Core Strategy Preferred Options (Revised October 2008)

Search representations

Results for CPREssex search

New search New search

Comment

Core Strategy Preferred Options (Revised October 2008)

Distribution

Representation ID: 3946

Received: 17/12/2008

Respondent: CPREssex

Representation Summary:

CPRE feel that the aim to us only 30% Brown Field sites for further housing developments is too low. Brown Field sites do become available and should be unilised where possible. A 70% use of greenbelt land is unacceptable if we are to preserve the open aspect of the surrounding area.

Full text:

CPRE feel that the aim to us only 30% Brown Field sites for further housing developments is too low. Brown Field sites do become available and should be unilised where possible. A 70% use of greenbelt land is unacceptable if we are to preserve the open aspect of the surrounding area.

Object

Core Strategy Preferred Options (Revised October 2008)

General Locations

Representation ID: 3967

Received: 17/12/2008

Respondent: CPREssex

Representation Summary:

The overall number of dwellings to be build is high, especially 60 in the small settlement of Canewdon. All the houses will necessitate release of Greenbelt land. Additionally, such a proposal in this village will stretch all available facilities. Few buses, no jobs, already difficult road conditions. No footpaths on the already busy roads leading out of the Village. No facilities for teenagers, such as Youth Centres. CPRE feel that numbers should certainly be reduced considerable.

Full text:

The overall number of dwellings to be build is high, especially 60 in the small settlement of Canewdon. All the houses will necessitate release of Greenbelt land. Additionally, such a proposal in this village will stretch all available facilities. Few buses, no jobs, already difficult road conditions. No footpaths on the already busy roads leading out of the Village. No facilities for teenagers, such as Youth Centres. CPRE feel that numbers should certainly be reduced considerable.

Support

Core Strategy Preferred Options (Revised October 2008)

H4 - Alternative Options

Representation ID: 3969

Received: 17/12/2008

Respondent: CPREssex

Representation Summary:

CPRE fully support the need for Affordable Houses in the Rochford Area.

Full text:

CPRE fully support the need for Affordable Houses in the Rochford Area.

Comment

Core Strategy Preferred Options (Revised October 2008)

GB1 Green Belt Protection - Preferred Option

Representation ID: 3975

Received: 17/12/2008

Respondent: CPREssex

Representation Summary:

CPRE are very concern that such a high proportion of the proposed houses should be built on Greenbelt land. Brownfield sites should be the preferred option.

Full text:

CPRE are very concern that such a high proportion of the proposed houses should be built on Greenbelt land. Brownfield sites should be the preferred option.

Support

Core Strategy Preferred Options (Revised October 2008)

ENV2 Coastal Protection Belt - Preferred Option

Representation ID: 3979

Received: 17/12/2008

Respondent: CPREssex

Representation Summary:

CPRE support this initiative.

Full text:

CPRE support this initiative.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.