Development Management Submission Document
Search representations
Results for Rayleigh Town Council search
New searchSupport
Development Management Submission Document
3. The Green Belt and Countryside
Representation ID: 32721
Received: 17/07/2013
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in section 3 The Green Belt and Countryside.
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in section 3 The Green Belt and Countryside.
Support
Development Management Submission Document
4. Environmental Issues
Representation ID: 32722
Received: 17/07/2013
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in section 4 Environment Issues
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in section 4 Environment Issues
Support
Development Management Submission Document
5. Transport
Representation ID: 32723
Received: 17/07/2013
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in section 5 Transport
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in section 5 Transport
Support
Development Management Submission Document
6. Economic Development
Representation ID: 32724
Received: 17/07/2013
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in section 6 Economic Development.
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in section 6 Economic Development.
Support
Development Management Submission Document
7. Retail and Town Centres
Representation ID: 32725
Received: 17/07/2013
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in section 7 Retail and Town Centres
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in section 7 Retail and Town Centres
Support
Development Management Submission Document
7. Retail and Town Centres
Representation ID: 32726
Received: 17/07/2013
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in section 7 Retail and Town Centres.
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in section 7 Retail and Town Centres.
Support
Development Management Submission Document
Appendix 1 - Advice on the Design of Waste and Recyclables Storage and Collection Requirements
Representation ID: 32727
Received: 17/07/2013
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in appendix 1 - Advice on the Design of Waste & Recyclables storage & Collection requirements.
Rayleigh Town Council has no significant reason to object to the content of each of the items incorporated in appendix 1 - Advice on the Design of Waste & Recyclables storage & Collection requirements.
Support
Development Management Submission Document
Policy DM25 - Trees and Woodlands
Representation ID: 32728
Received: 17/07/2013
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
The Town Council feel this appears muddled. We feel that the paragraph starting " reading conditions will also be attached... should read " Conditions will be attached to planning permissions to encourage the proper management of these important trees and woodlands, where appropriate. Additionally,the completion of a legal agreement will be required to secdure the provision of replacement trees and woodlands of equivalent value and/or area as appropriate, and to ensure the future management of these features.
The Town Council feel this appears muddled. We feel that the paragraph starting " reading conditions will also be attached... should read " Conditions will be attached to planning permissions to encourage the proper management of these important trees and woodlands, where appropriate. Additionally,the completion of a legal agreement will be required to secdure the provision of replacement trees and woodlands of equivalent value and/or area as appropriate, and to ensure the future management of these features.
Support
Development Management Submission Document
Policy DM26 - Other Important Landscape Features
Representation ID: 32729
Received: 17/07/2013
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
In Policy DM26, the word "for" needs deleting from "measures can be provided for". In the final paragraph the word "also" should be deleted and "In addition to, or instead of" should be replaced with "Additionally".
In Policy DM26, the word "for" needs deleting from "measures can be provided for". In the final paragraph the word "also" should be deleted and "In addition to, or instead of" should be replaced with "Additionally".
Support
Development Management Submission Document
Policy DM4 - Habitable Floorspace for New Developments
Representation ID: 32730
Received: 17/07/2013
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Where it says "'I' is light Intensity in Candelas." it should say "'I' is light Intensity in Kilocandelas." to be consistent with the table, which says "Source Intensity l (kcd)" This is clearly intended to be source intensity in Kilocandelas and to be entirely pedantic the correct abbreviation is Kcd. Candela is an SI definition of the old term "candle power" and common sense tells us that a maximum source intensity of 10 candle power is not going to be very bright.
The Notes to Table 4: Where it says "'Ev' is Vertical Illuminance in Lux and is measured flat on the glazing at the centre of the window." It should say "'Ev' is horizontal Illuminance in Lux and is measured flat on the glazing at the centre of the window." Presumably, the symbol used in the note and in the table should be Eh and not Ev. Windows are usually mounted vertically and so if you measure the illuminance flat on the glazing at the centre of the window you can only measure horizontal illuminance. Any vertical illuminance will not fall on the window.
