Core Strategy Submission Document

Search representations

Results for H R Philpot and Sons and P W Robinson search

New search New search

Object

Core Strategy Submission Document

Policy H2 - Extensions to residential envelopes and phasing

Representation ID: 16086

Received: 29/10/2009

Respondent: H R Philpot and Sons and P W Robinson

Agent: Bidwells

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Policies H2 and H3 should deliver growth by extending existing settlements and Council's overall approach should be encouraged. Fundamentally, the detailed locations and quantum of development should be articulated within the Allocations DPD.

We cannot support the key diagram or the detailed descriptions for the locations of future development contained in policies H2 and H3 as the proposed extensions to residential envelopes pre and post 2021 are too site specific. It is considered that the Core Strategy should identify land at Hullbridge as a growth location and not specifically land South-West of Hullbridge.

Full text:

Policies H2 and H3 should deliver growth by extending existing settlements and Council's overall approach should be encouraged. Fundamentally, the detailed locations and quantum of development should be articulated within the Allocations DPD.

We cannot support the key diagram or the detailed descriptions for the locations of future development contained in policies H2 and H3 as the proposed extensions to residential envelopes pre and post 2021 are too site specific. It is considered that the Core Strategy should identify land at Hullbridge as a growth location and not specifically land South-West of Hullbridge.

Object

Core Strategy Submission Document

Policy H3 - Extension to residential envelopes post-2021

Representation ID: 16087

Received: 29/10/2009

Respondent: H R Philpot and Sons and P W Robinson

Agent: Bidwells

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Policies H2 and H3 should deliver growth by extending existing settlements and Council's overall approach should be encouraged. However, fundamentally the detailed locations and quantum of development should be articulated within the Allocations DPD.

We cannot support the key diagram or the detailed descriptions for the locations of future development contained in policies H2 and H3 as the proposed extensions to residential envelopes pre and post 2021 are too site specific. It is considered that the Core Strategy should identify land at Hullbridge as a growth location and not specifically land South-West of Hullbridge.

Full text:

Policies H2 and H3 should deliver growth by extending existing settlements and Council's overall approach should be encouraged. However, fundamentally the detailed locations and quantum of development should be articulated within the Allocations DPD.

We cannot support the key diagram or the detailed descriptions for the locations of future development contained in policies H2 and H3 as the proposed extensions to residential envelopes pre and post 2021 are too site specific. It is considered that the Core Strategy should identify land at Hullbridge as a growth location and not specifically land South-West of Hullbridge.

Object

Core Strategy Submission Document

Key Diagram

Representation ID: 16092

Received: 29/10/2009

Respondent: H R Philpot and Sons and P W Robinson

Agent: Bidwells

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The proposed extensions to residential envelopes pre and post 2021 are too site specific. The purpose of the Core Strategy is not to identify specific locations but indicate general areas for future development. The Core Strategy should identify land at Hullbridge as a growth location and not specifically land South-West of Hullbridge. Fundamentally, the detailed locations and quantum of development should be tested through and articulated within the Allocations DPD.

The Key Diagram is missing the opportunity to identify opportunities for public open space, parkland and riverside walks which also exist at Hullbridge, particularly to the West.

Full text:

We support the Council's identification of Hullbridge as a growth location but cannot support the key diagram as the proposed extensions to residential envelopes pre and post 2021 are too site specific. The purpose of the Core Stratgy is not to identify specific locations but indicate general areas for future development. The Core Strategy should identify land at Hullbridge as a growth location and not specifically land South-West of Hullbridge. Fundamentally, the detailed locations and quantum of development should be tested through and articulated within the Allocations DPD.

We consider it appropriate for the Key Diagram to indicate locations for new open space, parkland and riverside walks which should be assessed in terms of feasibility. There are opportunities for Hullbridge to be enhanced with the introduction of high quality public open space, parkland and riverside walks as well as appropriate links to facilities such as the local infant and primary school which would be essential elements of an extension to Hullbridge.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.