 03/12/2014
Respondent: Historic England
As with MM7, we regret the modification to the fourth part of Policy 6, which draws back from more ambitious proposals to enhance the Market Square.
As with MM7, we regret the modification to the fourth part of Policy 6, which draws back from more ambitious proposals to enhance the Market Square.
Comment
Rochford Area Action Plan: Schedule of Modifications
MM14
Representation ID: 34462
Received: 03/12/2014
Respondent: Historic England
As with MM7 and MM13, we regret the modification in Section 5.2, which draws back from more ambitious proposals to enhance the Market Square.
As with MM7 and MM13, we regret the modification in Section 5.2, which draws back from more ambitious proposals to enhance the Market Square.
Comment
Rochford Area Action Plan: Schedule of Modifications
MM15
Representation ID: 34463
Received: 03/12/2014
Respondent: Historic England
In our representation to the pre-submission document, we welcomed the proposals for the Market Square which would have increased pavement space, reduced parking and potentially relocated the taxi rank. This would have offered notable benefits to the town centre's historic environment through improvements to the public realm. We preferred the more ambitious of the two proposals in the pre-submission document (Figure 12), but would have also welcomed the less radical proposal shown in Figure 11.
The final proposal, shown in MM15, represents little change to the existing layout and use of the Market Square, which is regrettable.
In our representation to the pre-submission document, we welcomed the proposals for the Market Square which would have increased pavement space, reduced parking and potentially relocated the taxi rank. This would have offered notable benefits to the town centre's historic environment through improvements to the public realm. We preferred the more ambitious of the two proposals in the pre-submission document (Figure 12), but would have also welcomed the less radical proposal shown in Figure 11.
The final proposal, shown in MM15, represents little change to the existing layout and use of the Market Square, which is regrettable.
