Core Strategy Submission Document

Object

Representation ID: 16203

Received: 02/11/2009

Respondent: CPREssex

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The policies are unsound because the Core Strategy does not take into account the fact that the supply of brownfield sites is not static.

If further brownfield sites come forward this should trigger a review of the need to release land from the Green Belt. The Strategy needs to contain such a Police.cxc

Object

Representation ID: 16207

Received: 02/11/2009

Respondent: CPREssex

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

CPREssex is very concerned at the policies for new housing which state that there is a lack of alternative or brownfield sites and therefore Green Belt must be released for development The quantity of brownfield sites is not static and more will be created during the plan period.

Object

Representation ID: 16211

Received: 02/11/2009

Respondent: CPREssex

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Stambride Mill - CPREssex made a previouse objection to the use of this site for residential development. The site is detached from any existing settlement and with no public transport or other services would not reduce car-dependancy.

Any development would require flood protection to comply with PPS25's exceptions test.

Object

Representation ID: 16217

Received: 02/11/2009

Respondent: CPREssex

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Policy GB1 is unsound as the principles of PPG2 have not been adhered to. An overall review of the Green Belt should have carried out and boundaries firmly drawn so they can be maintained.

CPREssex wishes to see the Policy wording revised to bring it into line with PPG2.

Object

Representation ID: 16223

Received: 02/11/2009

Respondent: CPREssex

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

This policy on Large Scale Renewable Energy Projects seems too be rather weak. The impact of any such development can be considerable, not only in areas already well protected, but also on the landscape/countryside in general.

Object

Representation ID: 16226

Received: 02/11/2009

Respondent: CPREssex

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

CPREssex have already responded in detail to plans for the expansion of the airport. We are concerned that the creation of so many jobs is dependent on expansion of the airport and also at the concentration of employment uses in this area. The proposed employment site to the north of Aviation Way creates a very large area of employment uses concentrated in one area. This could lead to traffic problems both locally and over a wider area.