London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan Issues & Options Paper

C and S Associates agree that the green belt boundary should be revised to enable development to come forward, as identified in the JAAP. In particular the Brickworks site, as defined by the boundary set out in the Issues and Options JAAP, should be taken out of the greenbelt.

The green belt boundary can be amended to enable development of the Brickworks site to take place without compromising any adjoining green belt. The site can provided with defensible boundaries which will afford future protection of any adjoining green belt, should it remain, and so development will not threaten the function and purpose of the green belt.

C and S Associates agree that the Brickworks site, as defined as site i in the various scenarios, should be identified as an Area of Change. Redevelopment of the site will enhance the visual quality of the area and bring environmental benefits.

C and S Associates object to this option because it does not designate the Brickworks site for redevelopment.

The Brickworks site has been identified as a proposed Area for Change in Section 4.6 of the draft document and its redevelopment will enhance the visual quality of the area and bring environmental benefits.

The site should therefore be designated for residential development which will enable redevelopment of the site and assist in enabling Rochford to meet the PPS3 requirement to identify a 15 year housing land supply.

C and S Associates agree with the identification of site i, the Brickworks site, for residential development.

This site has been identified as a proposed 'area for change' in Section 4.6 of this document and designation of the site for residential development will enable the site to be redeveloped, providing benefits such as enhancing the visual quality of the area, environmental benefits and assisting in enabling Rochford to meet the PPS3 requirement to identify a 15 year housing land supply.

C and S Associates object to the proposal for no change to the green belt boundary as this may hinder redevelopment of the Brickworks site.

The green belt boundary can be amended to enable beneficial development of the Brickworks site to take place without compromising any adjoining green belt. The site can be provided with defensible boundaries which will afford future protection of the surrounding green belt, should it remain, and so development will not threaten the function and purpose of the green belt.

C and S Associates agree with the identification of site i, the Brickworks site, for residential development.

This site has been identified as a proposed 'area for change' in Section 4.6 of this document and designation of the site for residential development will enable the site to be redeveloped, providing benefits such as enhancing the visual quality of the area, environmental benefits and assisting in enabling Rochford to meet the PPS3 requirement to identify a 15 year housing land supply.

C and S Associates agree with the proposal to amend the green belt boundary as this will be needed to enable redevelopment of the Brickworks site.

The green belt boundary can be amended to enable beneficial development of the Brickworks site to take place without compromising any adjoining green belt. The site can be provided with defensible boundaries which will afford future protection of the surrounding green belt, should it remain, and so development will not threaten the function and purpose of the green belt.

C and S Associates agree with the identification of site i, the Brickworks site, for mixed use development provided that this development is residential led to enable redevelopment, which is likely to include significant clean up costs.

This site has been identified as a proposed 'area for change' in Section 4.6 of this document and designation of the site for mixed use residential and employment development will enable the site to be redeveloped, providing benefits such as enhancing the visual quality of the area, environmental benefits and assisting in enabling Rochford to meet the PPS3 requirement to identify a 15 year housing land supply.


C and S Associates agree with the proposal to amend the green belt boundary as this will be needed to enable the redevelopment of the Brickworks site.

The green belt boundary can be amended to enable beneficial development of the Brickworks site to take place without compromising any adjoining green belt. The site can be provided with defensible boundaries which will afford future protection of the surrounding green belt, should it remain, and so development will not threaten the function and purpose of the green belt.

We write on behalf of C and S Associates, owners of land which comprises part of the Brickworks site, Cherry Orchard Way, as shown on the red line plan provided.

We understand that the rest of the Brickworks site is controlled by Parkers Land who are represented by J B Planning Associates and we understand that they will make separate representations on the Joint Area Action Plan. There have been discussions between the two parties and we are in agreement with their representations.

The Brickworks site falls within the area of the London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan (JAAP) and has been identified as a 'specific are of change' in the draft document.

The draft document sets out four possible scenarios for development of the area: scenario 1 proposes no designation for the site; scenarios 2a and 2b propose designation of the site for limited residential development; and scenario 3 proposes designation for mixed use comprising residential and employment.

C and S Associates support scenarios 2a, 2b and 3 but do not support scenario 1.

C and S Associates support the proposed designation of the land, as identified as site i in the JAAP scenarios, for residential development or residential led mixed use development.

The Brickworks site is previously developed land and currently lies derelict and detracts from the surrounding landscape. Significant costs are likely to be associated with the clean up of the site. Without development it will be difficult to achieve this.

Residential development will assist in enabling Rochford to meet the PPS3 requirement to identify a 15 year housing land supply.

Designating the site in this way this will retain some flexibility and allow the owners to work with Rochford DC to achieve a development which is beneficial to the area.

C and S Associates support changes to the green belt boundary to enable development of the Brickworks site. The draft JAAP recognises that without this amendment this may hinder development and we agree with this; the green belt boundary can be amended to enable this beneficial development to take place without compromising any adjoining green belt. The site can provided with defensible boundaries which will afford future protection of the surrounding green belt, should it remain, and so development will not threaten the function and purpose of the green belt.

In addition to this letter we have made an electronic submission answering the specific questions raised in the JAAP document.

If you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me, should you wish to discuss any aspect of the relevant issues, we will be pleased to assist.

We write on behalf of C and S Associates, owners of land which comprises part of the Brickworks site, Cherry Orchard Way, as shown on the red line plan provided.

We understand that the rest of the Brickworks site is controlled by Parkers Land who are represented by J B Planning Associates and we understand that they will make separate representations on the Joint Area Action Plan. There have been discussions between the two parties and we are in agreement with their representations.

The Brickworks site falls within the area of the London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Action Plan (JAAP) and has been identified as a 'specific are of change' in the draft document.

The draft document sets out four possible scenarios for development of the area: scenario 1 proposes no designation for the site; scenarios 2a and 2b propose designation of the site for limited residential development; and scenario 3 proposes designation for mixed use comprising residential and employment.

C and S Associates support scenarios 2a, 2b and 3 but do not support scenario 1.

C and S Associates support the proposed designation of the land, as identified as site i in the JAAP scenarios, for residential development or residential led mixed use development.

The Brickworks site is previously developed land and currently lies derelict and detracts from the surrounding landscape. Significant costs are likely to be associated with the clean up of the site. Without development it will be difficult to achieve this.

Residential development will assist in enabling Rochford to meet the PPS3 requirement to identify a 15 year housing land supply.

Designating the site in this way this will retain some flexibility and allow the owners to work with Rochford DC to achieve a development which is beneficial to the area.

C and S Associates support changes to the green belt boundary to enable development of the Brickworks site. The draft JAAP recognises that without this amendment this may hinder development and we agree with this; the green belt boundary can be amended to enable this beneficial development to take place without compromising any adjoining green belt. The site can provided with defensible boundaries which will afford future protection of the surrounding green belt, should it remain, and so development will not threaten the function and purpose of the green belt.

In addition to this letter we have made an electronic submission answering the specific questions raised in the JAAP document.

If you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me, should you wish to discuss any aspect of the relevant issues, we will be pleased to assist.