London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for Hillside Rd Residents Association search
New searchSupport
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Issue 1
Representation ID: 4754
Received: 27/02/2009
Respondent: Hillside Rd Residents Association
We generally support the Masterplan with the extension of the runway. There must however be constraints on the increased noise levels with an accurately measured prediction of noise levels in terms that the public can understand. This measure must also be included in the consultation. This Masterplan should drastically improve economic and employment opportunities for the area.
We generally support the Masterplan with the extension of the runway. There must however be constraints on the increased noise levels with an accurately measured prediction of noise levels in terms that the public can understand. This measure must also be included in the consultation. This Masterplan should drastically improve economic and employment opportunities for the area.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Issue 2
Representation ID: 4756
Received: 27/02/2009
Respondent: Hillside Rd Residents Association
We agree that the pursuit of increased employment should be a major part of this action Plan, and so should the drive for increasing investment in the area. However, the aquisition of development land must be done sensitively with softer options also being considered. |The balance is crucial in order to also preserve the residential and recreational character of our Seaside Town.
We agree that the pursuit of increased employment should be a major part of this action Plan, and so should the drive for increasing investment in the area. However, the aquisition of development land must be done sensitively with softer options also being considered. |The balance is crucial in order to also preserve the residential and recreational character of our Seaside Town.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Issue 3
Representation ID: 4757
Received: 27/02/2009
Respondent: Hillside Rd Residents Association
We applaud the words but need to know HOW will you "consider and assess noise and air quality"? and HOW will you "ensure quality of life is maintained for residents"?
We applaud the words but need to know HOW will you "consider and assess noise and air quality"? and HOW will you "ensure quality of life is maintained for residents"?
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Issue 4
Representation ID: 4758
Received: 27/02/2009
Respondent: Hillside Rd Residents Association
An appropriate transport strategy is essential, and in addition to the points already listed must guarantee free moving traffic without holdups; be future proofed as far as possible from an inevitably increasing number of vehicles and lorries using the roads; provide sensible facilities for parking.
An appropriate transport strategy is essential, and in addition to the points already listed must guarantee free moving traffic without holdups; be future proofed as far as possible from an inevitably increasing number of vehicles and lorries using the roads; provide sensible facilities for parking.
Comment
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Preferred Options
Issue 5
Representation ID: 4759
Received: 27/02/2009
Respondent: Hillside Rd Residents Association
The implications of many of these Preferred options need closer scrutiny before decisions are made. We do not like the proposal to use the flying club strip as the passenger focus for the airport. There is a need to preserve valued facilities wherever possible and the flying clubs should remain or be reallocated to a comparable site. Maybe there is a need to improve the facilities for the small flying clubs in the area?
The implications of many of these Preferred options need closer scrutiny before decisions are made. We do not like the proposal to use the flying club strip as the passenger focus for the airport. There is a need to preserve valued facilities wherever possible and the flying clubs should remain or be reallocated to a comparable site. Maybe there is a need to improve the facilities for the small flying clubs in the area?
