Core Strategy Submission Document
Search representations
Results for Rayleigh Town Council search
New searchSupport
Core Strategy Submission Document
Policy T8 - Parking Standards
Representation ID: 16103
Received: 29/10/2009
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
We strongly support what is a commonsense approach to the provision of minimum parking standards to residential developments.
We strongly support what is a commonsense approach to the provision of minimum parking standards to residential developments.
Support
Core Strategy Submission Document
Policy CLT6 - Community Facilities
Representation ID: 16105
Received: 29/10/2009
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Strongly support this
Strongly support this
Object
Core Strategy Submission Document
4.19
Representation ID: 16106
Received: 29/10/2009
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A better alternative would be to locate some of these on proposed brownfield sites in Rawreth village. The remainder could be located on smaller sites in Rayleigh which have been ruled out by the preference for this larger area.
P43 Para 4.19 States that development should have the potential to create a defensible Green belt boundary.The proposal for 550 houses on land "north of London Rd" is unsound in that it creates a boundary that is difficult to defend until the A1245 road is reached. A better alternative would be to locate some proposed brownfield sites in Rawreth. The remainder could be located on smaller sites in Rayleigh which have been ruled out by the preference for this larger area.
.This would meet the guidance in PPG2 "to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built up areas" preventing the eventual coalescence of Rayleigh, Rawreth and Shotgate
