Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Search representations
Results for Rawreth Parish Council search
New searchObject
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
MM20
Representation ID: 32810
Received: 19/12/2013
Respondent: Rawreth Parish Council
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Allocations Submission Document: Consolidated list of modifications
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council I confirm that this letter is a formal response and representation of the Councils views with regards to the Allocations submission Document, following the interim report on the soundness of the plan issued by Mr David Smith BA(HONS) DMS MRTPI of the Planning Inspectorate .
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Yours faithfully
Mrs Hayley Bloomfield
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
MM31
Representation ID: 32811
Received: 19/12/2013
Respondent: Rawreth Parish Council
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Allocations Submission Document: Consolidated list of modifications
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council I confirm that this letter is a formal response and representation of the Councils views with regards to the Allocations submission Document, following the interim report on the soundness of the plan issued by Mr David Smith BA(HONS) DMS MRTPI of the Planning Inspectorate .
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Yours faithfully
Mrs Hayley Bloomfield
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
MM34
Representation ID: 32812
Received: 19/12/2013
Respondent: Rawreth Parish Council
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Allocations Submission Document: Consolidated list of modifications
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council I confirm that this letter is a formal response and representation of the Councils views with regards to the Allocations submission Document, following the interim report on the soundness of the plan issued by Mr David Smith BA(HONS) DMS MRTPI of the Planning Inspectorate .
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Yours faithfully
Mrs Hayley Bloomfield
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
MM38
Representation ID: 32813
Received: 19/12/2013
Respondent: Rawreth Parish Council
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Allocations Submission Document: Consolidated list of modifications
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council I confirm that this letter is a formal response and representation of the Councils views with regards to the Allocations submission Document, following the interim report on the soundness of the plan issued by Mr David Smith BA(HONS) DMS MRTPI of the Planning Inspectorate .
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Yours faithfully
Mrs Hayley Bloomfield
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
MM41
Representation ID: 32814
Received: 19/12/2013
Respondent: Rawreth Parish Council
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Allocations Submission Document: Consolidated list of modifications
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council I confirm that this letter is a formal response and representation of the Councils views with regards to the Allocations submission Document, following the interim report on the soundness of the plan issued by Mr David Smith BA(HONS) DMS MRTPI of the Planning Inspectorate .
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Yours faithfully
Mrs Hayley Bloomfield
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
MM44
Representation ID: 32815
Received: 19/12/2013
Respondent: Rawreth Parish Council
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Allocations Submission Document: Consolidated list of modifications
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council I confirm that this letter is a formal response and representation of the Councils views with regards to the Allocations submission Document, following the interim report on the soundness of the plan issued by Mr David Smith BA(HONS) DMS MRTPI of the Planning Inspectorate .
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Yours faithfully
Mrs Hayley Bloomfield
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
MM57
Representation ID: 32816
Received: 19/12/2013
Respondent: Rawreth Parish Council
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Allocations Submission Document: Consolidated list of modifications
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council I confirm that this letter is a formal response and representation of the Councils views with regards to the Allocations submission Document, following the interim report on the soundness of the plan issued by Mr David Smith BA(HONS) DMS MRTPI of the Planning Inspectorate .
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Yours faithfully
Mrs Hayley Bloomfield
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
MM71
Representation ID: 32817
Received: 19/12/2013
Respondent: Rawreth Parish Council
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Allocations Submission Document: Consolidated list of modifications
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council I confirm that this letter is a formal response and representation of the Councils views with regards to the Allocations submission Document, following the interim report on the soundness of the plan issued by Mr David Smith BA(HONS) DMS MRTPI of the Planning Inspectorate .
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Yours faithfully
Mrs Hayley Bloomfield
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
MM75
Representation ID: 32818
Received: 19/12/2013
Respondent: Rawreth Parish Council
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Allocations Submission Document: Consolidated list of modifications
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council I confirm that this letter is a formal response and representation of the Councils views with regards to the Allocations submission Document, following the interim report on the soundness of the plan issued by Mr David Smith BA(HONS) DMS MRTPI of the Planning Inspectorate .
Having studied the Inspectors interim report Rawreth Council strongly oppose the removal of the 5% flexibility capping as the removal of the 5% capping would leave no control over specific development sizes and would take away Localism.
In addition, removing the cap makes the previous public consultations unsound as the evidence base for sustainability was based on specific numbers. As Members of the public were consulted on a specified number of houses being built and this is then allowed to increase by an uncapped amount this rendering the process unsound. In addition by removing the cap and thus increasing the number of homes that can be built on specific sites the quality of life for residents both existing and new is diminished.
Yours faithfully
Mrs Hayley Bloomfield
On behalf of Rawreth Parish Council
