Allocations Submission Document
Search representations
Results for Chelmsford City Council search
New searchSupport
Allocations Submission Document
Policy SER1 - North of London Road, Rayleigh
Representation ID: 28454
Received: 15/01/2013
Respondent: Chelmsford City Council
Officers are pleased to see that previous suggestions for new community services and facilities as part of the development have been taken on board.
Officers are pleased to see that previous suggestions for new community services and facilities as part of the development have been taken on board.
Support
Allocations Submission Document
Policy NEL1 - South of London Road, Rayleigh
Representation ID: 28455
Received: 15/01/2013
Respondent: Chelmsford City Council
Officers consider that if all the development (residential, employment and a Gypsy and Traveller site) is promoted in the area west of Rayleigh/ south east of Rawreth, the cumulative impact on Battlesbridge would need to be carefully considered. Officers would not want to see any adverse impacts on this existing community.
Officers consider that if all the development (residential, employment and a Gypsy and Traveller site) is promoted in the area west of Rayleigh/ south east of Rawreth, the cumulative impact on Battlesbridge would need to be carefully considered. Officers would not want to see any adverse impacts on this existing community.
Support
Allocations Submission Document
Policy GT1 - Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation
Representation ID: 28457
Received: 15/01/2013
Respondent: Chelmsford City Council
Officers consider it would have been helpful if the DPD included information on the criteria used to select this site, as well as greater details on whether the landowners are willing to release the site for this purpose.
The site assessment for this proposal will be contained within the Sustainability Appraisal which will be published for consultation at a later date. Officers feel unable to comment specifically on whether the proposed site is in the most suitable location but as either support or object has to be selected it has been necessary to select support.
Officers consider it would have been helpful if the DPD included information on the criteria used to select this site, as well as greater details on whether the landowners are willing to release the site for this purpose.
The site assessment for this proposal will be contained within the Sustainability Appraisal which will be published for consultation at a later date. Officers feel unable to comment specifically on whether the proposed site is in the most suitable location but as either support or object has to be selected it has been necessary to select support.
