Allocations Submission Document
Search representations
Results for Aber Ltd search
New searchSupport
Allocations Submission Document
Policy SER3 - West Hockley
Representation ID: 28956
Received: 24/01/2013
Respondent: Aber Ltd
Agent: Colliers International
This allocation would involve the redeveloped of previously developed land and create a defensible Green Belt boundary.
This allocation would involve the redeveloped of previously developed land and create a defensible Green Belt boundary.
Support
Allocations Submission Document
Policy SER4 - South Hawkwell
Representation ID: 28957
Received: 24/01/2013
Respondent: Aber Ltd
Agent: Colliers International
Support this allocation which is located to the north of Rectory Road, and within the existing settlement. However, it is noted that there is a risk of flooding to the northern part of the site and it would need to be designed in order to ensure that the more vulnerable uses (e.g. residential) are not located in this area.
Support this allocation which is located to the north of Rectory Road, and within the existing settlement. However, it is noted that there is a risk of flooding to the northern part of the site and it would need to be designed in order to ensure that the more vulnerable uses (e.g. residential) are not located in this area.
Support
Allocations Submission Document
Policy SER5 - East Ashingdon
Representation ID: 28958
Received: 24/01/2013
Respondent: Aber Ltd
Agent: Colliers International
Support, this allocation which is considered to be a sustainable extension to the settlement and would also be compatible with the expansion of King Edmund School.
It is understood that planning permission has already been approved for this site and as such this document should include reference to this.
Support, this allocation which is considered to be a sustainable extension to the settlement and would also be compatible with the expansion of King Edmund School.
It is understood that planning permission has already been approved for this site and as such this document should include reference to this.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Policy SER6 - South West Hullbridge
Representation ID: 28959
Received: 24/01/2013
Respondent: Aber Ltd
Agent: Colliers International
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
It is not considered that this location has good access to public transport [trains] and therefore these residents will be more dependent on the private car; would also question the suitability of the existing road network to cope with the level of traffic associated with the proposed 500 dwellings; a significant increase to the existing settlement.
The allocation would result in a large addition to the western side of the existing settlement, and although it would follow the existing field boundaries, it is not considered that this would result in defensible boundary.
It is not considered that this location has good access to public transport [trains] and therefore these residents will be more dependent on the private car; would also question the suitability of the existing road network to cope with the level of traffic associated with the proposed 500 dwellings; a significant increase to the existing settlement.
The allocation would result in a large addition to the western side of the existing settlement, and although it would follow the existing field boundaries, it is not considered that this would result in defensible boundary.
Support
Allocations Submission Document
Policy SER7 - South Canewdon
Representation ID: 28960
Received: 24/01/2013
Respondent: Aber Ltd
Agent: Colliers International
This allocation relates to a small scale addition (60 dwellings), which is considered to be proportionate to the scale of the existing settlement and assist in supporting existing services and facilities.
This allocation relates to a small scale addition (60 dwellings), which is considered to be proportionate to the scale of the existing settlement and assist in supporting existing services and facilities.
Support
Allocations Submission Document
Policy SER8 - South East Ashingdon
Representation ID: 28961
Received: 24/01/2013
Respondent: Aber Ltd
Agent: Colliers International
This Policy relates to a site located to the north of Rochford with good links to the town centre and the train station.
This site is currently surrounded by residential to the north, south and west and would result in the 'squaring of' of the existing settlement, which would establish a defensible boundary, and coincide with eastern edge of the existing residential areas to the north and south. This would enable the eastern boundary to line up with The Drive (to the south), improving the sites connectivity to the existing areas.
Support the approach detailed in paragraph 3.221; however, notwithstanding the site been safeguarded to 2021, in accordance with the 'plan, monitor, manage' approach, the site could be delivered early in order to meet the Districts 5-year housing supply.
The eastern boundary would consist of a natural / semi-natural greenspace in order to create a defensible boundary to the Green Belt. This greenspace would be publicly accessible and would accommodate a Greenway (incorporating pedestrian and cycle routes), linking St Edmunds school (to the north), with the town centre (to the south).
In addition, to the natural / semi-natural greenspace within the development there would be appropriate located and designed play facilities located throughout the site.
This Policy relates to a site located to the north of Rochford with good links to the town centre and the train station.
This site is currently surrounded by residential to the north, south and west and would result in the 'squaring of' of the existing settlement, which would establish a defensible boundary, and coincide with eastern edge of the existing residential areas to the north and south. This would enable the eastern boundary to line up with The Drive (to the south), improving the sites connectivity to the existing areas.
Support the approach detailed in paragraph 3.221; however, notwithstanding the site been safeguarded to 2021, in accordance with the 'plan, monitor, manage' approach, the site could be delivered early in order to meet the Districts 5-year housing supply.
The eastern boundary would consist of a natural / semi-natural greenspace in order to create a defensible boundary to the Green Belt. This greenspace would be publicly accessible and would accommodate a Greenway (incorporating pedestrian and cycle routes), linking St Edmunds school (to the north), with the town centre (to the south).
In addition, to the natural / semi-natural greenspace within the development there would be appropriate located and designed play facilities located throughout the site.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Policy SER9 - West Great Wakering
Representation ID: 28962
Received: 24/01/2013
Respondent: Aber Ltd
Agent: Colliers International
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
In respect of this proposed allocations; SER9a would square of the existing settlement and SER9b be would be developed to the rear of the High Street; resulting in a cohesion extension to the existing settlement. However, there is a concern that the proposed 250 dwellings, when combined with the dwellings proposed at the Star Lane Industrial Estate, would result in a significant increase to the existing settlement.
In respect of this proposed allocations; SER9a would square of the existing settlement and SER9b be would be developed to the rear of the High Street; resulting in a cohesion extension to the existing settlement. However, there is a concern that the proposed 250 dwellings, when combined with the dwellings proposed at the Star Lane Industrial Estate, would result in a significant increase to the existing settlement.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Policy NEL1 - South of London Road, Rayleigh
Representation ID: 28963
Received: 24/01/2013
Respondent: Aber Ltd
Agent: Colliers International
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The proposed employment site is located within the Green Belt and as such there are a number of concerns:
* The location would be difficult to access by public transport (would be further away from the train station than the existing industrial estate that they seek to replace), which means that it would be in not as sustainable location; and
* The location of new offices in the proposed location would not accord with the locational requirements detailed within the NPPF.
Rawreth Industrial Park is a sustainable location, and a more sustainable approach would be to redevelop the industrial park with a commercial scheme with a design of unit that is flexible enough to accommodate a range of employment uses.
The idea of de-allocating land in a sustainable location in order that it can be allocated for housing and then identifying new employment sites in less sustainable locations than the existing site is a contradiction.
The proposed employment site is located within the Green Belt and as such there are a number of concerns:
* The location would be difficult to access by public transport (would be further away from the train station than the existing industrial estate that they seek to replace), which means that it would be in not as sustainable location; and
* The location of new offices in the proposed location would not accord with the locational requirements detailed within the NPPF.
Rawreth Industrial Park is a sustainable location, and a more sustainable approach would be to redevelop the industrial park with a commercial scheme with a design of unit that is flexible enough to accommodate a range of employment uses.
The idea of de-allocating land in a sustainable location in order that it can be allocated for housing and then identifying new employment sites in less sustainable locations than the existing site is a contradiction.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Policy NEL2 - West of the A1245, Rayleigh
Representation ID: 28964
Received: 24/01/2013
Respondent: Aber Ltd
Agent: Colliers International
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The proposed employment site is located within the Green Belt, and as such there are a number of concerns:
* The location would be difficult to access by public transport (would be further away from the train station than the existing industrial estate that they seek to replace), which means that it would be in not as sustainable location;
* The locations of new offices in the proposed location would not accord with the locational requirements detailed within the NPPF; and
* This is an isolated location within the Green Belt, which would make it difficult to establish a defensible boundary and also contribute to the coalescence of the neighbouring settlements.
As Rawreth Industrial Park is a sustainable location, a better approach would be to redevelop the industrial park with a commercial scheme with a design of unit that is flexible enough to accommodate a range of employment uses.
The idea of de-allocating land in a sustainable location in order that it can be allocated for housing and then identifying new employment sites in less sustainable locations than the existing site is a contradiction.
The proposed employment site is located within the Green Belt, and as such there are a number of concerns:
* The location would be difficult to access by public transport (would be further away from the train station than the existing industrial estate that they seek to replace), which means that it would be in not as sustainable location;
* The locations of new offices in the proposed location would not accord with the locational requirements detailed within the NPPF; and
* This is an isolated location within the Green Belt, which would make it difficult to establish a defensible boundary and also contribute to the coalescence of the neighbouring settlements.
As Rawreth Industrial Park is a sustainable location, a better approach would be to redevelop the industrial park with a commercial scheme with a design of unit that is flexible enough to accommodate a range of employment uses.
The idea of de-allocating land in a sustainable location in order that it can be allocated for housing and then identifying new employment sites in less sustainable locations than the existing site is a contradiction.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Policy NEL3 - South of Great Wakering
Representation ID: 28965
Received: 24/01/2013
Respondent: Aber Ltd
Agent: Colliers International
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
This Policy relates to a single parcel, south of the brickworks; it would be detached from the existing settlement and would extend further south than the existing settlement, and be in close proximity to the boundary with Southend. In addition, it would also have a potential conflict with other allocations proposed for Great Wakering location (BFR1 & SER9).
This location would be further away from public transport and existing services and facilities than the existing industrial estate that it seeks to replace, which means that it would be in not as sustainable location. The locations of commercial accommodation in the proposed location would not accord with the locational requirements detailed within the NPPF.
This Policy relates to a single parcel, south of the brickworks; it would be detached from the existing settlement and would extend further south than the existing settlement, and be in close proximity to the boundary with Southend. In addition, it would also have a potential conflict with other allocations proposed for Great Wakering location (BFR1 & SER9).
This location would be further away from public transport and existing services and facilities than the existing industrial estate that it seeks to replace, which means that it would be in not as sustainable location. The locations of commercial accommodation in the proposed location would not accord with the locational requirements detailed within the NPPF.
