Allocations Submission Document
Search representations
Results for Bull Lane Development Group search
New searchObject
Allocations Submission Document
Policy SER6 - South West Hullbridge
Representation ID: 29162
Received: 25/01/2013
Respondent: Bull Lane Development Group
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
1. The site is not integrated with existing villag eand therefore not promoting community cohesion.
2. No mention in report how major highway improvements are to be implemented.
Watery Lane has been closed for over 2 months, with floods, the field one side being 2 feet higher and drains blocked. A danger to life, with people who have been trapped and accidents. A problem which has been ongoing and reported constantly.
Developers will not pay for upgrades to Watery Lane, capacity for transport is I believe at its limit. Improvements to highways should be undertaken prior to new houses being built. Also when Fairglen Interchange is flooded this has a knock on effect with cars moving to other roads, affected by SER1.
If residents of the housing in SER6b live in Rawreth, they will not be part of Hullbridge, and therefore will not form community cohesion, paying parish precept to Rawreth yet using facilities of Hullbridge.
DPD is not sound because it does not include proposals to adequately mitigate potential impacts on comments 1 and 2.
1. The site is not integrated with existing villag eand therefore not promoting community cohesion.
2. No mention in report how major highway improvements are to be implemented.
Watery Lane has been closed for over 2 months, with floods, the field one side being 2 feet higher and drains blocked. A danger to life, with people who have been trapped and accidents. A problem which has been ongoing and reported constantly.
Developers will not pay for upgrades to Watery Lane, capacity for transport is I believe at its limit. Improvements to highways should be undertaken prior to new houses being built. Also when Fairglen Interchange is flooded this has a knock on effect with cars moving to other roads, affected by SER1.
If residents of the housing in SER6b live in Rawreth, they will not be part of Hullbridge, and therefore will not form community cohesion, paying parish precept to Rawreth yet using facilities of Hullbridge.
DPD is not sound because it does not include proposals to adequately mitigate potential impacts on comments 1 and 2.
