London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for The Len Forge Centre search
New searchObject
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Policy E8 - Nestuda Way Business Park
Representation ID: 10753
Received: 08/05/2009
Respondent: The Len Forge Centre
The area intended for this small business park is a potential gateway to Southend and Rochford and would be rendered visually unattractive by any commercial development no matter how well sculptured it may be initially.
Development of the site will also represent a loss of green space - albeit agricultural at present.
The Len Forge Centre has plans to absorb this area into its playing fields as an additional amenity for the sporting community of Southend - specifically ladies and youth football.
A sport related development would be much better than any industrial use.
The area intended for this small business park is a potential gateway to Southend and Rochford and would be rendered visually unattractive by any commercial development no matter how well sculptured it may be initially.
Development of the site will also represent a loss of green space - albeit agricultural at present.
The Len Forge Centre has plans to absorb this area into its playing fields as an additional amenity for the sporting community of Southend - specifically ladies and youth football.
A sport related development would be much better than any industrial use.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Policy LS2 - Development at London Southend Airport
Representation ID: 10754
Received: 08/05/2009
Respondent: The Len Forge Centre
Whilst not objecting to the development in principle, insufficient consideration has been given to traffic flows in an already busy area - with every east-west residential road being used as a 'rat-run' at commuter times.
The additional traffic generated by 2 millian passenger movement per year will need a considerable expansion of road infrastructure since the narrow corridor serviced by the rail link will not supply the passenger numbers.
Whilst not objecting to the development in principle, insufficient consideration has been given to traffic flows in an already busy area - with every east-west residential road being used as a 'rat-run' at commuter times.
The additional traffic generated by 2 millian passenger movement per year will need a considerable expansion of road infrastructure since the narrow corridor serviced by the rail link will not supply the passenger numbers.
