London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options

The following representations on the above mentioned plan are made on behalf of
Hanson Building Products Limited.

Employment Al locations

Policy E1: General Development Considerations - the general proposal to develop the JAAP area as a strategic employment area is supported. Preferred Option 2 which advocates the pursuit of high scale employment growth that will make a significant contribution towards regional employment aspirations is also suppofted.

Policy E3: Saxon Business Park - the identification of employment Area 1A for 81
uses is supported.

Policy E4: Phasing of Saxon Business Park - the identification of Area 1A as the first phase of development within the business park is supported.

Policy E5: Development of Area 1A Saxon Business Park and Policy T3: Upgrade to Cherry Orchard Way these policies identify a requirement to upgrade Cherry Orchard Way to dual carriageway standard; the need to provide access to the business park, the need to provide the initial section of a new estate road and provision of a green corridor.

The policies and suppofting text provide very little information on the mechanisms for delivery of site infrastructure works or the contributions individual developers will be expected to make towards them. As any new access junction into the Saxon Business Park will have to be designed from the outset to accommodate the future dualling of Cherry Orchard Way and the new estate road will similarly have to be
designed to accommodate future traffic volumes anticipated from the business park
when it is fully developed, they are inevitably going to be of a higher specification than would be needed solely to service Area 1A. It would be unreasonable for Area 1A to have to bear the burden of these increased costs.

Whilst it is accepted that the specifics of site infrastructure works are not defined at
this stage, in order to provide clarity and ceftainty to potential developers on the
likely scale of these costs, the policies and/or suppofting text should include more
detail on the anticipated contribution each phase is expected to make to site infrastructure costs and the mechanisms for calculating it. For example, the plan should confirm whether contributions will be by means of physical works, financial contributions to a communal pot or a combination of the two. The plan should also
indicate how costs will apportioned, whether by means of site area/likely usage etc and confirm what, if any, contribution is expected to be made from the public purse and whether there are any timing issues associated with this.

The following representations on the above mentioned plan are made on behalf of
Hanson Building Products Limited.

Employment Al locations

Policy E1: General Development Considerations - the general proposal to develop the JAAP area as a strategic employment area is supported. Preferred Option 2 which advocates the pursuit of high scale employment growth that will make a significant contribution towards regional employment aspirations is also suppofted.

Policy E3: Saxon Business Park - the identification of employment Area 1A for 81
uses is supported.

Policy E4: Phasing of Saxon Business Park - the identification of Area 1A as the first phase of development within the business park is supported.

Policy E5: Development of Area 1A Saxon Business Park and Policy T3: Upgrade to Cherry Orchard Way these policies identify a requirement to upgrade Cherry Orchard Way to dual carriageway standard; the need to provide access to the business park, the need to provide the initial section of a new estate road and provision of a green corridor.

The policies and suppofting text provide very little information on the mechanisms for delivery of site infrastructure works or the contributions individual developers will be expected to make towards them. As any new access junction into the Saxon Business Park will have to be designed from the outset to accommodate the future dualling of Cherry Orchard Way and the new estate road will similarly have to be
designed to accommodate future traffic volumes anticipated from the business park
when it is fully developed, they are inevitably going to be of a higher specification than would be needed solely to service Area 1A. It would be unreasonable for Area 1A to have to bear the burden of these increased costs.

Whilst it is accepted that the specifics of site infrastructure works are not defined at
this stage, in order to provide clarity and ceftainty to potential developers on the
likely scale of these costs, the policies and/or suppofting text should include more
detail on the anticipated contribution each phase is expected to make to site infrastructure costs and the mechanisms for calculating it. For example, the plan should confirm whether contributions will be by means of physical works, financial contributions to a communal pot or a combination of the two. The plan should also
indicate how costs will apportioned, whether by means of site area/likely usage etc and confirm what, if any, contribution is expected to be made from the public purse and whether there are any timing issues associated with this.

The following representations on the above mentioned plan are made on behalf of
Hanson Building Products Limited.

Employment Al locations

Policy E1: General Development Considerations - the general proposal to develop the JAAP area as a strategic employment area is supported. Preferred Option 2 which advocates the pursuit of high scale employment growth that will make a significant contribution towards regional employment aspirations is also suppofted.

Policy E3: Saxon Business Park - the identification of employment Area 1A for 81
uses is supported.

Policy E4: Phasing of Saxon Business Park - the identification of Area 1A as the first phase of development within the business park is supported.

Policy E5: Development of Area 1A Saxon Business Park and Policy T3: Upgrade to Cherry Orchard Way these policies identify a requirement to upgrade Cherry Orchard Way to dual carriageway standard; the need to provide access to the business park, the need to provide the initial section of a new estate road and provision of a green corridor.

The policies and suppofting text provide very little information on the mechanisms for delivery of site infrastructure works or the contributions individual developers will be expected to make towards them. As any new access junction into the Saxon Business Park will have to be designed from the outset to accommodate the future dualling of Cherry Orchard Way and the new estate road will similarly have to be
designed to accommodate future traffic volumes anticipated from the business park
when it is fully developed, they are inevitably going to be of a higher specification than would be needed solely to service Area 1A. It would be unreasonable for Area 1A to have to bear the burden of these increased costs.

Whilst it is accepted that the specifics of site infrastructure works are not defined at
this stage, in order to provide clarity and ceftainty to potential developers on the
likely scale of these costs, the policies and/or suppofting text should include more
detail on the anticipated contribution each phase is expected to make to site infrastructure costs and the mechanisms for calculating it. For example, the plan should confirm whether contributions will be by means of physical works, financial contributions to a communal pot or a combination of the two. The plan should also
indicate how costs will apportioned, whether by means of site area/likely usage etc and confirm what, if any, contribution is expected to be made from the public purse and whether there are any timing issues associated with this.

The following representations on the above mentioned plan are made on behalf of
Hanson Building Products Limited.

Employment Al locations

Policy E1: General Development Considerations - the general proposal to develop the JAAP area as a strategic employment area is supported. Preferred Option 2 which advocates the pursuit of high scale employment growth that will make a significant contribution towards regional employment aspirations is also suppofted.

Policy E3: Saxon Business Park - the identification of employment Area 1A for 81
uses is supported.

Policy E4: Phasing of Saxon Business Park - the identification of Area 1A as the first phase of development within the business park is supported.

Policy E5: Development of Area 1A Saxon Business Park and Policy T3: Upgrade to Cherry Orchard Way these policies identify a requirement to upgrade Cherry Orchard Way to dual carriageway standard; the need to provide access to the business park, the need to provide the initial section of a new estate road and provision of a green corridor.

The policies and suppofting text provide very little information on the mechanisms for delivery of site infrastructure works or the contributions individual developers will be expected to make towards them. As any new access junction into the Saxon Business Park will have to be designed from the outset to accommodate the future dualling of Cherry Orchard Way and the new estate road will similarly have to be
designed to accommodate future traffic volumes anticipated from the business park
when it is fully developed, they are inevitably going to be of a higher specification than would be needed solely to service Area 1A. It would be unreasonable for Area 1A to have to bear the burden of these increased costs.

Whilst it is accepted that the specifics of site infrastructure works are not defined at
this stage, in order to provide clarity and ceftainty to potential developers on the
likely scale of these costs, the policies and/or suppofting text should include more
detail on the anticipated contribution each phase is expected to make to site infrastructure costs and the mechanisms for calculating it. For example, the plan should confirm whether contributions will be by means of physical works, financial contributions to a communal pot or a combination of the two. The plan should also
indicate how costs will apportioned, whether by means of site area/likely usage etc and confirm what, if any, contribution is expected to be made from the public purse and whether there are any timing issues associated with this.

The following representations on the above mentioned plan are made on behalf of
Hanson Building Products Limited.

Employment Al locations

Policy E1: General Development Considerations - the general proposal to develop the JAAP area as a strategic employment area is supported. Preferred Option 2 which advocates the pursuit of high scale employment growth that will make a significant contribution towards regional employment aspirations is also suppofted.

Policy E3: Saxon Business Park - the identification of employment Area 1A for 81
uses is supported.

Policy E4: Phasing of Saxon Business Park - the identification of Area 1A as the first phase of development within the business park is supported.

Policy E5: Development of Area 1A Saxon Business Park and Policy T3: Upgrade to Cherry Orchard Way these policies identify a requirement to upgrade Cherry Orchard Way to dual carriageway standard; the need to provide access to the business park, the need to provide the initial section of a new estate road and provision of a green corridor.

The policies and suppofting text provide very little information on the mechanisms for delivery of site infrastructure works or the contributions individual developers will be expected to make towards them. As any new access junction into the Saxon Business Park will have to be designed from the outset to accommodate the future dualling of Cherry Orchard Way and the new estate road will similarly have to be
designed to accommodate future traffic volumes anticipated from the business park
when it is fully developed, they are inevitably going to be of a higher specification than would be needed solely to service Area 1A. It would be unreasonable for Area 1A to have to bear the burden of these increased costs.

Whilst it is accepted that the specifics of site infrastructure works are not defined at
this stage, in order to provide clarity and ceftainty to potential developers on the
likely scale of these costs, the policies and/or suppofting text should include more
detail on the anticipated contribution each phase is expected to make to site infrastructure costs and the mechanisms for calculating it. For example, the plan should confirm whether contributions will be by means of physical works, financial contributions to a communal pot or a combination of the two. The plan should also
indicate how costs will apportioned, whether by means of site area/likely usage etc and confirm what, if any, contribution is expected to be made from the public purse and whether there are any timing issues associated with this.