Core Strategy Submission Document
Search representations
Results for Sanctuary housing association search
New searchSupport
Core Strategy Submission Document
4.6
Representation ID: 15887
Received: 20/10/2009
Respondent: Sanctuary housing association
The document correctly identifies the miss-match between housing targets set in the regional plan and local provision within developed areas of Rochford. There is pressure on the green belt as a result, and some relaxation should be sought
The document correctly identifies the miss-match between housing targets set in the regional plan and local provision within developed areas of Rochford. There is pressure on the green belt as a result, and some relaxation should be sought
Object
Core Strategy Submission Document
Policy H1 - The efficient use of land for housing
Representation ID: 15888
Received: 20/10/2009
Respondent: Sanctuary housing association
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
We would welcome prioritising brown land for development, but note later comments on limiting density. The costs of developing Brown land ( dealing with previous buildings, contamination, etc) are often high, and unless a reasonable density of development is allowed on brown land, the costs per property can be uneconomic.
We would welcome prioritising brown land for development, but note later comments on limiting density. The costs of developing Brown land ( dealing with previous buildings, contamination, etc) are often high, and unless a reasonable density of development is allowed on brown land, the costs per property can be uneconomic.
Support
Core Strategy Submission Document
Policy H4 - Affordable Housing
Representation ID: 15889
Received: 20/10/2009
Respondent: Sanctuary housing association
We support the proposal that 35% of developments is a suitable target for provision of affordable under S106.
We also would welcome the inclusion of rural exception sites as an option for affordable housing and the publication of Housing Need Studies where appropriate.
We support the proposal that 35% of developments is a suitable target for provision of affordable under S106.
We also would welcome the inclusion of rural exception sites as an option for affordable housing and the publication of Housing Need Studies where appropriate.
Support
Core Strategy Submission Document
Policy H5 - Dwelling Types
Representation ID: 15890
Received: 20/10/2009
Respondent: Sanctuary housing association
We support the requirement for affordable housing elements to reflect the Strategic housing market assessment, and in particular we believe that the provision of houses as opposed to flats should be encouraged
We support the requirement for affordable housing elements to reflect the Strategic housing market assessment, and in particular we believe that the provision of houses as opposed to flats should be encouraged
Support
Core Strategy Submission Document
Policy H6 - Lifetime Homes
Representation ID: 15891
Received: 20/10/2009
Respondent: Sanctuary housing association
We note the requirement for all developments after 2010 to comply and support this generally, although there will be cost implications and the LA will need to support any increase in grant bid levels as a result
We note the requirement for all developments after 2010 to comply and support this generally, although there will be cost implications and the LA will need to support any increase in grant bid levels as a result
Support
Core Strategy Submission Document
Policy ENV9 - Code for Sustainable Homes
Representation ID: 15892
Received: 20/10/2009
Respondent: Sanctuary housing association
We support the requirement to achieve Code 3 by 2010.
We support the requirement to achieve Code 3 by 2010.
